Logan James Smith/Yes You're Racist - The salt of the man revealing "Nazis"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
CatParty said:
Exactly. If anyone here complains about him or like con leaks or whatever, needs to remember what site they're on.
Click to expand...
At least here we get it right. Logan couldn't even do that. Not even with all of ANTIFA helping him. I hope one of the people he's falsely accused sues his ass.
 
GabeRegan said:
So what's the odds on some of these people he's wrongly (and maybe even correctly) doxed suing his ass?
Click to expand...

It's pretty much up to him because if he did, he could easily find a lawyer who would take it on contingency. The CDA probably immunizes people who did nothing but retweet the original, but it wouldn't for anything they went and did offline, or anything libelous they said themselves.

Since it was a general harassment scheme they were all participating in together, and calling someone a Nazi is clearly defamatory, they'd all be jointly and severally liable. This means counsel could cast a wide net and sue basically everyone he can find, and then every one of them would be liable for the full damages. So if one guy out there has a few million, they could collect it all from that one guy. Then it would be up to that one guy to sue everyone else to try to get back some of his money.
 
KraftEagle said:
At least here we get it right. Logan couldn't even do that. Not even with all of ANTIFA helping him. I hope one of the people he's falsely accused sues his ass.
Click to expand...

yeah laugh at the shit effort don't get salty at the doxxing
 
he got one right in Washington state and another in CA. the rest are so iffy.

gotta be correct if you're gonna play this game.
 
AnOminous said:
It's pretty much up to him because if he did, he could easily find a lawyer who would take it on contingency. The CDA probably immunizes people who did nothing but retweet the original, but it wouldn't for anything they went and did offline, or anything libelous they said themselves.

Since it was a general harassment scheme they were all participating in together, and calling someone a Nazi is clearly defamatory, they'd all be jointly and severally liable. This means counsel could cast a wide net and sue basically everyone he can find, and then every one of them would be liable for the full damages. So if one guy out there has a few million, they could collect it all from that one guy. Then it would be up to that one guy to sue everyone else to try to get back some of his money.
Click to expand...
I have issues with Joint and Several because I think it gets abused a lot, but sometimes you just need to sit back, principles be damned.

I want this to be one if those times, inshallah.
 
His awkward, bumbling explanation of why he uses a little black kid as his Twitter avatar is pretty funny. Why can't he just explain that it's an old meme? Because memes are racist? Also, someone needs to explain to him the issues with digital blackface.

Edit: Typo.
 
Last edited:
Everything from his demeanor and neckbeard to his baby face just makes him look like a genuine cuck

He's got a long way to go if he ever hopes to become a murderous master doxer
 
Let's check in on our fat salty Jew pig.

IMG_0137.jpg

IMG_0138.jpg
 
I like how even mainstream media takes a disliking of this guy in some level when it comes to accusing the wrong person.
 
epitome of an internet tough guy right here. look at that fucking soft ass babyface, those are the eyes of a man who pisses himself at least once a week. the only thing he's ever confronted is diabetes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom