Plagued Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Do you have a source on that man?

I tried to find the exact quote in the article, but the legalese is frying my brain. I think this is sufficient? Feel free to read the article.
The Supreme Court outlined in Miller a three-prong test for the trier of fact to use in determining what constitutes obscenity. The Government has failed to provide any authority that indicates Congress can usurp the function of the fact-finder by doing away with portions of the Miller obscenity test in regulating visual depictions not involving the use of actual minors. Pornography can only be banned if it is obscene or involves the use of actual minors. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. at 240, 122 S. Ct. 1389. Subsections 1466A(a) (2) and (b) (2) require neither and are therefore overbroad and unconstitutional.
 
Where were all the people who jerk off to drawn child porn when Dreamhost took our domain away? When Cloudflare wrote a borderline-defamatory statement about us being an imminent violent threat? When Liz Fong-Jones systematically harassed the wives of Internet backbone CEOs to take down the Kiwi Farms?

I have no patience for retard faggot gooners who claim to be for freedom of speech and freedom of expression when they don't do anything to defend it for others. They are nakedly self interested and only use those ideals to justify masturbating to abhorrent, disgusting pornography.

There is no freedom to be gained from defending lolicon. I wish not to share company with degenerate child molesting pedophiles. There is nothing wrong with Texas passing this bill.
 
It's all so tiring, the cope of "it's just a drawing," "it's a victimless crime" , and my personal favorite cope, "it's an outlet for pedophiles so they don't offend." Niggers, It might be a drawing and lines on a paper, but it's what the lines on the paper or pixels on the monitor represent and the fact that you subhumans jack off to it. That's why people hate you! That's why you're lumped in with pedophiles, you fucking retards. Kill yourselves.
Making things worse is the aspect of potentially being based on actual children (or AI using actual children to make the material). Also, isn’t a lot of CP pedos making it in order to join a pedo/distribution ring?
My favorite are the ones posting the anime girls with F cup titties and not actual lolis that are clearly intended to be children
View attachment 7092797
You mean the centuries old demons capable of destroying the planet?
If it's AI only, I have no doubt that Texas will win in court. AI images are trained with actual CP so likewise the fruit of that labor is poisonous.

Drawings on the other hand lead to a whole host of other speech issues and there will be thousands of work arounds and defenses that will be used to try to get around it that might make prosecuting infeasible. For instance, Goku's penis is exposed multiple times in the dragonball manga and anime with zero issues, so it can't just be a nude depiction of a cartoon child that sets the standard. But that will be the initial standard as every small town prosecutor and politician tries to make a name for themselves by banning all anime in their county.
I am totally ready for criminal courts to make judgments based on the canon age of a fictional character (if they even have a canon age, that is). Bonus points if a defense attorney tries to argue that the pictures are legal because they took place after a time skip or after a certain canon birthday.

Truly, Internet morality has come to real life.
 
Blame 4cuck and anime porn sites. Both right and left wing terminally onine people are gooners, and both use 4cuck and similar places to a degree.
4chan is a lolicon motherhive
You do know we got 4chan rapefugees out the ass on here, right?

Not that it proves or disproves your point. I'm just making sure that you're aware this is the case.
 
Well, as long as we're pointing fingers to make examples out of people...

Hey, @COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST, nonces like this are the ones you're speaking to the defense of when you go on these tangents.
Yep, there it is. I was waiting for someone to call me a pedophile because I don't agree with allowing the government to just blindly censor things (specifically drawings) that somebody expresses enough outrage by. You're not any different from the soccer moms people were laughing at nearly two decades ago, you are the same organism with different triggers.
 
Where were all the people who jerk off to drawn child porn when Dreamhost took our domain away? When Cloudflare wrote a borderline-defamatory statement about us being an imminent violent threat? When Liz Fong-Jones systematically harassed the wives of Internet backbone CEOs to take down the Kiwi Farms?

I have no patience for retard faggot gooners who claim to be for freedom of speech and freedom of expression when they don't do anything to defend it for others. They are nakedly self interested and only use those ideals to justify masturbating to abhorrent, disgusting pornography.
They were cheering on those entities you mentioned while Kiwis were bumming it on Telegram.
 
Yep, there it is. I was waiting for someone to call me a pedophile because I don't agree with allowing the government to just blindly censor things (specifically drawings) that somebody expresses enough outrage by. You're not any different from the soccer moms people were laughing at nearly two decades ago, you are the same organism with different triggers.
I didn't call you a pedophile. I said these were the people you're defending when you sperg out like this.

It was more of an implicit question of, "Are you sure of your own cause here?" Immediately presuming it was an implied "pedophile" accusation is very suspicious of you.
 
I didn't call you a pedophile. I said these were the people you're defending when you sperg out like this.

It was more of an implicit question of, "Are you sure of your own cause here?" Immediately presuming it was an implied "pedophile" accusation is very suspicious of you.
I'm impressed, this sort of double-talk usually only comes from jews.
 
How hard is it to train AI off pictures of naked adult women, then tell it "okay now shrink everything down"? That seems like a very simple task for AI image generators to accomplish. You could also probably just hand it a medical textbook.
^ This one will be halal'd as a lolicon. Mark my words.
 
If anyone's bored, here's the tweet announcing the passing of Senate Bill 20 in Texas which bans all Ai-Generated child porn, including animation and cartoons. All the replies are just coping and seething about their precious little girl porn now qualifies as criminal on US soil!
View attachment 7092106
The salt is FLOWING
"Loli art is free speech" lmao okay pedophile. These weeb subhumans are all retarded degenerates I swear.
 
If anyone's bored, here's the tweet announcing the passing of Senate Bill 20 in Texas which bans all Ai-Generated child porn, including animation and cartoons. All the replies are just coping and seething about their precious little girl porn now qualifies as criminal on US soil!
View attachment 7092106
The salt is FLOWING
GTHgHRsaEAAiGfF.jpg
Now if they apply Florida death penalty on child predator we are golden.
Watching troons and loli saying this will lead to their genocide if fucking funny.
They are telling on themselves.
 
We need the government to start going through everyone's drawings to ascertain how old imaginary characters are. Misgendering and microaggressions hold nothing to this level of insane moral purity.

Anyone in favor of the bill, tell me why you shouldn't go to prison for having it on your computer now.

View attachment 7092941
You might have had a point if you actually put any defining neonatal features on that stick figure, faggot. You know for a fact that if you actually added any childlike characteristics, you would've been permabanned on the spot.

That's the difference between the 9000 year old Dragon Maid character and characters like Wonder Woman. Despite it being stated that they're "thousands" of years old, one is very obviously an adult and the other is very obviously a child.
 
Yep, there it is. I was waiting for someone to call me a pedophile because I don't agree with allowing the government to just blindly censor things (specifically drawings) that somebody expresses enough outrage by. You're not any different from the soccer moms people were laughing at nearly two decades ago, you are the same organism with different triggers.
People wanting to shmeat it to drawings of kids is not a political position, and I have no reason whatsoever to defend said position.
 
There was no double talk. He just pointed out that you were defending pedophiles like him and you chose to sperg out about being called a pedophile.
Actually read the post this time, it's only two sentences. The retard pretty blatantly called me a pedophile for not agreeing with this idea that everything that offends anybody should lead to formal censorship.

Too many posters in this thread oblige the exact same logic troons were trying to use in order to shut this site down, including the "well it technically causes real world harm" fallacy we know is bullshit. I can't figure out how they end up on this website if their first reaction to lolicons isn't to observe and laugh at them, but to instead beg the government to put them in prison.
 
Where were all the people who jerk off to drawn child porn when Dreamhost took our domain away? When Cloudflare wrote a borderline-defamatory statement about us being an imminent violent threat? When Liz Fong-Jones systematically harassed the wives of Internet backbone CEOs to take down the Kiwi Farms?
At home, masturbating to drawings of children.
 
If anyone has ever wondered how stupid laws lead to stupid places, this guy's response is a pretty good example.

The idea that censoring drawings might set a precedent for other invasions of free speech, or lead to tools designed to "protect the children" that in reality just violate your privacy at all times, or any of the other lessons we've already learned from observing the aftermath of the Patriot Act, all takes second place to "well I think it's a good idea because I'm offended by these particular drawings." I expect that opinion on Reddit. It's strange to spot it around here.
This is a special case where pretty much nothing else applies.

An absolutely special case. Drawing children engaged in explicit, obscene sexual acts for pornography is wrong. It is a sickness that spreads to vulnerable.

For example, young furries and weebs who beat off to adult portrayed yiff/hentai/yaoi/bara get exposed to drawn pedophile acts or groomed into it through the websites or apps they use.

Taking a legal stand against this is the right thing to do and can prevent active pedophiles from grooming others into it. Remember, grooming starts small and snowballs into the most fucked up atrocious things imaginable.

Loli and shotacons can say it is fantasy or not real all they want, but it really fucks up people's brains, especially when some of the drawings or edited videos are hyper-realistic. Even when it is not reshaded from real life CSAM or photorealistic AI. That kind of shit can Pavlov response a person into wanting to harm an actual child and is why drawn child porn needs to be illegal to make or distribute especially.
 
Back