Plagued Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

[LikeAStone 2.0]

A lolicon lawyer.

The worst combination ever conceived.

 

[Slaughtercel]

A lolicon lawyer.

The worst combination ever conceived.

I've seen lolicon pro fiction psychology students on Xitter. Horrifying.

They also can't use sources like normal people because they biase them to fit their ideology.

 

[TV's Adam West]

I'd use a Vtuber model too if I looked like that

 

[dick brain]

Lmfao her name is fucking Brie Cheese. Null's oshi identified.

 

[TV's Adam West]

Lmfao her name is fucking Brie Cheese. Null's oshi identified.

OH UH CHEESE UWAAAAOO

 

[Maori Kiwifruit Growers]

Texas people, is the anti porn law actually doing anything or is it as enforced as jaywalking is?

 

[LavenderMenace]

Ooooh I get it. She must like Legal Mindset and the only way to appeal to him is acting like a child.

 

[WelperHelper99]

Texas people, is the anti porn law actually doing anything or is it as enforced as jaywalking is?

You will know when we know

 

[Berrakh]

A lolicon lawyer.

The worst combination ever conceived.

Sort of predictable though. The defense of loli has always been embarrassingly close to legalese (it’s a drawing, not a person) while common sense tells us it represents a child because actual children would be illegal.

 

[The Koral Hunter]

Sort of predictable though. The defense of loli has always been embarrassingly close to legalese (it’s a drawing, not a person) while common sense tells us it represents a child because actual children would be illegal.

Dude I got scared that you were a lolifaggot because one of them that were in this thread had Rei as their pfp. Attack mode almost activated lol.

 

[Berrakh]

Dude I got scared that you were a lolifaggot because one of them that were in this thread had Rei as their pfp. Attack mode almost activated lol.

Reifags are pretty bad on the whole. I can admit that. I still wear mine because I chose “Hardcore” on the Difficulty Select Screen of life.

 

[King Of Braves]

Texas people, is the anti porn law actually doing anything or is it as enforced as jaywalking is?

Which one? The one that prosecutes any and all forms of depictions of children in sexual situations, or the one that makes it so you have to provide your ID and give the government full insight into your jerking habits? Because I haven't heard anything related to the first, and a VPN bypasses the second.

 

[Scorpion From MK]

Phonebook Masterpiece

This fat piece of shit is poison to everyone he associates with.


(https://archive.is/Jtrso)


(https://archive.is/ipqyH)

Gaytor had the vtumor on his podcast 2 times.

Spoiler: Local Audio Archives

(https://archive.is/dPOlY)
Also, ESG analyst @Sprate Header wins by doing absolutely nothing.

But most importantly: SORRAY GAYTOR.

 

[cocainePRESIDENT]

Troons mad

Meet almighty loli, retarded sperg who simps after vtubers and Israel. And he works in real estate, rw anime troons are something...they are now just falsely accusing null lmao. Even I don't like null but this low and no he was not 19.




Complimentary

 

[Maori Kiwifruit Growers]

Which one? The one that prosecutes any and all forms of depictions of children in sexual situations, or the one that makes it so you have to provide your ID and give the government full insight into your jerking habits? Because I haven't heard anything related to the first, and a VPN bypasses the second.

I didn't know there were multiple

 

[Maeis]

Texas people, is the anti porn law actually doing anything or is it as enforced as jaywalking is?

That was a mistake if they actually wanted to catch people. Lolicons were nice and comfortable when the only risk was a potentially unconstitutional obscenity law. Now that its a big boy law it goes underground.

 

[Berrakh]

Troons mad

Meet almighty loli, retarded sperg who simps after vtubers and Israel. And he works in real estate, rw anime troons are something...they are now just falsely accusing null lmao. Even I don't like null but this low and no he was not 19.

View attachment 7596216
View attachment 7596214

Complimentary
View attachment 7596229

I am once again wondering… What is their theory for how this narrative, the narrative that only pedos think lolis are pedophilic, doesn’t also imply loli content must be pedophilic if pedos are confidently making this assumption?

Because they’re obviously misstating Null’s age to imply he’s just another Dr. Pizza. It’s their only trick.

 

[The Koral Hunter]

I recently did a full reread of Lolicon: The Reality of ‘Virtual Child Pornography’ in Japan by Patrick W. Galbraith, and after really sitting with it, I found even more contradictions, bad logic, and rhetorical sleights of hand than I did the first time. It leans heavily on “free speech” absolutism, completely ignores normalization, and near the end, draws a false moral equivalence between women and children that’s honestly pretty disturbing — all in ways that feel intellectually dishonest.

Would it be worth writing up a measured, point-by-point critique of the paper to support the thread’s goals? I think it could be a useful resource when these kinds of academic defenses come back up in future discussions.

Let me know if that would be helpful — I already have a rough outline broken down by section.

 

[Jershua Coomer Troon]

Meet almighty loli, retarded sperg who simps after vtubers and Israel. And he works in real estate, rw anime troons are something...they are now just falsely accusing null lmao. Even I don't like null but this low and no he was not 19.

View attachment 7596216
View attachment 7596214

He's acting like this is new info. There are reasons to shit on null, but decade old posts when he was a impotently raging, terminally online, porn addicted teenager (with sociopathic tendencies) isn't a a silver bullet.

Besides, he "was really mad that day".

 

[Resident Knievel]

I recently did a full reread of Lolicon: The Reality of ‘Virtual Child Pornography’ in Japan by Patrick W. Galbraith, and after really sitting with it, I found even more contradictions, bad logic, and rhetorical sleights of hand than I did the first time. It leans heavily on “free speech” absolutism, completely ignores normalization, and near the end, draws a false moral equivalence between women and children that’s honestly pretty disturbing — all in ways that feel intellectually dishonest.

Would it be worth writing up a measured, point-by-point critique of the paper to support the thread’s goals? I think it could be a useful resource when these kinds of academic defenses come back up in future discussions.

Let me know if that would be helpful — I already have a rough outline broken down by section.

I’d read that, it’s better than watching Lawgiver gnaw his own feet off in the other thread. I might learn something