- Joined
- Jun 6, 2018
I remember posting about this guy in a different thread. He creates "hot AI models" that he posts on Instagram and thinks South Korea has a low birth rate because pornography is banned there, ignoring the elephant in the room right next door known as Japan.


https://archive.ph/G9IW4
Here he is defending lolcow Chibi Reviews and lolicons in general:




https://archive.is/PnNP0

I know little about sex crimes in the Czech Republic, but I can comment on the Danish part. What he's alluding to is a (disputed) Danish study conducted by the criminologist Berl Kutchinsky in 1970. The study was carried out only one (1) year after the legalization of pornography in Denmark. Here's what this sick nonce had to say about the link between pornography and sex crimes against children.

https://archive.is/bvsoR

https://archive.is/PmLcr

"Does it say he was supportive of child pornography?" Correct. And in fact, when pornography was legalized in Denmark in 1969, they also legalized child pornography. It took them 11 years (1980) to ban it.
In Sweden right next door, the production and the sale of child pornography was legalized in 1971 and criminalized in print only 11 years later (1982). It took them another 10 years (1992) to extend the ban to moving images.
In both countries, and elsewhere, 70s pedophile activists LOVED Kutchinsky’s research because it allegedly proved that there was nothing wrong with child pornography. In fact, the reason why it took Sweden so long to impose a proper ban on the production of CSAM is that the commission which was investigating regulations of child pornography in the late 70s and early 80s accepted his argument that child pornography had a preventive effect on crime.
In short, this guy is using an example of real life child pornography actually being legalized to argue that sexual perversions such as lolicon pornography, which supposedly has nothing to do with real life CSAM, should be encouraged and accepted.
Last edited:





