Lookism.net - Sluthate's Even More Autistic Spinoff

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
Old concepts in something such as programming and functionality tend to be scrapped for just that reason--because they're bad. Signatures are an entirely unimportant feature since you're already well aware of who is making the post. The best I can think of is they try to give a sense of familiarity in each post. Having a familiar signature remind you of the poster and their previous posts. But in a world that is past dial-up, a similar functionality is achieved through the use of avatars nowadays.



I'm sure as a man you have a lot of knowledge about what a woman would do in that situation.



Some signatures are fun. Members enjoy having them. It's not a big deal as they can be disabled if one chooses to anyways.
 
I don't want to be affiliated with that website. Any mods up in here? Thanks
Yes, they probably should change it to "Lookism.net, a lame SlutHate knock-off with delusions of grandeur whose admin is triggered by this title." I think that would be more accurate.
I don't know who you are talking about but I accept girls have types. However, looks are largely objective and a girl would rather have a 8/10 than a 5/10 who ' is her type' . Sometimes girls only have types to cope with the fact they cannot get elite males(biological instinct).
Honestly, I think most of the male model types your members drool over look like stuck-up pricks. But I like how you define any belief that disagrees with yours as "coping." Isn't that what adults are supposed to do - cope with the fact that life isn't perfect instead of endlessly raging about it?
 
I don't know who you are talking about but I accept girls have types. However, looks are largely objective and a girl would rather have a 8/10 than a 5/10 who ' is her type' . Sometimes girls only have types to cope with the fact they cannot get elite males(biological instinct).

May I ask how a man knows what's in the hearts and minds of every women on earth?
 
Yes, they probably should change it to "Lookism.net, a lame SlutHate knock-off with delusions of grandeur whose admin is triggered by this title." I think that would be more accurate.

Honestly, I think most of the male model types your members drool over look like stuck-up pricks. But I like how you define any belief that disagrees with yours as "coping." Isn't that what adults are supposed to do - cope with the fact that life isn't perfect instead of endlessly raging about it?

How is it lame?My website is superior.

Post some objectively 8/10 males then. I agree that coping is better than endlessly raging, ignorance is bliss. However, the truth is very hard to ignore, which is that people are discriminated based on their looks in real life.
 
May I ask how a man knows what's in the hearts and minds of every women on earth?

The same way @Holden understands all Western women on the planet.

autism-puzzle.jpg
 
Old concepts in something such as programming and functionality tend to be scrapped for just that reason--because they're bad. Signatures are an entirely unimportant feature since you're already well aware of who is making the post. T
A long long long time ago you'd put your real name, address, telephone number, compuserve user, and ham callsign there. You could then post about your poop diaper fetish all over usenet and somehow unfathomably nobody would ever know in your real life.
Nowdays you don't even use the same nick on all the forums you visit.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Emiya Kiwitsugu
How is it lame?My website is superior.

Post some objectively 8/10 males then. I agree that coping is better than endlessly raging, ignorance is bliss. However, the truth is very hard to ignore, which is that people are discriminated based on their looks in real life.

lookismadmin:

Claims he doesn't want to rage.

Proceeds to rage when he can't get the responses he wants from kiwis.
 
May I ask how a man knows what's in the hearts and minds of every women on earth?

Semantics. Most women would simply prefer the 8/10 male. That's not an opinion, that is a fact backed up by reproductive instincts.

lookismadmin:

Claims he doesn't want to rage.

Proceeds to rage when he can't get the responses he wants from kiwis.

I've never raged even once, I honestly thought your thread was pretty funny. Especially the guy that posted images of my posts:lol:
 
Semantics. Most women would simply prefer the 8/10 male. That's not an opinion, that is a fact backed up by reproductive instincts.

You're changing your statement. You said most would take an 8/10 man over a 5/10 man who was her type.

Also, "Reproductive instincts?" Not all women intend to have children, let alone with some random man they're having a brief relationship with. And besides that, I'd like a source on your reproductive instincts.
 
How is it lame?My website is superior.

Post some objectively 8/10 males then. I agree that coping is better than endlessly raging, ignorance is bliss. However, the truth is very hard to ignore, which is that people are discriminated based on their looks in real life.
There's no such thing as an objectively 8/10 person. Just look at your own website. Half the time someone posts a person they think is attractive, someone else replies and says they aren't.

And no one cares if your site is superior, but if the title pisses you off, then it's definitely here to stay. You do not seem to understand how this works.
 
There's no such thing as an objectively 8/10 person. Just look at your own website. Half the time someone posts a person they think is attractive, someone else replies and says they aren't.

And no one cares if your site is superior, but if the title pisses you off, then it's definitely here to stay. You do not seem to understand how this works.


Post some 8/10s and ill comment.
 
Don't give this sick puppy fap material.

let him find his own.


This guy is so boring.. if you are going to try to troll be entertaining so I can laugh, and don't spam my thread. How do I ignore?

Oh, not only do you have gay porn immediately on hand, you're also the only person capable of figuring out what is an objectively 8/10 man, more so than the straight woman?

:gay:


I'm comfortable with my sexuality, aesthetics can be seen from an objective standpoint as I have stated.
 
Back