Lookism.net - Sluthate's Even More Autistic Spinoff

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
You need copdog in your life.
@Dove, I know what you are...
OrvfZDn.png
 
Its a good thing I'm not here to engage in intellectual discourse with them... as previously stated I'm just buffing my ad hominem score.

Kinda why most Kiwis treat Dove like the tard he is, while treating Norwood nicely.

You act like a douche, expect to be treated like one.
Act civilized, intelligent, and nice, you get the same in return.
 
You act like a douche, expect to be treated like one.
Act civilized, intelligent, and nice, you get the same in return.

I have to second this.

I was genuinely taken aback by how nice and accommodating most Kiwis were, considering I came here from SH.

Even people who claim lookism.net has some validity, like @DiamondInTheRough, are treated well provided they don't play Edgelord.
 
I have to second this.

I was genuinely taken aback by how nice and accommodating most Kiwis were, considering I came here from SH.

Even people who claim lookism.net has some validity, like @DiamondInTheRough, are treated well provided they don't play Edgelord.

Well, see, the difference is, guys like you and Norwood actually take the time to properly and intelligently debate, while people like Thonis and Dove go in, guns ablazing, in full "LOLZ, YOU'RE ALL STUPID FAGGOTS" mode.

DiamondintheRough is pretty much a wild card. When he's his usual, boring/dry self, he's fine to talk to, but when he starts having his shitpost/edge lord moments, we let him know.
 
Well, see, the difference is, guys like you and Norwood actually take the time to properly and intelligently debate, while people like Thonis and Dove go in, guns ablazing, in full "LOLZ, YOU'RE ALL STUPID FAGGOTS" mode.

DiamondintheRough is pretty much a wild card. When he's his usual, boring/dry self, he's fine to talk to, but when he starts having his shitpost/edge lord moments, we let him know.

WILD CARD, BITCHES!

I honestly don't remember many edgy posts. There was the pedo thing which you made up to make me less boring, but besides that nothing stands out to me.
 
WILD CARD, BITCHES!

I honestly don't remember many edgy posts. There was the pedo thing which you made up to make me less boring, but besides that nothing stands out to me.

Pretty sure the pedo thing, along with your "UH, ER, IT WAS JUST SATIRE U GUIZE!" rebuttal you made are pretty much common knowledge, both from screencaps from SH, as well as posts you made here.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Emiya Kiwitsugu
You could always throw pillows at 7 paces
Now that is an idea I can get behind. Someone film it and post it to lookism.
Good Sir, I have been training under Sifu Thonis and hold a Purple Belt in Surprise Attack-fu.

What's that noise? In that hedge? BAM! I'm wrapped onto you like a turtles shell.
:sad:
@MyBalls YourChin and @flossman
Gentlemen, gentlemen, please, this is a lookism thread. We have a designated way to settle this.
Dick measuring contest at noon.
Oh crap. This will not end well for me. I've heard all about Flossmandingo...
You should be. Someone tried to mug me once and I was without a weapon... I dick-slapped him in the face and accidentally killed the guy. That was an awkward police report.
 
No kidding. Just plainly asking someone else to go out for a coffee is a great way to test the waters, and have a friendly conversation. No pressure. It's more of a cheatcode than "negging". (Which I never really understood) :\
I wouldn't call it a cheat code so much as trying to fly in under the radar so to speak. Making it casual means that people are usually a little off guard and less reserved.

Try being a nice, optimistic and sociable person after being bullied for being ugly your entire life. Please.
LOL! So in other words you're a twisted little wretch of a manlet with nothing but contempt for people who look better than you simply because they bullied you?

You know, there are ways to fix this but there's no way you're ready for any of them because you need to fix the underlying problem first which is yourself. Even if you had the body of an Adonis, you'd still be a twisted and evil little troll underneath it all. Physical beauty only lasts for a short while. Once it's gone you need something to fall back upon and I don't think you've got it yet.
 
Really no need to say much here. @Holden, you're a hypocritical twerp.

How rich, coming from a exceptional individual whose every post so was laughably illogical that it had to been mercilessly cut down after a mere sentence or two.

There we go again. Accusations, accusations, no examples, nothing.

Baryon's feet stink. They do. I know.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Emiya Kiwitsugu
Where did i say that the persons who weren't attractive were discriminated? I didn't even make any point,i just posted the study and asked opinions.

http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakult...ish/sozialewahrnehmung/sozialewahrnehmung.htm

The results are alarmingly clear. We found an enormously influencing attractiveness-stereotype: The more attractive the presented faces were, the more successful, content, friendly, intelligent, socialble, accessible, exciting, creative and busy the persons were estimated. The opposite applies to unattractive faces: The more unattractive the faces were the more negative characteristics were attributed to the person.
The correlation between attractivity and positive personality characteristics is very high (correlation coefficients between 0.70 and 0.90). We kept interfering factors, such as clothing, smiling, hair-style, jewelry, lighting effects or changing background consistent so that the only stimulus to be judged is the (more or less attractive) face itself.

So there may not be a discrimination against non-attractive nor ugly persons,but for sure there is one for ugly ones.

The definition of halo effect at it's best
Good. What are you planning to do about this? Does Lookism have a plan of action?

I wouldn't call it a cheat code so much as trying to fly in under the radar so to speak. Making it casual means that people are usually a little off guard and less reserved.
I'm going to analyse this in the form of a spoiler because Lord I love to ramble off-topic.
I'd say it's effective because there's no pressure to it. It doesn't carry the same "THIS IS A DATE" vibe that e.g. dinner does. It's not a massive commitment, you can leave without it being awkward if things don't go well, you don't have to dress up, it's not expensive and just generally you're not making the person feel like they're under any sort of obligation. There's no sense of "Well we have to have a second date because I worked so hard on this one" or "Well after all that you should totally come back to my place." As you say, people are less worried about making a fantastic impression, you just get to chat. It's a date where the deciding factor is how much you enjoy each other's company.
 
I don't much care to reply to the sluthate/lookism threads because, frankly, the people that post at sluthate/lookism are immature as fuck and literally make no fucking sense in anything they do.

The only thing I get out of their rants is that they think only looks matter and they want jailbait porn. Some want age of consent gone.

These are the two dumbest things to argue about in the history of society.

Yes, looks matter....when you're choosing a 1 night stand or a quick bang and go friend.
If anyone tells you otherwise, they're trying to sell you some shit.

But really, is anyone arguing with this fact??
Hell, looks also help you get someone else interested; but in reality, you're likely interested in them for their looks too. When you haven't gotten the chance to meet with someone and talk about your common interests, looks are all you got.

BUT looks won't keep a person around long enough to form a lasting relationship if your personality is complete garbage.
I would take a below average looking person with a great personality and common interests over a 10/10 douchebag asshole any day.


And then the jailbait shit. Like what the fuck? There's a reason we're people, human beings, with intelligence. It's so we can get over our basic animal instincts and be a society. Do men tend like younger women? Sure, why not? Because these girls are young and fresh and have many many childbearing years ahead of them. More so than a 50 year old woman anyway.

But, we are part of a society, and when you take part in a society, you must follow the social construct. We aren't mindless animals. Just accept the fact that you can't touch someone under the age of 18 and get over it; it's not like a 15 year old wants anything to do with your sluthate/lookism ass anyway. If a 18 year old woman doesn't want you, a 15 year old sure as hell doesn't either. Unless you're into that bribing for sex with money/candy/new phones. In which case, you have a problem bigger than jailbait interests.

TL;DR version: people at sluthate/lookism are a little slow and should really just be put down; for the betterment of society of course.
 
"you must follow the social construct. We aren't mindless animals. Just accept the fact that you can't touch someone under the age of 18 and get over it"

But social constructs should be natural and not insane. Kinda like your idea that men should follow the social construct by working but that it doesn't matter that they can't find gfs.

What if the age of consent were 80? Also a "social construct we must uphold"?
 
Back