Lookism.net - Sluthate's Even More Autistic Spinoff

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
Holden said:
"you must follow the social construct. We aren't mindless animals. Just accept the fact that you can't touch someone under the age of 18 and get over it"

But social constructs should be natural and not insane. Kinda like your idea that men should follow the social construct by working but that it doesn't matter that they can't find gfs.
Click to expand...

The fact that they are social constructs, by definition of the word, means they are not natural. They are constructed. Society constructs things to life ourselves up over the animals, and one of those things is a set of laws that say that children should be allowed to develop into reasoning, rational adults before predators like you are allowed around them sexually.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Adamska, Dynamite Ninja, Emiya Kiwitsugu and 1 other person
sugoi-chan said:
The fact that they are social constructs, by definition of the word, means they are not natural. They are constructed. Society constructs things to life ourselves up over the animals, and one of those things is a set of laws that say that children should be allowed to develop into reasoning, rational adults before predators like you are allowed around them sexually.
Click to expand...
What I meant is that they should be based on our natures, not insanity of some people. I don't see why should anybody be a rational adult before having sex, which is one of our basic needs. Also, being a rational adult depends from a person to a person. Just face it, twat - 18 as an age of consent, or anything above 12, is nothing but puritan nonsense. This is why liberals love it. They are dumb.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Adamska, Dynamite Ninja, WireSponge and 4 others
Holden said:
What I meant is that they should be based on our natures, not insanity of some people. I don't see why should anybody be a rational adult before having sex, which is one of our basic needs. Also, being a rational adult depends from a person to a person. Just face it, twat - 18 as an age of consent, or anything above 12, is nothing but puritan nonsense. This is why liberals love it. They are dumb.
Click to expand...

Sex isn't a basic need, you twit. You can survive without sex. You can't survive without food, water, and shelter. Those are basic needs.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Adamska, Dynamite Ninja, Trombonista and 3 others
Holden said:
"you must follow the social construct. We aren't mindless animals. Just accept the fact that you can't touch someone under the age of 18 and get over it"

But social constructs should be natural and not insane. Kinda like your idea that men should follow the social construct by working but that it doesn't matter that they can't find gfs.

What if the age of consent were 80? Also a "social construct we must uphold"?
Click to expand...
"you must follow the social construct. We aren't mindless animals. Just accept the fact that you can't kill another human and get over it"

But social constructs should be natural and not insane. Kinda like your idea that we should not kill @Holden.

What if the definition of human were expanded to include @Holden? Also a "social construct we must uphold"?
 
Damn, I missed a giant Holden shitstorm and it's the same shit he always peddles. He doesn't ever change.
 
HickoryDickory said:
No one wants to rate my squishy? :c
Click to expand...
I'm not sure what you mean, so I just drew a really bad sketch of your avatar on my white-board and wrote "Feels" under it.

Edit: Squishy things are cool, though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wait isn't Holden a catholic? Touting the argument from nature seems pretty dumb there.
 
flossman said:
I'm not sure what you mean, so I just drew a really bad sketch of your avatar on my white-board and wrote "Feels" under it.
Click to expand...
A squish is an asexual term for a platonic crush, and crush isn't used due to someone deciding it also meant sexual attraction. (Think of it more like a bromance) I feel it's pretty silly, but whatever. I don't dwell in the community too much as it leads into the special snowflake-ness of tumblr labels. (And I mock it as such. A crush doesn't necessarily mean sexual, imo)

Don't lie @flossman, you have the biggest bromance with @Frank Rizzo - The chemistry oozes out of each and every audio drop. :heart-full:
8QnozIp.jpg

Anyways... He had a lovely jewfro back in the day.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Emiya Kiwitsugu, Stratomsk and autisticdragonkin
HickoryDickory said:
A squish is an asexual term for a platonic crush, and crush isn't used due to someone deciding it also meant sexual attraction. (Think of it more like a bromance) I feel it's pretty silly, but whatever. I don't dwell in the community too much as it leads into the special snowflake-ness of tumblr labels. (And I mock it as such. A crush doesn't necessarily mean sexual, imo)

Don't lie @flossman, you have the biggest bromance with @Frank Rizzo - The chemistry oozes out of each and every audio drop. :heart-full:
8QnozIp.jpg

Anyways... He had a lovely jewfro back in the day.
Click to expand...

I don't deny my bromance with floss. He's mah boi, blu...
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Emiya Kiwitsugu, Lucricities, Stratomsk and 1 other person
Stratomsk said:
http://lookism.net/showthread.php?tid=992
View attachment 35862
View attachment 35864
View attachment 35865View attachment 35866
Its very telling how these people will complain about women not dating them with looks theory and all sorts of ridiculous justifications when their primary hobbies consist of being really generic, nonexistent, or just fapping.
Click to expand...

I'm gonna go out on a limb and assume they don't see the irony.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Emiya Kiwitsugu, Rin and Stratomsk
To them there is no irony: who needs interesting hobbies if looks are all that matters?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Emiya Kiwitsugu
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back