Lookism.net - Sluthate's Even More Autistic Spinoff

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
DiamondInTheRough said:
Why are you even on SH dude? I don't see how a site with the word "hate" in the names aligns with Christian values. And while the sexual conservatism of a lot of people there does align with Christian thought, they're not exactly for the same reasons. And you just said you've fooled around before, so how does that align with your values? I don't think it's wrong that you did, but then you can't go and hold people to different standards. I just don't see how SH/Lookism is going to help you. If you're not that interested in being promiscuous and say you look normal, why even give a shit how you look? Go get a hobby.
Click to expand...
We have missed you
 
willtherealssplsstandup said:
Who says I hate women? I just hate the attitudes/way most girls my age act... which is annoying and bratty. In fact you will see me in many threads stating that women are just like men.
Click to expand...
Sluthaters/lookists are more bratty and annoying than the average 16-yr old girl.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Randall Fragg, Sanae Kochiya, 24isthehighestnumber and 2 others
6ft4 has a scheme to get some poon

Rate my hypothetical plan for Slaying.png


http://lookism.net/showthread.php?tid=7906

(note: images removed)
General day to day life: I will never pursue a girl in my class at uni or from a club/society. The reason for this is because I have never had any success this way and I just get crushes on these girls, become more aspie around them and get stressed out thinking of how I'm gonna escalate with them.

I will also never cold approach, the reason I say never is so that I don't beat myself up over missed opportunities eg. if a girl who was exactly my type sat down next to me on the bus I would want to talk to her but lose my nerve and spend the next week regretting it and hating myself for being such a pussy. By having the mentality that nothing is gonna happen and anything more is a bonus it will give me some mental freedom to not be constantly thinking about girls whom I will never approach.

Online dating: Play numbers game and take whatever I can get even if I have to go down 2 points. Try filter matches down to just girls who are dtf

Festivals: This is a niche scenario since they only occur a couple of times a year but walking around festies shirtless as a lean roidcel is the most legit way to get girls who are dtf to approach you. The girls are usually classic caked up butterface sloots with fit bodies (my ideal type srs). A good alternative to festivals are underground/non main stream music venues. The atmosphere is very laid back and girls often start conversations, especially when drugs are involved. Drug girls just want a good time and are usually easy.

Classic Butterface roidhead worshipers

Classic drug girl (I cropped the BBC she's with out of the pic lol)

Warm Approaches: This is one of the most legit ways to get laid in my opinion. Living with students, house parties and pre-drinks before hitting the town is a must. Most people here will know somebody in common so you have a reason to approach them ("Hey, aren't you friends with my housemate? What are you studying....") Middle class educated uni girls tend to be friendly in these environments despite the fact they would slit your throat if you cold approached them in a nightclub. I will go for the best looking girls possible in these situations simply because I have seen average looking guys hook up with really hot girls in these environments since it's one of the main times where behavior or games will apply. Ireland is one of those countries where there are many beautiful females but very few beautiful males.

Nichtclubs: My plan for nightclubs is to go out with one of my close mates (no shame infront of him) to clubs where we wont know anyone. I have no real online presence so I never get tagged in embarrassing photos that would ruin my non existant reputation.
I will then approach Chubby girls as soon as I get in the club. Most guys go for fit girls at the start of the night and the chubby ones don't start getting attention until close to the end of the night when guys start getting desperate.

Going after Chubby girls in online dating is a waste of time because guys are able to secretly message them and white knight them without the ridicule of other guys. The girls then get an ego and reject the guys because they know that all the guys want from them is sex.
I will make out with these girls in the club in front of everyone no fucks given and this new found public attention should get her wet enough to come home with me. The reason I'm going for Chubby girls in clubs and not ugly ones is because everyone is because ugliness is easier to hide on a night out than fat because of makeup, and every guy being to drunk to figure out if the girl is ugly or not.

You might be thinking that going for these girls is a massive cope, maybe that's true but if an overweight girl is wearing tight enough clothes I'm usually still attracted to her and when she gets naked in front of me I'll be so horny that it's worth the 10 minutes of post orgasmic disgust just so I can add to my kill count. Here's examples of the girls I'm referring to
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Sanae Kochiya and HickoryDickory
He wants Snookie clones and their bumpits? :lol:

A lot of energy and thought went into his "hypothetical plan", too bad it was all over-thought and in vain. Also, a couple of the ladies he posted as fat aren't really. The girl wearing the ugly peplum dress could do better with choosing what to wear... She has really nice hips.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
The way Lookism likes describing their plans to get laid, I often wonder if they forget that women are people to and simply not "someone that looks like me but instead of a dick they have a vagina I stick my dick in."

It's their excessive need to dehumanize the opposite gender that often makes me wonder if these guys are self-parody or just legitimately that dumb.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse, HickoryDickory and Rin
autisticdragonkin said:
http://lookism.net/showthread.php?tid=7836
@sephon started the official antinatalism thread, for virgins who want to end the universe
Click to expand...
... Is this man seriously trying to argue that we shouldn't breed in the off-chance that people's lives will be shitty?

Uhhh... yeah, dude. Life sucks. Doesn't mean we don't carry on. If people seriously stopped breeding because they were worried that their children's futures would suck then I'm pretty sure Africa would be dead by now.

Aaaaaaand I'm betting that you're a fairly well off guy in a first world country with an Internet connection whose only problem is that he hasn't been fucked yet.

Please go on on how life is horrible.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Randall Fragg, NobleGreyHorse and Rin
autisticdragonkin said:
http://lookism.net/showthread.php?tid=7836
@sephon started the official antinatalism thread, for virgins who want to end the universe
Click to expand...

Fuck people who say "There is not ONE convincing argument I've heard against it."

You're only saying that because you've already decided that no argument will convince you of something other than what you've already chosen to believe. It's even more obnoxious when they then go on with an argument that is full of fallacies, bad assumptions and myopic perceptions.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Randall Fragg, NobleGreyHorse, HickoryDickory and 2 others
Sanae Kochiya said:
whose only problem is that he hasn't been fucked yet.
Click to expand...
Be glad you weren't here for both his constant sperging (worse than the usual SHer) about jaw surgery and then his massive gay porn posting. It was definitely an interesting thing to see when I woke up one day and checked the thread...

supdup said:
Fuck people who say "There is not ONE convincing argument I've heard against it."
Click to expand...
He did do us the favor of making it the first line, though. That was rather kind of him.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Rin and Sanae Kochiya
flossman said:
He did do us the favor of making it the first line, though. That was rather kind of him.
Click to expand...

Some more morsels of wisdom from Sephon. Gotta laugh at the strict adherence to isms and the lack of imagination.

"antinatalism is totally in-tune with logic, it has nothing to do with being ugly"

"antinatalism is legit the ultimate redpill as it shows life isn't worth living and it's impossible to get out of depression"

lol

"I'm a partial anti-natalist

The only people who should be breeding are 6+ couples with enough money to raise their children without governmental help."

Just knowing what "6+" means in incelese, I'd place that bet that the majority of people having children are exactly who he says are the people who should be having children.

If I were to go strictly on what I've seen from the incel crowd, I'd have to assume lack of sex destroys the synaptic pathways that allow a person to think through problems.
 
supdup said:
"antinatalism is legit the ultimate redpill as it shows life isn't worth living and it's impossible to get out of depression"
Click to expand...
THEN KILL YOURSELF OR STOP BITCHING, YOU WHINY FAGGOT.

Holy fuck, the whole "pity me I'm suicidal I want some girl to fuck me" is anything but the most autistic thing ever? They suicide bait more than Tumblr.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Randall Fragg, NobleGreyHorse, autisticdragonkin and 1 other person
Sanae Kochiya said:
THEN KILL YOURSELF OR STOP BITCHING, YOU WHINY FAGGOT.

Holy fuck, the whole "pity me I'm suicidal I want some girl to fuck me" is anything but the most autistic thing ever? They suicide bait more than Tumblr.
Click to expand...

Another shining example of Sephon's superior wisdom and logic!

"That's exactly why antinatalism is literally irrefutable."

I've hooked onto this topic because it's something my wife and I have been discussing recently. We are planning on trying for kids later this year. We sat down and logically went through the pros and cons. The conclusions we mutually came to was, we are both smart and educated, we have financial stability, we both have both our parents (our kids will have a full set of grandparents) and we live in a good neighborhood with great neighbors. For a couple like us, we felt it would be a disservice to the world, our families and ourselves not to have children. We feel that this world needs more people that are raised in a loving, supporting home and are well-adjusted and prepared to be a positive force in the world. I think the strongest argument against antinatalism, is that the world needs more smart, wise and rational people and the only way to get those people is for people like me and my wife to have children.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse, HickoryDickory, chimpburgers and 2 others
supdup said:
Another shining example of Sephon's superior wisdom and logic!

"That's exactly why antinatalism is literally irrefutable."

I've hooked onto this topic because it's something my wife and I have been discussing recently. We are planning on trying for kids later this year. We sat down and logically went through the pros and cons. The conclusions we mutually came to was, we are both smart and educated, we have financial stability, we both have both our parents (our kids will have a full set of grandparents) and we live in a good neighborhood with great neighbors. For a couple like us, we felt it would be a disservice to the world, our families and ourselves not to have children. We feel that this world needs more people that are raised in a loving, supporting home and are well-adjusted and prepared to be a positive force in the world. I think the strongest argument against antinatalism, is that the world needs more smart, wise and rational people and the only way to get those people is for people like me and my wife to have children.
Click to expand...
Only if I can be the kid's godfather.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse and Sanae Kochiya
flossman said:
Only if I can be the kid's godfather.
Click to expand...

You will be THE godfather. My kids will have healthy fear of Cop Dog.

Just cause I know some of the Lookism-ites are reading this thread.

Here's a pretty damning argument against antinatalism.

http://therightstuff.biz/2013/03/25/anti-natalism-and-vhemt-the-irresponsible-philosophy/


Anti-natalism is based on the simple concept that reproduction brings humans into the world, and humans will suffer and die, ergo, “breeding” is ethically evil in all respects. We’re not going to go into how this system trips all over the Naturalistic Fallacy with evolutionary ethical claims or go full abstract into how positing that suffering is evil requires you to believe in a metaphysical ethics system in the first place. Instead, let’s hoist anti-natalism with its own petard.

By asserting that we *should prevent suffering, and that humans suffer and cause ecological “damage”, the anti-natalists and voluntary human extinction crowd are being incredibly short-sighted. They never actually seem to be conscious of what happens AFTER humans voluntarily vanish from the planet, which seems strange since most of them have probably read Daniel Quinn’s “Ishmael” at least once. Essentially these childlike intellectually bankrupt nihilists just assume that with no humans, the earth goes back to being a verdant Eden-like paradise, free of the nastiness of homo sapiens putting down shopping malls and strip mining everything. The actual reality is, the earth will go back to remaining a paradise right up until the NEXT species in line achieves sentience*, then you’re right back on track for more suffering, ecological damage, and internecine warfare among whichever animal species figures out written language first.

If, ethically speaking, anti-natalists were at all concerned with preventing suffering, they’d logically investigate two options: Find a way to destroy the entire planet so thoroughly life could never exist on it, or become transhumanists and take very seriously the idea of immortalizing and improving humans. By any logical calculation, the second option is more conducive to providing pleasure for all species, while the first one simply removes the possibility for suffering. If we agree that ending suffering for all sentient species is a goal, humans have a moral obligation to discover how to end mortality and develop into a post scarcity utopian society capable of shepherding the next species in line towards a future free of death and pain. Ethically speaking, the anti-natalist position is one of irresponsibility and short-sightedness. Clearly the sacrifice of some human lives in the goal of eventually discovering an end to suffering and mortality is more noble than nuking the planet or committing mass suicide. Anti-natalists are pretending that the goal of ending suffering is worthwhile, and then shirking from their responsibility by making this goal the problem of the next sentient creature, when humans are clearly closer to solving the dilemma than chimpanzees. It would be an ethical travesty to give up and self select for voluntary extermination when your species is so much closer to evolving beyond mortality and the constraints of biology than any other life-form.

In short, anyone who seriously believes in anti-natalism is actually condoning the future suffering of new sentient species, and deserves to be dismissed as a shortsighted crank.

Not sure if Purps Drank just doxxed himself, but he says this is him competing on Ninja Warrior. I wonder if his mom, who seems like wonderful person, knows what he's up to on the internet.

http://lookism.net/showthread.php?tid=7836&pid=79247#pid79247


EDIT: If this is him, and he is that motivated to improving his life despite his autism. I support him and wish him the best, but he needs to leave the whole lookism and sluthate shit behind and be that inspired and empowered person he wants to be.

EDIT2: the more I think about it, the more I don't think that's actually him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse, Sanae Kochiya, Arctic and 1 other person
supdup said:
Not sure if Purps Drank just doxxed himself, but he says this is him competing on Ninja Warrior. I wonder if his mom, who seems like wonderful person, knows what he's up to on the internet.

http://lookism.net/showthread.php?tid=7836&pid=79247#pid79247


EDIT: If this is him, and he is that motivated to improving his life despite his autism. I support him and wish him the best, but he needs to leave the whole lookism and sluthate shit behind and be that inspired and empowered person he wants to be.
Click to expand...
I always love seeing what these people really look like IRL and how they act and sound. Thonis and Purps try to sound like badasses on the internet when they are both really meek, most likely insecure people in reality. @hood MONEY's posts I can now look at in a different light.

Edit: Damn it. Fooled and didn't remember his Vocaroo shit for a minute.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: supdup
"Sleeping on your face causes assymetry."

Here a lookist debunks "bullshit" lookist theories with more lookist bullshit theories.

https://archive.is/yzZWs
http://lookism.net/showthread.php?tid=3056

"I've sifted through all the lies to deliver the truth and It's so simple - where the bony midfacial region of you face is, this is literally all that women process. And the more high/forward it is, the better."

*boss is on vacation. I'm bored.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back