Horrorcow Lucas Werner - A man of Spokane, Washington who is obsessed with millennial and Gen Z chicks

Today just got interesting.

The director of HoC, after having those images and video forwarded to her, wants to speak to me directly about it.

Ooh?! Which images and videos?

You think Lucas is in trouble?

EDIT: Guess not. Welp, the shelter kinda has a point about not being responsible for whatever the fuck Lucas does not on their grounds. It’s a shelter of last resort, not a government step parent.
 
Last edited:
Unsurprisingly. HoC's director essentially said as long as Lucas keeps his pedophile fantasies, offering to commit medicaid fraud, violent outbursts, and stalking of young women to not on the shelter's property, they're cool with it.
Why not forward the info you have to the prosecutor and even the judge for his Disorderly Conduct case. From what we heard when he was being given the citation for trespassing in the park, Lucas can act "nice and docil". He's likely doing the same every time he goes to community court on Tuesdays. Let them see just how deranged and a threat to the young people in Spokane Lucas is.
 
Why not forward the info you have to the prosecutor and even the judge for his Disorderly Conduct case. From what we heard when he was being given the citation for trespassing in the park, Lucas can act "nice and docil". He's likely doing the same every time he goes to community court on Tuesdays. Let them see just how deranged and a threat to the young people in Spokane Lucas is.

Prosecutors got actual crimes to deal with, not potential crimes or theoretical crimes.
 
Unsurprisingly. HoC's director essentially said as long as Lucas keeps his pedophile fantasies, offering to commit medicaid fraud, violent outbursts, and stalking of young women to not on the shelter's property, they're cool with it.
Pretty shitty attitude when someone's safety could be at stake. I wonder if they'll wash their hands of prior knowledge if anything bad happens by the likes of Lucas.
 
I don’t think Lucas should be banned from the shelter. I believe everyone deserves to sleep under a roof, even bad people. What I wish they could have done is to warn vulnerable young women in the area to stay away from him. Lucas’ behavior is escalating and he’s already at the point he believes a young woman is his “birthright.”

In what world doesn’t everything about Lucas not already scream “DANGER DANGER STAY AWAY!”?

The only women dumb enough to approach him wouldn’t listen to a warning anyways, so the whole thing is really superfluous.
 
This condition/note was added today to his Disorderly Conduct case. Anyone have an idea what it could mean.
Condition: Drug/Alcohol Eval/Tx SOC / 8/25/2020 12:00:00 PM
Notes: ADDED CO OCCURRING MENTAL CHEMICAL DEPENDENCE TXT.

1598393650182.png


ETA:
Yes Lucas -- Insanity, a DV conviction, restraining orders, rage, pathological liar etc. Every thing about your abusive nature says you will not treat a woman well.

1598396348417.png
 
Last edited:
Pretty shitty attitude when someone's safety could be at stake.

Let’s not try to be complete retards here, shall we?

Never mind the fact that: “We can’t be responsible for what he does outside of our facilities” is a pretty reasonable attitude, but what exactly would be accomplished by banning Lucas?

Does anyone seriously believe that he’ll vanish into thin air or something?

I wonder if they'll wash their hands of prior knowledge if anything bad happens by the likes of Lucas.

Why would they need to “wash their hands”?

Surprise: Homeless people commit crimes, murder and rape all the fucking time.

I don’t know what’s more autistic. Posters wanting a homeless shelter to be responsible for what one of their users does outside of the shelter or people acting like Lucas is some kind of horrific aberration to the usual image of homeless people being upstanding, morally impeccable citizens...
 
Prosecutors got actual crimes to deal with, not potential crimes or theoretical crimes.

Keep in mind this is a municipal prosecutor who probably only handles misdemeanors. However, it could still be high volume and they really have no interest in undertaking additional work that doesn’t clear their caseload.
 
Let’s not try to be complete retards here, shall we?

Never mind the fact that: “We can’t be responsible for what he does outside of our facilities” is a pretty reasonable attitude, but what exactly would be accomplished by banning Lucas?

Does anyone seriously believe that he’ll vanish into thin air or something?



Why would they need to “wash their hands”?

Surprise: Homeless people commit crimes, murder and rape all the fucking time.

I don’t know what’s more autistic. Posters wanting a homeless shelter to be responsible for what one of their users does outside of the shelter or people acting like Lucas is some kind of horrific aberration to the usual image of homeless people being upstanding, morally impeccable citizens...
Jeez calm down.

To be notified by a concerned citizen and then to more or less say it's nothing to do with us is a shitty attitude to have. We're not talking about pilfering and the likes ffs. Being homeless isn't a passport.

But hey if you're happy with a mental deficient who seems to be spiralling, getting more desperate for sex with young kids then fill your boots. Thankfully others aren't.
 
This condition/note was added today to his Disorderly Conduct case. Anyone have an idea what it could mean.
Condition: Drug/Alcohol Eval/Tx SOC / 8/25/2020 12:00:00 PM
Notes: ADDED CO OCCURRING MENTAL CHEMICAL DEPENDENCE TXT.

View attachment 1547215

ETA:
Yes Lucas -- Insanity, a DV conviction, restraining orders, rage, pathological liar etc. Every thing about your abusive nature says you will not treat a woman well.

View attachment 1547325

Thats not a very clear note on their part tbh. It could mean several things. It really depends whether the 'co' part of that is in reference specifically to the mental side of things or both the mental and chemical dependence. The former implies multiple mental illnesses and the latter implies mental illness that either requires medication for treatment or that he has a chemical dependency of some kind. Since he isn't a drug addict and has limited access to weed i'm assuming its a reference to his medication requirement

I'd say hes acted strangely enough for his PO to figure out he is mentally ill in a serious way by now, so adding that note in there could be a precursor to adding an additional condition to his probation. Something along the lines of 'must take his prescribed medications to treat his mental illnesses' which wouldn't surprise me as such conditions are pretty common with mentally ill people on probation to lower the chance of fucking it up. That said, its still a poorly worded note, they really should make that stuff a bit more clear

and he really must be a fucking idiot if he actually believes there isn't any evidence of his behavior and actions. Rumors without proof? What an idiot. and that narcissistic smug 'fuck you' look he's giving there isn't helping any. No wonder he's worried about people beating his ass if he does that to people on a regular basis
 
and he really must be a fucking idiot if he actually believes there isn't any evidence of his behavior and actions. Rumors without proof? What an idiot. and that narcissistic smug 'fuck you' look he's giving there isn't helping any. No wonder he's worried about people beating his ass if he does that to people on a regular basis
I think someone here (you?) brought up that all his talk about cameras covering every spot in Spokane is because he is running scared. He likely thinks if he says cameras are everywhere in the city it's going "safeguard" him. He's such a moron if he thinks people are going to believe every spot in the city is monitored.
 
This condition/note was added today to his Disorderly Conduct case. Anyone have an idea what it could mean.
Condition: Drug/Alcohol Eval/Tx SOC / 8/25/2020 12:00:00 PM
Notes: ADDED CO OCCURRING MENTAL CHEMICAL DEPENDENCE TXT.

View attachment 1547215

ETA:
Yes Lucas -- Insanity, a DV conviction, restraining orders, rage, pathological liar etc. Every thing about your abusive nature says you will not treat a woman well.

View attachment 1547325

His continual inappropriate use of meme font should automatically disqualify him from finding a Boyfriend-free Girl.
 
This condition/note was added today to his Disorderly Conduct case. Anyone have an idea what it could mean.
Condition: Drug/Alcohol Eval/Tx SOC / 8/25/2020 12:00:00 PM
Notes: ADDED CO OCCURRING MENTAL CHEMICAL DEPENDENCE TXT.

View attachment 1547215

ETA:
Yes Lucas -- Insanity, a DV conviction, restraining orders, rage, pathological liar etc. Every thing about your abusive nature says you will not treat a woman well.

View attachment 1547325

it means he is required to receive treatment for mental illness and substance use. Txt is treatment. Co-occurring means dual diagnoses

ETA: he was previously given drug and alcohol requirements including no use and a substance use eval. My guess is that the substance use eval recommended treatment. His mental illness also likely became very evident so they added treatment.

I vehemently contest the notion that they are requiring him to be on psych meds yet. It’s very early on in his case for them to require that. It’s usually a last chance issue where his continual violations lead them to offer him discharge from the court program or mandated med compliance.

he also is absolutely diagnosable for a substance use disorder. He has continued substance use despite legal consequences and despite it being contraindicated for his psych issues. That’s 2/11 diagnostic criteria there.

most of the time the court starts with substance use eval as a judge cannot order treatment without a professional first assessing and recommending treatment. Once the assessment is complete, the judge can require “completion of all recommendations, including outpatient treatment” and sometimes inpatient depending on the case.

so to summarize, Lucas is now mandated to get dual diagnosis treatment for his mental illness and substance use disorder. He’s not being forced to be on meds yet. That takes a good deal more than a community court to mandate medications,unless it’s simply pursuant to staying in the program, but even for that, I doubt he is there yet. My guess is he will take jail time over meds if it comes to it.
 
Last edited:
Back