- Joined
- Jun 25, 2013
I admire your analysis. You've touched on what I consider to be a few of Lucas's defining characteristics: his anger, his refusal to accept responsibility, his litany of grievances, his inability to accurately assess his situation. Lucas perseverates on what he sees as injustices, and they all relate to being denied teen poonaner.
There's a word for men like Lucas: tard.
There's also another word for men like Lucas: wound collector. Or grievance collector. It's useful for describing the psychology of mass shooters, like Elliot Rodgers, and terrorists.
Lucas obsesses over imaginary grievances, and his broken perception allows him to find endless evidence to support his narrative: these people ruin my life by cockblocking me. I'm plenty good. Read the following TLDR and tell me it doesn't describe Lucas:
Sounds familiar, doesn't it?What is a wound collector? In essence these are individuals who go out of their way to collect social slights, historical grievances, injustices, unfair or disparate treatment, or wrongs—whether real or imagined.
They don’t forgive or forget and they don’t move on. They wallow in the actual or often perceived transgressions of others and they allow sentiments of animosity and vengeance to percolate and froth at the surface by their constant and attentive nurturing of those perceived wounds. As you can imagine, in an imperfect world where there are real injustices, where people make mistakes, and stupid things are said and done, the wound collector never has to go far to feel victimized.
Why do we call these “wounds” and not something else? Some have referred to these individuals as grievance or injustice collectors. These terms don’t do justice to the morbid pathology at work here any more than to call someone who suffers from bulimia or anorexia “food averse.” The illness that underpins the thinking and behavior of these individuals is psychological wounding.
Psychological wounding is nothing new. In fact, many people have psychological wounds from an abusive parent or spouse, or some other life real life trauma. But they do not seek to indulge these. Though traumatized by them, most people try to put these things behind them. They don’t seek to nourish these psychological wounds.
Quite conversely, the wound collector not only hangs on to the wounds he perceives, he goes out and collects more wounds by selectively looking for those things that support his entrenched beliefs. Through flawed observations, logic, or reasoning, the wound collector is hobbled by a “confirmation bias” that systematically reinforces a pre-existing belief or position. Convinced of their beliefs, even in the face of contrary evidence, they become saturated and hobbled by their self-created toxic brew of irrational biases. This irrationality in turn breeds hate and contempt for others—two key features abundantly present with wound collectors.
Beyond a mere injustice, something we have all experienced, psychological wounding drives deep into the psyche of the individual. This causes them to develop maladaptive patterns of behavior, thinking, or interacting that are inflexible, antagonistic, interfere with interpersonal relationships or that are significantly distressing to the individual.
For these folks there is never a fix or a cure. Nothing is ever good enough and apologies mean nothing. For them, there is always yet another event they perceive as a slight or a grievance. For them the world holds nothing but nastiness and it affects how they see the world and how they react to the world—suspiciously and with contempt. When irrationality, antagonism, and rigidity combine with unyielding overconfidence in their own sentiments and beliefs go unchecked or are not attenuated, these individual become metastable—ready to ignite and explode.
On Wound Collectors
Lessons learned from extremists, mass murderers, and those who can't let gowww.psychologytoday.com
This is the common thread running through his hatred of Cyril, flatbills, gray beards, Republicans, capitalists, greed mongers, pussy horde-ers(sic), Christians, people with cars or credit cards, and bitches that won't let him fist them; and also his antagonism to his mother, and psych doctors. They've all wounded Lucas by denying him what is rightfully his: poonaner.
Lucas's interview demonstrates his wound collecting imo. And if you weren't already convinced that Lucas could be dangerous (despite being a total pussy), he's always providing more evidence.
Last edited:
