"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Pascal's Wagie said:
>last couple months
Nigga, it's been years. It was probably at its worst when the gay nazi role play went from /pol/ to then-new Discord around Trump's first campaign. Thankfully that one guy went crazy and converted to Islam and murdered his two roommates and got the head of Atomwaffen arrested, charged, and sentenced on federal explosives charges. I'm sure there's a red string of yard connecting early Trump-era Discord nazis to the O9A freaks like that one disgusting troon that got shot in the ear in that one video.
Click to expand...
Maybe it's just that I stay in my relatively small bubble and it's exploded on my Twitter timeline. But I do follow Varg and all he does is bitch about that all day.
 
Null said:
Note that the totally real goys trying to say Christianity is just Judaism+ can't summarize why without a post long enough to fill a new book of the Talmud.
Click to expand...
"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished."

I wonder who said that...oh well, I'm sure he wasn't important.
 
  • Dumb
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Autistic
Reactions: Ether Being, Marvin, The Great Horned Moth and 5 others
Tathagata said:
I wonder who said that...oh well, I'm sure he wasn't important.
Click to expand...
I know what you're trying to imply and I'm not going to refute it. I don't care about your opinion and I'm not going to dignify it. Your thesis is disingenuous, subversive, and talmudic. Try posting on /pol/ or some boogaloo discord.

The conclusion you're trying to present is only possible when working backwards, which says all I need to know about what you're doing and why.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: geckogoy, Account, Inside your walls and 19 others
Tathagata said:
"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished."

I wonder who said that...oh well, I'm sure he wasn't important.
Click to expand...
I don't even need to engage with the specifics of your argument to know I can dismiss what you have to say solely because of the smug way in which you say it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Great Horned Moth, Clamater, I'm a Silly and 4 others
Null said:
I know what you're trying to imply and I'm not going to refute it. I don't care about your opinion and I'm not going to dignify it. Your thesis is disingenuous, subversive, and talmudic. Try posting on /pol/ or some boogaloo discord.

The conclusion you're trying to present is only possible when working backwards, which says all I need to know about what you're doing and why.
Click to expand...
I think that the fallacy these types fall into is believing that Pre-Christ and Post-Christ Judaism are 1 to 1 identical, and that Jews are just Christian minus the New Testament.

There is a Christian YouTube channel I watch called Redeemed Zoomer and in one of his videos he made a good point that in the period since Christ, Judaism has essentially developed itself in opposition to Christianity.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Ether Being, indomitable snowman, donjulio and 19 others
Tathagata said:
What Jesus did was no different than what the rabbis did regarding all the other commands in Leviticus, Exodus, and Deuteronomy, though the Jesus movement clearly did emphasize more than the early rabbinic movement certain things (prophethood, wonderworking, and lay ministry) and certain texts (Isaiah) over other things (purity laws, food commandments, beliefs about the nature of sin, the role of the Temple, Shabbat restrictions). These differences in emphases accord with what was happening in the pluralistic context of Jewish thought in Judea and the Galilee during late antiquity more generally (see, e.g., the catalogue of texts at Qumran or the texts contained in the Cairo Genizah).

To say this isn't what's happening and that Jesus was totally divorced from the Judaism he grew up in, identified himself with, and explicitly preached to, is, at best, antinomianism. At worst, it's just cope.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I was gonna add something about how the story of the oven of Akhnai isn't about "Jews outjewing God". The context is that the rabbis didn't like charismatic figures like the Teacher of Righteousness, Jesus or Rabbi Eliezer going around claiming unique divine authority for their halakha. The mutual influence continued for a long while after most people think; I'm sure there are a lot of Jews who would find it very unsettling to learn that the Ashkenazic explosion of Talmud commentary happened at the same time as French priests were starting to write similar styles of works on Roman law, or that the move towards pshat in Biblical commentary happened in parallel with developments in that vein from Christian scholars. I once even read an article by a Sephardic rabbi claiming that medieval Ashkenazim became corrupted by feminism due to the prominence of Mary in Christian culture. It's complete nonsense, but still.
Null said:
Note that the totally real goys trying to say Christianity is just Judaism+ can't summarize why without a post long enough to fill a new book of the Talmud.
Click to expand...
Fine, I'll do it in a picture:
IMG_20240509_201639_021.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Agree
  • Dumb
Reactions: geckogoy, Ether Being, donjulio and 17 others
Tathagata said:
"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished."

I wonder who said that...oh well, I'm sure he wasn't important.
Click to expand...
since some people feel less inclined, I'll offer some food for thought. Consider the actual meaning of your quote. What are "The Law" or "The Prophets"? If we consider the context, where the pharisees and nonbelievers refute the central claim of Jesus Christ regarding His Godhood, it becomes clear that at the very least two different conceptions these two ideas exist. Since Jesus is the Messiah and the nonbelievers say he isn't, the sources used by Him and them are possibly the same but not necessarily for the conceptions either side forms of "The Law" and "The Prophets". This means they are necessarily comprised by different components of the sources or source. Either the textual/verbal basis for the claims which comprise either pair of conceptions are different, or the interpretations of said bases are. At the very least you are ignoring this necessary difference, which means you require a substantive mapping of the disparate bases to each other in a 1 to 1 fashion for the problematic aspects of judaism or Christianity for even a piecemeal formation of the ad hoc argument implied by that selective excerpt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marsh Rabbit
All of these petty and ridiculous arguments, trying to figure out which 2000 year old faggot has the best ad campaign. One side saying you should be able to suck baby dick and murder the unborn, the other side saying you should kill yourself if you enjoy titties.

In the darkest parts of your hearts, all of you know there is only one truth and one way to it.

The path is grey.
 
  • Dumb
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Dislike
Reactions: AnIntrepidCrow, Ether Being, donjulio and 8 others
This religious talk is just the retarded political anon’s M.O. applied to religion— trying to find the most superficially cool and powerful (sounding) position they can.

It’s actually very similar to AF’s Christ is Kang jouissance. With the same central mistake. Having maxed-out “right wing beliefs” is not going to make you powerful or even an asset to right wing politics because beliefs are at best a codification of your own nature and often a cope for who you really are. It’s entirely a social-jockeying phenomenon. Read Nietzsche.
 
  • Dumb
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: AnIntrepidCrow, Ether Being, The Great Horned Moth and 4 others
Berrakh said:
This religious talk is just the retarded political anon’s M.O. applied to religion— trying to find the most superficially cool and powerful (sounding) position they can.

It’s actually very similar to AF’s Christ is Kang jouissance. With the same central mistake. Having maxed-out “right wing beliefs” is not going to make you powerful or even an asset to right wing politics because beliefs are at best a codification of your own nature and often a cope for who you really are. It’s entirely a social-jockeying phenomenon. Read Nietzsche.
Click to expand...
>Nietzsche
>German faggot with mommy issues talking about he’ll be the biggest strongest boy
>dies of Syphilis after chasing a prostitute who didn’t like him
>based his philosophy on a different faggot who got owned by his mother and threw women down stairs
>also both of them liked Rosseau

Nah, I’d rather just read philosophy by someone without mommy issues.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Dumb
Reactions: Ether Being, Gorton Colu, The Great Horned Moth and 9 others
HodgePodgeRogerDodger said:
>Nietzsche
>German faggot with mommy issues talking about he’ll be the biggest strongest boy
>dies of Syphilis after chasing a prostitute who didn’t like him
>based his philosophy on a different faggot who got owned by his mother and threw women down stairs
>also both of them liked Rosseau

Nah, I’d rather just read philosophy by someone without mommy issues.
Click to expand...
See what I mean? Nietzsche’s observation that beliefs are commonly affectations is dismissed by some guy with a chip on his shoulder, which is another affectation to simulate “power”.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: InspectorJappOfficial, Nonconsentual Pronouns, Blackhole and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back