- Joined
- Sep 26, 2018
@Null let me guess you first heard about Repo the Genetic Opera from Jim Sterling?
"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2022
New drinking game: lick the bottle every time Null pretends to speak German, plays a German song, or makes a reference to Germany.
I've heard less talk about Japan from weebs.
I've heard less talk about Japan from weebs.
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2023
disagree, I posted the AUSLÄNDER RAUS song in the music thread and even made sure it was a small file, but I missed it if he played any version of the song at all.
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2021
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2022
Mad at the Internet 2024-05-31:
https://files.catbox.moe/n5h3uy.mp3 (archive.org) (archive.org)
edit: local upload kept failing
https://files.catbox.moe/n5h3uy.mp3 (archive.org) (archive.org)
edit: local upload kept failing
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2019
Eyesore City
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2023
That is Quanell X. He was (is?) the head of the Houston chapter of the New Black Panther's Party. Every time a black kid gets shot in Houston or surrounding areas he's first on the scene spinning the dindu nuffin defense. When a literal high school football team raped an 11 year old girl, he said it was the girl's fault.A teacher in the Houston area was outed as an aspiring OnlyFans thot. This man, who I can only assume is a preacher, was on the news outing the woman in the most southern manner possible. Well worth the minute to watch
View attachment 6038831
The educator in question
View attachment 6038841
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2021
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2022
It’s not embedded in normie psychology. YouTubers are not normies. They are niggercattle who suckle on the sweet tit of Google adcents. Google has them trained in the Pavlovian sense because the second they misgender a man LARPing as a woman, they take away their milk.
The carefully gendered language is 100% astroturfed. Recommend watching content that isn’t dependent on YouTube monetization.
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2023
As a tattoo autist myself I want to correct Jersh on Anisa. The elbow spiderweb is historically indicative of just prison time in general, not MS-13 specifically. But basically anyone gets it now as filler for that spot. But yes, the back design is stupid, makes zero sense, and has no flow, I could get a better backpiece by a better artist for like 3k.
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2018
Why are killstream callers always double digit IQ? You can either choose the life of debauchery and not have kids, pets, or drive; or you can choose to be a responsible adult. If you try to do both and inevitably fail, you are a piece of shit.
If you are going to have fun destroying your life, don't take other people down with you, especially those who are not in a position to support themselves without your support like your kids.
Last edited:
Jomi
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2022
Lol imagine moving to a place where they outnumber humans 2:1. Those fixer-uppers should be half that price.
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2019
A teacher in the Houston area was outed as an aspiring OnlyFans thot. This man, who I can only assume is a preacher, was on the news outing the woman in the most southern manner possible. Well worth the minute to watch
View attachment 6038831
The educator in question
View attachment 6038841
He's no preacher. He's a race riot activist and is only bitching because the woman is white.
This coon is human filth and should've been done in after he ran defense for 18 of his brethren who raped an 11 year old girl.
Kataskopos
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2023
If you've ever slept in an area with locusts, imagine the chirping but instead of chirping it's gunshots
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2021
Mad at the Internet for May 31st 2024 has been archived to YouTube
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2016
Since Null briefly touched on "it's not a .22, it's a .223" and suggested there is some complexity to the situation that causes people to yell at him, there is!
.223 refers to bore diameter*, so the actual dimensional difference between .22LR and .223 is very very very tiny. So tiny in fact that there are conversion kits to allow .223 rifles to fire .22LR by completely changing out the bolt carrier group for a special bolt carrier.
Above is an AR-15 bolt carrier + bolt, middle and bottom are .22LR conversion bolts carriers + "bolt". Yes, you do chamber and fire the .22LR bullet through what is effectively a dummy hollow .223 casing which chambers in the chamber of a .223 firearm. Also for comparison, .223 casing (expended) is middle, .22LR (unexpended) is bottom.
These have a notoriously spotty reputation, but strictly speaking what Nick has is no weapons CHAMBERED in .22LR, not "no .22s". Yes that's pedantic as fuck.
Speaking of chambers, here comes the actual complexity.
Null referenced .223 and 5.56, which are strictly speaking different specifications for a nearly identical thing, but with important differences. 5.56 chambers are specced for 61000psi, and .223 is specced for 55000psi. 5.56 also has a slightly larger chamber for reasons related to the military origin of the 5.56 specification.
Now, you might be thinking "wait, if the NATO spec is 6000psi higher than .223, isn't that a problem?" Yes! It is!
For the longest time, the general advice was "don't shoot 5.56 out of a .223, but you can shoot .223 out of a 5.56", however there's a surprise twist! A third common chamber exists: .223 Wylde. Often ALSO shortened to ".223" in most casual contexts for extra confusion.
.223 Wylde is basically the answer to question of what the fuck you do when you want a chamber that can handle 5.56 chamber pressures AND is sufficiently tuned up to be accurate enough to shoot NRA High Power (which takes things out to 1000 yards). It's gotten pretty ubiquitous since it fixes the chamber pressure issue so nearly any barrel you buy will be .223 Wylde or 5.56, but you have to watch out with older .223 barrels of unclear provenance as they might not be able to handle 5.56 since they might not be .223 Wylde.
For bonus fun: 7.62x51 and .308 Winchester are also different specifications for a nearly identical thing, but in a twist, in the opposite way: .308 is the higher pressure chamber, 7.62x51 is lower, and case dimensions differ slightly (NATO is longer, slightly). For extra double confusion, most modern weapons have beefed up their chamber pressure specs for 7.62 NATO barrels to deal with people throwing .308 in them, and in general .308 will eat 7.62x51 but that extra length of the 7.62x51 NATO casings throw in a wrinkle that can be an issue, but it just doesn't seem to be most of the time.
*Want even more fun? Often these dimensions aren't strictly "accurate" when it comes to making assumptions about barrel and chamber dimensions based on the name of the cartridge specification. For example, .38 Special and .357 magnum fire the same size projectile, but those numbers are very different. Another interesting example is 7.62x39 vs 7.62x51: you'd think the diameter is identical, right? Well...7.62x39 is typically .311 and 7.62x51 is .308 diameter, because of course it is. What that means is that reloading 7.62x39 can actually be a lot more difficult than you might think, since depending on your barrel, a .308 bullet may or may not grab the rifling very well on a .311 barrel. Or it might. It might even shoot better with .308 than .311 bullet but you won't know until you put a few down the pipe to check and see.
''
Edit: I can't believe I forgot about .50BMG/.510 DTC. Same bullet between the two, just slightly different case dimensions, yet one claims .510 (and some of us remember when it was called .50 DTC, not .510). This one is almost pure naming for that odd difference in supposed diameter through because the round was designed to get around prohibitions on .50 BMG ammo and firearms specifically and no other reason.
.223 refers to bore diameter*, so the actual dimensional difference between .22LR and .223 is very very very tiny. So tiny in fact that there are conversion kits to allow .223 rifles to fire .22LR by completely changing out the bolt carrier group for a special bolt carrier.
Above is an AR-15 bolt carrier + bolt, middle and bottom are .22LR conversion bolts carriers + "bolt". Yes, you do chamber and fire the .22LR bullet through what is effectively a dummy hollow .223 casing which chambers in the chamber of a .223 firearm. Also for comparison, .223 casing (expended) is middle, .22LR (unexpended) is bottom.
These have a notoriously spotty reputation, but strictly speaking what Nick has is no weapons CHAMBERED in .22LR, not "no .22s". Yes that's pedantic as fuck.
Speaking of chambers, here comes the actual complexity.
Null referenced .223 and 5.56, which are strictly speaking different specifications for a nearly identical thing, but with important differences. 5.56 chambers are specced for 61000psi, and .223 is specced for 55000psi. 5.56 also has a slightly larger chamber for reasons related to the military origin of the 5.56 specification.
Now, you might be thinking "wait, if the NATO spec is 6000psi higher than .223, isn't that a problem?" Yes! It is!
For the longest time, the general advice was "don't shoot 5.56 out of a .223, but you can shoot .223 out of a 5.56", however there's a surprise twist! A third common chamber exists: .223 Wylde. Often ALSO shortened to ".223" in most casual contexts for extra confusion.
.223 Wylde is basically the answer to question of what the fuck you do when you want a chamber that can handle 5.56 chamber pressures AND is sufficiently tuned up to be accurate enough to shoot NRA High Power (which takes things out to 1000 yards). It's gotten pretty ubiquitous since it fixes the chamber pressure issue so nearly any barrel you buy will be .223 Wylde or 5.56, but you have to watch out with older .223 barrels of unclear provenance as they might not be able to handle 5.56 since they might not be .223 Wylde.
For bonus fun: 7.62x51 and .308 Winchester are also different specifications for a nearly identical thing, but in a twist, in the opposite way: .308 is the higher pressure chamber, 7.62x51 is lower, and case dimensions differ slightly (NATO is longer, slightly). For extra double confusion, most modern weapons have beefed up their chamber pressure specs for 7.62 NATO barrels to deal with people throwing .308 in them, and in general .308 will eat 7.62x51 but that extra length of the 7.62x51 NATO casings throw in a wrinkle that can be an issue, but it just doesn't seem to be most of the time.
*Want even more fun? Often these dimensions aren't strictly "accurate" when it comes to making assumptions about barrel and chamber dimensions based on the name of the cartridge specification. For example, .38 Special and .357 magnum fire the same size projectile, but those numbers are very different. Another interesting example is 7.62x39 vs 7.62x51: you'd think the diameter is identical, right? Well...7.62x39 is typically .311 and 7.62x51 is .308 diameter, because of course it is. What that means is that reloading 7.62x39 can actually be a lot more difficult than you might think, since depending on your barrel, a .308 bullet may or may not grab the rifling very well on a .311 barrel. Or it might. It might even shoot better with .308 than .311 bullet but you won't know until you put a few down the pipe to check and see.
''Edit: I can't believe I forgot about .50BMG/.510 DTC. Same bullet between the two, just slightly different case dimensions, yet one claims .510 (and some of us remember when it was called .50 DTC, not .510). This one is almost pure naming for that odd difference in supposed diameter through because the round was designed to get around prohibitions on .50 BMG ammo and firearms specifically and no other reason.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2019
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2020
@Null, are you gonna have that site ready this year for all the companies supporting this pride shit?
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2020
Nick is more often than not, pedantic as fuck. The moment I saw that, “I have no .22’s” line, I knew, (as did many Balldo thread regulars,) that he was doing his usual weasel words crap. Nick likes to lie by attempting to obfuscate, often using technicalities and relying on assumptions to pull him through. It’s become a regular personality trait of his. He’s pretentious and pedantic, & thinks he can out wordsmith anyone. He’s also drunk, but again that’s obvious. It’s nice to have the technicality described in detail, regarding his spent ammunition from the bedroom floor of his trap house. Makes it so his weasel words are less likely to trick unsuspecting onlookers.
prollyanotherlurker
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2024
Who the fuck are the retards arguing the only way for people to get over depression is going to therapy and taking meds?
Im not even one of the people that say meds are bad all the time. But specifically when it comes to depression. I promise anyone thay your biggest help is changing how you think, and start that by changing your actions. Antidepressants wont change your life, and if your life doesnt change and you can't learn things like gratitude and humility. Then the however many sessions of therapy you take won't matter.
Only YOU can change how you think and feel. Talking to a therapist is literally just a facade of actual self improvement.
Im not even one of the people that say meds are bad all the time. But specifically when it comes to depression. I promise anyone thay your biggest help is changing how you think, and start that by changing your actions. Antidepressants wont change your life, and if your life doesnt change and you can't learn things like gratitude and humility. Then the however many sessions of therapy you take won't matter.
Only YOU can change how you think and feel. Talking to a therapist is literally just a facade of actual self improvement.