"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I like destiny somewhat, glad to see he’s open to discussion (as long as he’s not gonna be a nigger about it).
 
1. Same as the last one but Wizard/Hasbro cracked whip & added "i am sorry " added a 1.2 to 1.1 OGL - done

What changed - Nothing but we took out fee's ( for Now)
1674181193039.png
Termonology:
OGL Basics
As with my last article, let’s get some terms out of the way.

Work
A copyrighted work (or, for simplicity, “work”) is an original creation (such as a graphic, book, video, song, or program) that can be protected by copyright law.

Copyright Holder
A Copyright Holder is the person who holds the rights to a specific Work. This can be the author of the Work, or whoever received ownership from the author.

Open License
Copyright Holders can choose to issue an open license to their Work if they want others to freely build with, customize, or improve the Work. Open licenses give permission to anyone to use the work without cost and minimal restrictions on modifications.

Creative Commons License
A creative commons license is a version of an open license that enables the free distribution of otherwise copyrighted Works. Wizards has elected to use the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license for the core D&D mechanics — which may be fairly meaningless, because core mechanics of a game are generally not copyrightable.

Perpetual License
A Copyright Holder can issue a perpetual license — which is a license to use the Work indefinitely. This only means that the license does not have an inherent expiration date. It can still be terminated or revoked.

Virtual Tabletop
Virtual tabletops (VTTs) are programs designed to allow users to recreate an environment to play tabletop games online. Notable VTTs include Alchemy RPG, Roll20, and Foundry VTT.

Revocable License
A license can be revocable or irrevocable. If a license is irrevocable, then it cannot be revoked by the Copyright Holder. If a license is revocable, then it can be revoked by the Copyright Holder. If the license does not say it is irrevocable, then it is revocable by default.

Third Party Creators
Third Party Creators (in this case) are individuals or companies that make their own works based on a Copyright Holder’s Open License to a Work.
Click to expand...

What is in draft OGL 1.2?
Overall, WotC clearly listened to the community’s feedback here. A quick review of the OGL shows the following:

Effect on OGL 1.0a. OGL 1.0a is expressly revoked here, which goes against what the community wanted from the beginning. This does allow any Works published under OGL 1.0a to remain published under OGL 1.0a — but new Works must be published under this proposed OGL 1.2.

What Does It Apply To? This only applies to printed media and static files (such as e-publications and .pdfs). Typically these take the form of items, adventures, settings, and compendiums published via Kickstarter or Patreon from Third Party Publishers. This expressly does not affect WotC’s Fan Content Policy — so your favorite podcasts and actual-plays are safe for now.

Section 2 — License. The new OGL is perpetual and non-exclusive. This is fantastic. However, it expressly does not state that it’s royalty-free. This is not fantastic. It also states that it’s only partially irrevocable — Works made under the license will always be under the license, but the license itself can be withdrawn.

Section 3- What You Own. Third Party Creators would own their content, and there is no license back to WotC. However, if WotC “makes something similar” to a Third Party Creator’s Work, then that Third Party Creator can’t prevent WotC from distributing the similar Work. The Third Party Creator can only sue WotC for money lost as a result of WotC’s distribution.

Section 6(c)- No Infringement. This section is a statement from Third Party Creators to WotC promising that the Third Party Creators’ Works will not unlawfully steal or borrow content from anyone else’s Works. This is generally fine, however, it doesn’t protect Third Party Creators who unknowingly or unintentionally use someone else’s Works.

Section 6(e)- No Illegal Conduct. This section is a statement from Third Party Creators to WotC promising that the Third Party Creators’s Works will not violate the law. Again, generally fine — however, it should be limited to the laws that apply to that Third Party Creator. Laws are different from place to place, and it’s unreasonable to require someone in Alaska to know if they’re violating the law in Ecuador.

Section 6(f)- No Hateful Content or Conduct. This section is a statement from Third Party Creators to WotC promising that the Third Party Creators’s Works will not include hateful content, and that the Third Party Creator will not engage in hateful conduct in their personal or professional lives. This is a great morality clause, except that WotC has the sole right to decide what is hateful here, and the Third Party Creator gives up all rights to fight that decision. That’s too much power.

Section 9(h)- Review by Counsel. This section advises everyone agreeing to this license to consult a lawyer. This is fairly standard, but I highlight it because I agree — Third Party Creators need lawyers.

Virtual Tabletop Policy. The proposed OGL 1.2 does not expressly address Virtual Tabletops, but instead relies on the new Virtual Tabletop Policy (which is also open for feedback). This Virtual Tabletop Policy expressly allows for Virtual Tabletops to continue to operate — but does prohibit immersive experience Virtual Tabletops. That means that if you have a Virtual Tabletop that enhances the Virtual Tabletop experience beyond what you would have a physical tabletop (such as with animation or depictions of spells) then that Virtual Tabletop is not authorized by WotC to contain assets from the SRD 5.1, under this policy.

What does this mean?
As this unfolds, keep in mind the following:

1. The license is not expressly royalty-free, even though it does not contain royalty language. It needs to be expressly royalty free.

2. The license gives WotC broad rights to suppress Works they deem “hateful” — which is usually ok, but should be subject to some sort of good faith on WotC’s behalf. Also, Third Party Creators need to be able to challenge WotC as to what constitutes “hateful” so that WotC cannot abuse this power.

3. This license is revocable and can be replaced at a later date — which prevents the community from truly building a foundation on it. We could find ourselves just as easily in the same situation at any time.
Click to expand...

2.
Musk kills third-party twitter apps.

1674179967116.png
A prick pulled the plug. And what bothers me most about it is how Space Karen did i
Click to expand...
3.
The relative asked Zachary if he's worried about the two boys and wondering where his sons are. "I mean, yeah, but I definitely can't talk about that. But, umm, I mean, yeah, and then I'm concerned about the house and everything. Because, you know, nothing's being paid, obviously because I'm here. The longer things that go on, the worse all that gets," Zachary responded.

"The sooner we get out, the sooner I can manage our finances because things are gonna start piling up..." Zachary emphasized.

William is concerned as well about bills and monthly expenses. "We do have, like, subscription stuff that needs cancelled like, you know, Disney +, Amazon Video. All that needs to be cancelled because it's auto-hitting our credit card," William stressed.
Click to expand...
the two boys who were adopted through a Christian special-needs adoption agency
Click to expand...
Authorities were tipped off that Lawless uploaded and stored child sexual abuse material (CSAM) on his Google account through an "emergency CyberTip"
Click to expand...
https://archive.ph/Yvk4p-main one

https://archive.ph/ACUGt - facts & favorite punch bag anime

https://archive.ph/0vMLQ- adoption process & women advisor talk with parents
 

Attachments

  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: murph, Quintus, Nonconsentual Pronouns and 1 other person
denuvo is based because fuck this one anime tranny who says its bad
5 seconds later
I hate the unicorp all Hasbro executives should be burning in eternal hellfire
it was pretty funny that I didn't catch this the first time
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wild Wild Sonichu, BlancoMailo and Chiri
WOTC updated the OGL to 1.2. Apparently they're really waving around the "NO BIGOTS ALLOWED" bullshit just as much, if not more than in 1.1. I haven't gone through much of the finer details of 1.1 and just now got a cursory glance at 1.2 and I'm half asleep at the keyboard.
www.dndbeyond.com

A Working Conversation About the Open Game License (OGL)

These past days and weeks have been incredibly tough for everyone. As players, fans, and stewards of the game, we can't–and we won't–let thi...
www.dndbeyond.com www.dndbeyond.com
1674212558694.png
1674213082712.png


"No hateful content or conduct. If you include harmful, discriminatory, or illegal content (or engage in that conduct publicly), we can terminate your OGL 1.2 license to our content."

It sounds intentionally vague and seems to tacitly mention applying this towards the person behind the content and everything they ever say or do. I'd wager this is a convenient way to arbitrarily oy-vey absolutely anything or anyone for any reason, since all they have to do is nitpick for subjective shit. Possibly only releasing their grip once they've been tithed? They're still going to nullify 1.0a, so when they say "your OGL 1.2 license to our content", they really mean 'fuck you, 1.2 Kikemaster Edition is your only option, goy'. They could theoretically eradicate someone's livelihood for 'discrimination' simply for using the old racial systems, since Wokies of the Cucks removed in-game racial differences at some point, IIRC.

Orcs take intelligence and charisma penalties like the niggers they are and we're going to keep applying it to our games for believable immersion. Cry more.
 
  • Informative
  • Autistic
  • Like
Reactions: notafederalagent, Subhuman Degenerate, Johnny Salami and 2 others
  • Like
Reactions: notafederalagent, The Mass Shooter Ron Soye, Hot Dog and 1 other person
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: The Mass Shooter Ron Soye and WebLurker
Null said:
Taking requests for today.

youtu.be

Mad at the Internet (January 20th, 2023)

https://tip.mati.livehttps://mati.live
youtu.be youtu.be
odysee.com

One Monkey, No Stop, No Show (January 20th, 2023) - Mad at the Internet

https://madattheinternet.com/2023/01/20/one-monkey-no-stop-no-show/
odysee.com odysee.com
rumble.com

Mad at the Internet (January 20th, 2023)

https://tip.mati.live https://mati.live
rumble.com rumble.com

Dzhoshua Mun's videos | VK

vk.com vk.com
t.me

Mad at the Internet 🎙

Mad at the Internet on Telegram
t.me t.me
Click to expand...

"The moderator amici do this work without pay"
Click to expand...
Attached is the full brief. Which was linked already, sort of, via a link to a thread that had a link to this document edited into it hours later so I'm unsure if this has been posted itself yet. Nonetheless, tomorrow, 20 January 2023, will be the day that sets into motion whether "they do it for free" is an aspect of federal law or not.

The brief itself is worth reading. Reddit is outright lying to SCOTUS and saying that Reddit does not control what content may or may not appear in subreddits, and that subreddit moderators are not chosen by Reddit.

"Reddit has been sued, for example, under Texas’ new law regulating social media platforms, HB 20, for a volunteer moderator’s decision to ban a user who called the fictional character Wesley Crusher a “soy boy” in the /r/StarTrek subreddit. See Petition: Small Claims Case, Cox v. Reddit, Inc., No. S22-87J1 (Just. Ct. Denton Cnty., Tex. May 17, 2022) (plaintiff claims to have been “banned and/or de-platformed from /r/StarTrek for posting a lawful opinion about a fictional character”)"

There's a good thread on rdrama about it if you want more info, I copied all this from there:

"They do it for free" is going to be on official Supreme Court record tomorrow

> "The moderator amici do this work without pay" Attached is the full brief. Which was linked already, sort of, via a link to a thread that had a link to this document edited into it hours later so I'm unsure if this has been posted itself yet. Nonetheless, tomorrow, 20 January 2023, will be...
rdrama.net rdrama.net
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Richard Cheese, notafederalagent, Alligator Alcatraz and 8 others
Null said:
Taking requests for today.

youtu.be

Mad at the Internet (January 20th, 2023)

https://tip.mati.livehttps://mati.live
youtu.be youtu.be
odysee.com

One Monkey, No Stop, No Show (January 20th, 2023) - Mad at the Internet

https://madattheinternet.com/2023/01/20/one-monkey-no-stop-no-show/
odysee.com odysee.com
rumble.com

Mad at the Internet (January 20th, 2023)

https://tip.mati.live https://mati.live
rumble.com rumble.com

Dzhoshua Mun's videos | VK

vk.com vk.com
t.me

Mad at the Internet 🎙

Mad at the Internet on Telegram
t.me t.me
Click to expand...
We know what you think of Viscous VIckers, so I'm interested on your thoughts about Harry Morris and his escapades.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hot Dog
A brief touch on the whole Ralphamania dumpster fire post mortem might be nice and the fact that Ralph is the spitting image of late stage Lowtax. Other than that was kind of a quiet week.

You could also talk about people acting retarded in the Patrick thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AnotherBlackstarTest
Nogglor said:
Destiny won't give josh any atttitude. If you''ve seen any of his videos from the last year or two you'd know that he usually tries to match the attitude of whoever he talks to. If Josh comes in screaming "nigger nigger tranny cuck faggot" then Steven will probably match that for a few minutes before leaving the convo, calling it a waste of time. That probably won't happen though cause Josh isn't a retard. Also Tom will be there to moderate things just in case.
Destiny and Null will get along waaaay better than most of you think. Just look at his converstations with Fresh&Fit, Nick Fuentes, Lauren Southern, etc. If he can get along with these retards than he'll absolutely get along eith Josh.

Also what the fuck will they even talk about? The most interesting conversation they could have is probably about the morality/purpose behind doxxing and if KF should even allow it. If they talk about trannies it'll be boring tbh.
Click to expand...
nah, destiny's a faggot with an awful, nasal voice who just talks extremely quickly and loudly to make it sound like he's well-read and articulate.

i imagine josh will have better prepared and better thought-out arguments than jontron did, but i can only see this going a similar way - the less experienced, less overbearing "debater" , while actually being right on many points, get steamrollered by a deluge of superficial nonsense and BRO DO YOU HAVE A SOURCE FOR THAT????
 
  • Agree
  • Disagree
  • Like
Reactions: Ice Gun Ninja, WebLurker, Peace Or Love and 3 others
Hot Dog said:
A brief touch on the whole Ralphamania dumpster fire post mortem might be nice and the fact that Ralph is the spitting image of late stage Lowtax. Other than that was kind of a quiet week.

You could also talk about people acting retarded in the Patrick thread.
Click to expand...
Ralph also got drunk and high on pills last night and tried to hire gropers to produce the show and be his live in butler.
This post has some good clips
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/the-k...aceful-sunset-productions.81183/post-14343212
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Local Fed, beautiful person and Hot Dog
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back