"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Someone working at the EFF definitely leaked this information to his or her fellow lefty twitter addicts. That Cooper Quintin guy is a prime suspect. Jackie Singh has even directly interacted with him before.
Good digging. Funny how small these circles of extremists are. They’ve got gun nuts, activist hackers and extortion merchants, What next, an RV full of fertiliser parked outside a post office in WV?

And the EFF internal leak is a major fucking scandal and should be front page news all over the tech world IMO.
 
Last edited:
I’m surprised that Jersh hasn’t shitted on Sneako more
Sneako requirements.png
Link
 
@Temperance XIV

I have the reply bug and can’t quote your post, but thank you for cataloging this.

If Corynne McSherry can read this, please take note of the volume of harassment you are receiving on publicly accessible, mainstream social media. Please take note of the varied and sundry types of disgusting antisocial perverts harassing you and the violent, gendered abuse they are no doubt sending your way. Take note of the fact that this is the same kind of behavior you imply is criminal, at least when posted on, or otherwise claimed to be originated from this small, independently hosted website that has inexplicably become an enemy of well-positioned abusive degenerates in the internet stack.

If you are uninformed of this, please note that this kind of concerted abuse that you are receiving is the exact same means by which they are attempting to deplatform this website. Their abusive is often directed at the families of mid-level ISP executives, especially their wives for reasons that should be obvious.

I would love to read an article about all of that, and now that you realize that you are now a permanent target of abuse from the exact same people you were trying to placate, you have nothing to lose in writing it.

Maybe as a start, you could specify that no, Kiwi farms as a platform is no more responsible for criminal responsible than any website than the mainstream ones by which you have received abuse. Maybe point to something specifically illegal here, if you’re going to make those claims.

Whatever you do, don’t apologize. You know how bad a precedent has been set by Hurricane Electric, and your original article showed you understand the problem well. Apologizing will just give ISP’s another excuse to clamp down when it serves their own interests, and will ensure that targeted harassment as a weapon against speech will continue.
 
Last edited:
@Null I had to do a lot of driving today and listened to an old MATI from Dec 18, 2020. You were talking about some fair access to banking act that was inexplicably listed after new federal guidelines for snacks. I got curious and looked it up and it appears that a modified version of the bill was read back in Feb of this year. Here's a summary page. I had highlighted some specific sections but I can't figure out how to completely sanitize a PDF so I'll just include some of these highlights

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
(3) banks are now, however, increasingly employing subjective, category-based evaluations to deny certain persons access to financial services in response to pressure from advocates from across the political spectrum whose policy objectives are served when banks deny certain customers access to financial services

(8) when a bank predicates the access to financial services of a person on factors or information (such as the lawful products a customer manufactures or sells or the services the customer provides)…the bank has failed to act consistent with basic principles of sound risk management and failed to provide fair access to financial services

(9) banks have a responsibility to make decisions about whether to provide a person with financial services on the basis of impartial criteria free from prejudice or favoritism

(10) while fair access to financial services does not obligate a bank to offer any particular financial service to the public, to operate in any particular geographic area, or to provide a service the bank offers to any particular person, it is necessary that—

(A) the financial services a bank chooses to offer in the geographic areas in which the bank operates be made available to all customers based on the quantitative, impartial risk-based standards of the bank, and not based on whether the customer is in a particular category of customers;
(B) banks assess the risks posed by individual customers on a case-by-case basis, rather than category-based assessment; and
(C) banks implement controls to manage relationships commensurate with these risks associated with each customer, not a strategy of total avoidance of particular industries or categories of customers;

SEC. 3. PURPOSES.
The purposes of this Act are to—
(1) ensure fair access to financial services and fair treatment of customers by financial service providers, including national and State banks, Federal savings associations, and State and Federal credit unions;
(2) ensure banks conduct themselves in a safe and sound manner, comply with laws and regulations, treat their customers fairly, and provide fair access to financial services;
(3) protect against banks being able to impede otherwise lawful commerce and thereby achieving certain public policy goals;
(4) ensure that persons involved in politically unpopular businesses but that are lawful under Federal law receive fair access to financial services under the law

SEC. 5. PAYMENT CARD NETWORK.
(b) PROHIBITION.—No payment card network, including a subsidiary of a payment card network, may, directly or through any agent, processor, or licensed member of the network, by contract, requirement, condition, penalty, or otherwise, prohibit or inhibit the ability of any person who is in compliance with the law, including section 8 of this Act, to obtain access to services or products of the payment card network because of political or reputational risk considerations.

SEC. 7. USE OF AUTOMATED CLEARING HOUSE NETWORK
(b) PROHIBITION.—No covered credit union, member bank, or State-chartered non-member bank with more than $10,000,000,000 in total consolidated assets, or a subsidiary of the covered credit union, member bank, or State-chartered non-member bank, may use the Automated Clearing House Network if that member bank, credit union, or subsidiary of the member bank or credit union, refuses to do business with any person who is in compliance with the law, including section 8 of this Act.

SEC. 8. FAIR ACCESS TO FINANCIAL SERVICES
(5) FAIR ACCESS TO FINANCIAL SERVICES.—
The term ‘‘fair access to financial services’’ means persons engaged in activities lawful under Federal law are able to obtain financial services at banks without impediments caused by a prejudice against or dislike for a person or the business of the customer, products or services sold by the person, or favoritism for market alternatives to the business of the person.

(6) FINANCIAL SERVICE.—The term ‘‘financial service’’ means a financial product or service, including—
(A) commercial and merchant banking;
(B) lending;
(C) financing;
(D) leasing;
(E) cash, asset, and investment management and advisory services;
(F) credit card services;
(G) payment processing;
(H) security and foreign exchange trading and brokerage services; and
(I) insurance products.

(b) REQUIREMENTS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—To provide fair access to financial services, a covered bank, including a subsidiary of a covered bank, shall, except as necessary to comply with another provision of law—
(B) not deny any person a financial service the covered bank offers unless the denial is justified by such quantified and documented failure of the person to meet quantitative, impartial risk-based standards established in advance by the covered bank
(C) not deny, in coordination with or at the request of others, any person a financial service the covered bank offers; and
(D) when denying any person financial services the covered bank offers, provide written justification to the person explaining the basis for the denial, including any specific laws or regulations the covered bank believes are being violated by the person or customer.

(2) JUSTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.—A justification described in paragraph (1)(D) may not be based solely on the reputational risk to the covered bank.
 
I can't say that I'm shocked that Corynne's co-workers threw her under the bus for not licking their Tranny overlords boots. However, for someone who claims that they studied things like fair use and freedom of speech she doesn't understand either. I for one would never ask her to take a Freedom of Speech case given her thoughts on this website. Though she is from California so it's not like she'd understand American laws.

That being said. Her from 2017. She was never a sensible woman.
Elie Mystal had a point. She's too stupid to realise it.


She's also fat.
 
Elie Mystal had a point. She's too stupid to realise it.
View attachment 5312271

She's also fat.
The literal niggerfaggot having a histrionic fit is the real star of this video.

EDIT: The black dude's name is Elie Mystal? Sounds like a fat Jewish chick's name, which is why I thought it was the EFF woman named Elie Mystal.
 
Last edited:
The literal niggerfaggot having a histrionic fit is the real star of this video.
If you mean the black guy. He wrote a called "Allow Me to Retort: A Black Guy's Guide to the Constitution" which is supposed to tell people what rights the Republican's are trying to take away from them people. To me, he just came off as a Liberal's coon. I do agree with him that we should all have our little corner of the internet and if we do anything wrong we're in one space so we can all be found and locked away. Luckily we're not criminals unlike what his Liberal overlords tell people. Only Communists want people to keep silent and never discuss anything.

The woman is also wrong in thinking that we should all talk amongst ourselves so we can sway opinions. Fuck people and fuck their opinions. If their opinions mattered then I would have shared them. I have my own, it means that I am a free thinking human being. If they don't like that then I would suggest they also find a small corner of the internet and fuck the right off.
 
If you mean the black guy. He wrote a called "Allow Me to Retort: A Black Guy's Guide to the Constitution" which is supposed to tell people what rights the Republican's are trying to take away from them people. To me, he just came off as a Liberal's coon.
Yeah, he comes across as being an Uncle Tom for the Dems. His performance in this video was unintentionally hilarious.
 
Back