View attachment 5366657
Am I allowed to work with the Federal Bureau of Investigation for the sole purpose of sitting like a tumor and being as incompetent as possible?
This is really a winning move. The federal government is infested with smug, pompous retards that have no idea what they're doing. Ripe for manipulation. Remember a few MATIs ago, where Null was talking about the Internet tech company competency crisis, where modern tech companies have no idea how their own technology works? The entire military industrial complex is facing a similar crisis.
Anyone who advertises the wrong politics gets fucked by the system hard. Say a lieutenant goes to a mandatory diversity conference in June (on his own time of course, because they won't pay him when they order him to go) and he decides to set up a cheeky little table to also celebrate white diversity. His commander will usually respond by taking him off the project he's working on and sticking him in a dark corner until his commission runs out.
This petty behavior fucks the system over in two ways. Firstly, the lieutenant becomes disillusioned with the system and will keep his mouth shut if he sees fraud, waste, or abuse. Secondly, the lieutenant's expertise in the project he is working on is immediately lost because he's just going to be replaced by a DE&I nigger who won't care.
You should think bigger than just taking your salary and never giving them anything quantifiable in return. You could get smart in your position to actively sabotage their projects. For example, let's say you are tasked to write a contract for the development of a 3 million dollar piece of equipment over the next five years. You can find the lowest bidder possible from a shitty little startup in Texas, who'll pretend they can do it for 1 million in one year, and secure a promotion because you just saved the fed 2 heckin' whole million dollars. What will happen (because this always happens) is the shitty startup will end up costing the fed 6-9 million dollars and deliver a glorified paperweight ten years later that was on the precipice of working before the fed got litigious. The fed always falls for the sunk cost fallacy until the project becomes such a shitshow that legal gets involved, then all progress immediately stops.
The best part is the courts usually side with the shitty startup because the fed had the homefield advantage in writing the contract. Of course, they'll never connect the dots that you're somehow to blame. After all, you're a contract expert with over ten years of tenure and you can quantify how much money you've been saving the government (hopefully hundreds of millions of dollars at that point in your career). You are an indispensable member of their team (with the right surface-level politics) and they'll always reward one of their own. Besides, how can they possibly blame you? You haven't worked that project in over ten years!
