"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I dunno. Men bitch about random women on the internet and forums all day. If Lidl Drip doing it back to men makes you really angry and seems really unfair then what does that say? It’s hard to say only one of these is demented but the other isn’t

It’s better, and more honest, to criticize their effort more directly. Lidl possibly jumps on stories to prove this point that aren’t really credible or good, or picks fights with people who aren’t really the sort of characters they have this beef with.
I heard Lidl Drip is going straight to JAIL for gossiping about an e-celeb on an e-celeb gossip site. It's fucking over. It was fine to talk about everyone else, but COUNT DANKULA?! That is too fucking far! I'll have you know he officially removed the tranny cock from his mouth now that tides have officially turned against trannies, after simping for femboys and troons for years despite being married with children. Remember he once made his dog do a hitler salute so he is /our/guy and BASED and definitely does not fuck trannies anymore.

And also these pictures are now officially illegal to post, so don't.

E-RgLEpXoAUKhXf.jpg
FXnchdHWYAAzybe (1).jpg

This is DEFINITELY NOT your POV when you are Count Dankula arriving at his "office" to get help from his "assistant":

E3ezrWVXoAIJEl4.jpeg
E3ezrBcWEAEONBd.jpeg
 
This is a bit fringe but I have discovered recently learning about disability rights a fun new article called "Complexity as Epistemic Oppression." The woman, who appears to be a natal woman cursed to have gotten her PhD or first teaching position in fucking Ohio has published a paper arguing that philosophy is too hard for people who can't read good.

1708581198241.png

1708581237883.png

1708581276385.png


Epistemology is the subbranch of philosophy concerned with how we know what we know, and how and why we believe things. It's navel gazing at its finest, but it's also incredibly valuable for understanding difficult matters with complex and thorough reasoning about truth. This is an article published in a reputable journal of philosophy. Since philosophy is too complicated for the retarded, it is oppression. Philosophy needs more retards, even ones who can't speak or write. It is oppression to not include people who cannot communicate verbally in a profession that is at its core an insoluble language game. Twitching and drooling should be enough, and we should help twitchers and speak for them and consider them just as much of a human as a nontwitcher who is debating what personhood is with another nontwitcher.

This woman wants to polevault in academia by way of a clever modern update to the 3/5ths rule, if you say you're doing it for retarded people, you get to say what they want and vote twice on whether a paper is bad and oppressive or good and liberating.
 
This is a bit fringe but I have discovered recently learning about disability rights a fun new article called "Complexity as Epistemic Oppression." The woman, who appears to be a natal woman cursed to have gotten her PhD or first teaching position in fucking Ohio has published a paper arguing that philosophy is too hard for people who can't read good.
That's it, Singer was right.
 
This is a bit fringe but I have discovered recently learning about disability rights a fun new article called "Complexity as Epistemic Oppression." The woman, who appears to be a natal woman cursed to have gotten her PhD or first teaching position in fucking Ohio has published a paper arguing that philosophy is too hard for people who can't read good.

View attachment 5745023
View attachment 5745025
View attachment 5745027

Epistemology is the subbranch of philosophy concerned with how we know what we know, and how and why we believe things. It's navel gazing at its finest, but it's also incredibly valuable for understanding difficult matters with complex and thorough reasoning about truth. This is an article published in a reputable journal of philosophy. Since philosophy is too complicated for the retarded, it is oppression. Philosophy needs more retards, even ones who can't speak or write. It is oppression to not include people who cannot communicate verbally in a profession that is at its core an insoluble language game. Twitching and drooling should be enough, and we should help twitchers and speak for them and consider them just as much of a human as a nontwitcher who is debating what personhood is with another nontwitcher.

This woman wants to polevault in academia by way of a clever modern update to the 3/5ths rule, if you say you're doing it for retarded people, you get to say what they want and vote twice on whether a paper is bad and oppressive or good and liberating.
Sounds like she wants philosophy to get the same improvements debate did:



I for one can't wait for the first treatise published in Ebonics.
 
You know, between Ethan Klein clowning on Vaush, and Gabe Hoffman fucking with Ralph, I've come to a very important conclusion regarding life, the universe, everything.
GOYIM ARE CATTLE


1708616036043.png

The Jews are FUCKING right, we goyim are incapable of managing ourselves, we require a firm Semitic guiding hand. Take my shekels, please.


DO IT AGAIN GUNNER HILA
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: Makoto Niijima
This is a bit fringe but I have discovered recently learning about disability rights a fun new article called "Complexity as Epistemic Oppression." The woman, who appears to be a natal woman cursed to have gotten her PhD or first teaching position in fucking Ohio has published a paper arguing that philosophy is too hard for people who can't read good.

View attachment 5745023
View attachment 5745025
View attachment 5745027

Epistemology is the subbranch of philosophy concerned with how we know what we know, and how and why we believe things. It's navel gazing at its finest, but it's also incredibly valuable for understanding difficult matters with complex and thorough reasoning about truth. This is an article published in a reputable journal of philosophy. Since philosophy is too complicated for the retarded, it is oppression. Philosophy needs more retards, even ones who can't speak or write. It is oppression to not include people who cannot communicate verbally in a profession that is at its core an insoluble language game. Twitching and drooling should be enough, and we should help twitchers and speak for them and consider them just as much of a human as a nontwitcher who is debating what personhood is with another nontwitcher.

This woman wants to polevault in academia by way of a clever modern update to the 3/5ths rule, if you say you're doing it for retarded people, you get to say what they want and vote twice on whether a paper is bad and oppressive or good and liberating.
See, this is wild. Because the biggest problem with philosophy is that it already has way too many retards involved with it...
 
I heard Lidl Drip is going straight to JAIL for gossiping about an e-celeb on an e-celeb gossip site. It's fucking over. It was fine to talk about everyone else, but COUNT DANKULA?! That is too fucking far! I'll have you know he officially removed the tranny cock from his mouth now that tides have officially turned against trannies, after simping for femboys and troons for years despite being married with children. Remember he once made his dog do a hitler salute so he is /our/guy and BASED and definitely does not fuck trannies anymore.

And also these pictures are now officially illegal to post, so don't.

View attachment 5744982
View attachment 5744983

This is DEFINITELY NOT your POV when you are Count Dankula arriving at his "office" to get help from his "assistant":

Have a sense of humor. He was hammered in half those pictures if I remember my TISM podcast lore right.
 
Back