It's one thing to point at a "nobody knows who this is" e whore being an e whore (and including lots of pictures, of course, to make your point - which is the new "read it for the articles" cope, mind you) and another to call a faggot a faggot.
Even if you take Tate at his most charitable possible reading - and goddamn I have to stretch to do this, but you can hammer his position into something that is somewhat akin to Aquinas [8] - he's still a slimy and dumbass faggot.
We can laugh at Greer when he actually makes a salient point in a court filing, not because it is right, but because we're surprised that he did it.
We most indubitably can laugh at faggots when they're being cockroach faggots.
[8] You really have to stretch it carefully, but
https://www.newadvent.org/summa/5064.htm#article8 Article 8 of Q 64,
I answer that implies that asking for payment of the marriage debt [89] for the sake of mere pleasure (as opposed out of fear of weakness of the flesh; e.g., if you don't bang her you'll go off and adultery or jack it) is a
more grievous sin but not mortal. In the language of a brain-damaged cockroach, "venial sin" could be read as "fucking gay, man" (though elsewhere Aquinas argues that faggotry is gay).
[89]
Usury on the Marriage Debt would be a good bandname.
