I saw this when I was young too, I didn't pick up so much on the ages of the actresses(?) of course but I do remember being creeped out the way they tried to make the creepy guy who films her into the good guy and that the only reason her dad doesn't fuck his daughter's high school friend is that she is a virgin and not you know, because she's a kid still in school.
Underage nudity is not automatically considered child pornography. It's complicated. The legal gist is, the movie is art and the nudity exists to complement the art, not to be obscene. You could, conceivably, do something with still images of it to cause problems for yourself, but it would be hard.
So thats how Nirvana got away with having baby dick on the cover of nevermind
There's a lot of examples of underage nudity in American media from the 60s up until about the 90s. I'm not really sure why and I've never bothered to look into it.
Mai Boi remembered his password just for one tweet.
That explains a lot. Sharon Stone had a bunch of underage nudity out there but there was no mistaking that she wasn't a young adult. She was 10-12 at most.
I hate this argument, firstly nude scenes are always super awkward whenever you watch with friends or family and often just completely unnecessary and forced into the movie. Secondly the movie is hardly going to be ruined if you just implied the nudity or sex scene with a more tasteful well cropped shot.
It's just the producers wanting to film an actress they are attracted to naked and also I guess it makes more men go to the movies, especially back when Internet pornography wasn't as easily accessible. Lots of movies include the producers fetishes in more or less subtle ways like Terrantino with his foot fetish.
