After the MATI segment on this guy's channel specifically when this video was briefly mentioned:
I watched the vid and was surprised that it wasn't just a lukewarm libshit take with the usual talking points, but was curiously from an anarchist standpoint with power politics being the primary lens of analysis. I would be interested to see what
@Null actual response to this would be instead the dismissive off-hand comment we got based on a second-hand "synopsis" that was reductionist at best. Despite me disagreeing with a lot of his points, he actually has a few valid ones that doesn't just boil down to "you should be nicer to trannies".
According to him, for the long-term prosperity the farms needs to:
1) Stop taking a purely defensive posture, and actively position people in seats of power in order to further our anti-censorship, pro-liberty ethos.
2) Button up public "calls to action" (like a tweet thread, substack or zerohedge article) with neutral language out of the pragmatic aim of building as big of a coalition as possible.
Point #2 while interesting I'm less keen on, since I think most normal people are already fed up with the tranny shit as-is. However Point #1 is making a lot of sense to me. A lot of these internet Liz Fong Jones-shaped problems aren't going to be solved by bitching and sending out lawsuits every so often. We need to start infiltrating some of these seats of power and put up an
offense instead of waiting for the fresh new annual gayop that fucks over the site. I'm not saying congressional seats or anything like that, but tech company positions, payment processor positions, and other internet backbone positions that can be used to actively counter the trannies. Just my two-cents.