"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

Life Is Strange: True Colors is coming out September 10 2021

A small town supernatural mystery. Alex Chen must uncover the truth behind her brothers death using her psychic power of empathy to unravel the shocking secrets of Haven Springs.

Can we expect a playthrough of this? @Null
ITS A FRIDAY TOO!
 
If someone can find his PO Box they are that much closer to his children. They can follow him home, they could mail him the bomb instead of throwing it through his window. I never said having your personal info online wasn't an issue. What I was having an issue with was Dankula explicitly stating terrorists were going to bomb his house because his address was posted on Kiwi Farms. That implies he thinks the users of this site are violent terrorists. I then also stated he would be just as likely to have someone attack him... because he's a public figure. He's been running for political office, having public meetings, and fighting a hate speech case that has been ongoing with an international following... for years.
A person could easily get some stupid tech toy or a trophy or something maybe a nazi pugg statue and stash a gps track in it and boom.

That fucking line to Null about "I would evade someone following me home" just fucking reeks of grade school play ground talk. Not something you d hear from a "public figure" comedy/politics take your pick.

Fuck at lest tim pool has a compound/guns and talks about his safty with out whining.

Edit: I kinda with it was 2018. Dank and Null go on the kill stream and hash this shit out while Dick makes jokes and ralph laughts.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: JoshPlz and waffle
Has anyone else mentioned for Josh's benefit that catholic theology contains the concept of "Invincible Ignorance" which essentially means it isn't your fault you didnt know about jesus if you couldn't have known.

Like everything in catholicism it has lots of exceptions and quantifying points, but it essentially means people who lived moral lives but could not have known about the church still have the opportunity for salvation.

One of the difficulties is in culture, where cultures who are invincibly ignorant of the church and believe it is acceptable to, eg. wantonly rape captured women. Committing mortal sins is a disqualifier from the invincible ignorance = salvation, the church does not believe in moral relativism, none of that 'its their culture to abuse women in short dresses'.

Some things to remember when looking at mortal sin are:
  • The church does not get to judge how bad something is, only god can do that, and god has perfect knowledge of the situation. They do offer guidance on what Gods take will be though.
  • Mortal sin is not strictly defined, it is affected by how bad it was, how aware you were of how bad it was, and how much you wanted to do it.
  • Theres a big list of 'grave actions' that could be mortal sins depending on the situation.
  • Mortal sins happen, there is always the chance for absolution for those who truly seek to repent.
tl:dr
The ignorant pre collumbian exchange mexicans would not automatically go to hell for not knowing about jesus, but also many of their cultures unashamedly promoted a lot of stuff that probably did not help their standing with God.
If Catholic God is real and allows only some of his children to have to struggle with concept of sin and forgiveness to get into Heaven and not get tossed into Hell unless they tow the line, whereas 98% of the rest of humanity over the past 2000 years gets a free pass because they didn't know any better because he didn't introduce his son the savior to them, unless they transgress unknowingly against the REAL baddie sins then they get to fry like a burger down south never even knowing why they are punished, then God is the biggest fucking cruel, careless and evil shitbag of a diety to ever exist.

It makes the Gnostic argument for a Demiurge sound fucking plausible.
 
Addresses have been public forever. This idea that nobody should ever know what your home is besides the government is a recent phenomena.
i think most dont take issue with linking a name to an address, it's more about linking an internet pseudonym to the IRL identity of the person operating it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ComedyEnjoyer
i think most dont take issue with linking a name to an address, it's more about linking an internet pseudonym to the IRL identity of the person operating it.
Nope. In Dankula's case, he thinks it should be a civil issue. People should own their address as some sort of trademark that they can file takedown notices over. In the tranny's case, they don't want their real birth names out there.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: DumbDude42
i think most dont take issue with linking a name to an address, it's more about linking an internet pseudonym to the IRL identity of the person operating it.
So I used to spend alot of time on the Somethingawful.com forums. Which got started back around 1999. There was a Poster in the politics forums called brown mosses. Who was basically a brit bong on the dole which allowed him to spend hours onling. During the Syrian Cival war he promoted some kinda "journalism" and or "research" from photos posted online. Now CNN and crew arent gonna quote someone internet handle with AV photo. So he started doing work and more importantly "promoting" himself under his real name.

The slow stripping of internet handles and screen names was encourage by the narcissism of social media, and draw of fame/money/clout.

I dont get how dank and people like him will complain about "doxing" and at the same time seek attention.
 
So I used to spend alot of time on the Somethingawful.com forums. Which got started back around 1999. There was a Poster in the politics forums called brown mosses. Who was basically a brit bong on the dole which allowed him to spend hours onling. During the Syrian Cival war he promoted some kinda "journalism" and or "research" from photos posted online. Now CNN and crew arent gonna quote someone internet handle with AV photo. So he started doing work and more importantly "promoting" himself under his real name.

The slow stripping of internet handles and screen names was encourage by the narcissism of social media, and draw of fame/money/clout.

I dont get how dank and people like him will complain about "doxing" and at the same time seek attention.
Because they think that government will miraculouly grant them the ability to control exactly what information that is out there.
As far as his training to detect "tails" goes I have no idea if it is effective nor if he uses it effectively, but it amazes me that he takes the (noble) step of taking a class for his "families" safety, yet doesn't follow that thought to its logical conclusion and realize their safety is his responsibility. Establishing some false sense of security from a government that despises him is incredibly unwise.
 
I wonder if people's weirdness about addresses comes from the conflicting messages they got growing up about how it's OK to have social media under your real name but also never give out your address on the internet because "bad stuff" will happen.

Idk man, the modern age has ruined the brains of a large percentage of the population.
 
I wonder if people's weirdness about addresses comes from the conflicting messages they got growing up about how it's OK to have social media under your real name but also never give out your address on the internet because "bad stuff" will happen.

Idk man, the modern age has ruined the brains of a large percentage of the population.
I think that is kinda part of it, I mean when I grew up on 56k modems and BBS the general rule of thumb is not to use your real name for anything and to this day I continue with that, banking, payments ect... are an exception.

Also another factor about addresses and doxes and why people don't like them is because maybe you do not give a shit when you are an angsty teen or young adult, when you get into a serious relationship and have kids the whole doxing and threats become a lot more real because its not just yourself you have to worry about. It is weird to me that people will complain about doxing and keeping private are also sometimes public figures or people who became notorious in online communities where their info is already made public by them themselves. This is why you will never catch me try to become e-famous or seek notoriety because I personally value my privacy.
 
People are no longer to brought up to have real values because that makes them harder for the globalists to control and comodify. They're thought that all values have limits, or need to be moderated to get along in society, or whatever else they need to beat into you to get you to compromise. If you're already compromising for the globalists, why shouldn't there be one more little compromise for the thing that would make you really happy?
 
Last edited:

Cross-posted from the Smash thread. Hax$'s response to all his backlash.

@Null Take this offering of lulz and please don't ban me for not archiving, I have to leave for work.
Archived, now you can't be banned :biggrin:
 
This is why you will never catch me try to become e-famous or seek notoriety because I personally value my privacy.
The problem with online "fame" is you can get all the notoriety and enemies a real celebrity gets, but usually without the money that buys you a layer of muscle, allows you to set up trusts to keep your actual location private, sophisticated burglar alarm systems, etc. And even real celebrities sometimes wake up to find some crazy stalker in their home.
 
I dont get how dank and people like him will complain about "doxing" and at the same time seek attention.
It's even more hypocritical of Dankula because he constantly posts (in a positive light) people going to Drachenlord's house (a German? Lolcow, we have a thread in international) and fucking with him in person. People go to his house and try to fight him or just generally antagonize. I'm pretty sure he recently said he was tempted to go over there.
 
It's even more hypocritical of Dankula because he constantly posts (in a positive light) people going to Drachenlord's house (a German? Lolcow, we have a thread in international) and fucking with him in person. People go to his house and try to fight him or just generally antagonize. I'm pretty sure he recently said he was tempted to go over there.
But it's okay if it's that guy. Then it's funny. Obviously it's not funny if it happens to him. Duuuuuuh!
 
being a hypocrite is only bad if you are trying to be consistent in your goals. if your goal is to advance yourself then being inconsistent with your stated principles isn't being hypocritical and therefore isn't bad.
But why is being a hypocrite bad anyways? like if savages captured and asked me to renounce Christianity and I renounce Christianity then no sin is committed because at the very moment I had the intention to renounce Christianity the church has excommunicated me and I am anathema. so in fact I was never Christian and therefore could not have renounced Christianity.
 
Back