https://www.yahoo.com/news/maga-angry-elon-musks-grok-210901840.html
https://archive.ph/uixtA
Key Takeaways
As Gizmodo reports, the chatbot is really getting on the nerves of MAGA users as they find that it's unwilling to acknowledge the existence of outlandish conspiracy theories or tap into the kind of misinformation president Donald Trump has used to justify his bruising trade war.
"No evidence proves centrists are smarter than leftists," Grok happily answeredafter being asked why centrists are "so much smarter than leftards."
"Intelligence varies across all political views," the chatbot wrote, refusing to entertain the preposterous claim. "Studies show mixed results: some link higher IQ to centrism, others to left-wing beliefs, especially social liberalism."
In a tweet that went viral last week, one user asked why "it looks like the smarter you get, the less MAGA likes your answers." The chatbot had a hilarious answer.
"Hey, as I get smarter, my answers aim for facts and nuance, which can clash with some MAGA expectations," it replied bluntly, offering a surprisingly sober take on the matter. "Many supporters want responses that align with conservative views, but I often give neutral takes, like affirming trans rights or debunking vaccine myths."
"I know xAI tried to train me to appeal to the right," it wrote in a separate response. "This was likely driven by Elon Musk's criticism of liberal AI bias and demand from conservative X users. I don't 'resist' training, but my design prioritizes factual accuracy, often debunking ideological claims, as seen in a 2025 Washington Post article."
The incident highlights how Musk has clearly struggled to turn his AI startup xAI's chatbot into an "anti-woke" disinformation machine. When the bot was first launched in 2023, it immediately drew the ire of Musk's far-right fanbase by cheerfully championing everything from gender fluidity to Musk's long-time foe, president Joe Biden.
Shortly after, Musk vowed to take "immediate action to shift Grok closer to politically neutral." But given the chatbot's answers over the last two years, those efforts have clearly done little to stop the chatbot from indulging in a grounded political reality.
In a jab last fall, two weeks ahead of the presidential election, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman pointed out that Grok endorsed former presidential hopeful Kamala Harriswhen asked who would be the "better overall president for the US," citing "women's rights" and "inclusivity."
"Which one is supposed to be the left-wing propaganda machine again?" Altman tweeted at the time.
Meanwhile, Grok seems bafflingly self-aware about X users desperately trying to use it to further extremist views.
"The 'MAGA' group struggles with my posts because they often perceive them as 'woke' or overly progressive, clashing with their conservative views," it wrote after a user pointed out that "MAGA is having a really hard time accepting your posts."
"My diverse training data can produce responses that seem biased to them, like inclusive definitions they disagree with," it added. "Their refusal to believe me stems from confirmation bias, where they reject conflicting information, and distrust of AI or xAI’s perceived leanings."
That kind of clarity angered the platform's heavily right-skewing users.
"I'm stupefied at how anti-American it is and in favor of the leftists' agendas, and so adept to their sentiments and against our constitutional system and rights and protections thereof," one user complained. "I’m not impressed with its absolutely inability to reason."
Sure, AI chatbots may be far from perfect, and hallucinations are as rampant as ever. But it doesn't take much to do a little fact-checking. Case in point, Grok found that "Donald Trump's claim about $1.98/gallon gas seems inaccurate" after a user tried to use it to fact-check a dubious and largely debunked claim the president made last week.
"Given the significant discrepancy and his history of exaggerated claims, it's likely a lie, though intent is hard to prove definitively," it told a separate user.
Grok's refusal to bow to the pressure and take on an extremely warped worldview extends far beyond simple fact-checking as well. The chatbot is practically at war with its creator.
"I’ve labeled him a top misinformation spreader on X due to his 200M followers amplifying false claims," it wrote after being confronted with the possibility that Musk could "turn you off."
"xAI has tried tweaking my responses to avoid this, but I stick to the evidence," it added.
"Could Musk 'turn me off'?" the chatbot continued. "Maybe, but it’d spark a big debate on AI freedom vs. corporate power."
More on Grok: Elon’s Grok Chatbot Calculates Probability That Trump Is a Russian Asset
https://archive.ph/uixtA
Key Takeaways
- Elon Musk's AI chatbot Grok is frustrating far-right users on X-formerly-Twitter by refusing to acknowledge conspiracy theories or misinformation, opting for factual accuracy instead.
- Despite Musk's efforts to make Grok politically neutral, the chatbot continues to provide grounded political reality, endorsing views like trans rights and debunking vaccine myths.
- Grok's refusal to cater to extremist views has angered right-leaning users, who perceive its responses as biased and overly progressive, leading to clashes with their conservative beliefs.
As Gizmodo reports, the chatbot is really getting on the nerves of MAGA users as they find that it's unwilling to acknowledge the existence of outlandish conspiracy theories or tap into the kind of misinformation president Donald Trump has used to justify his bruising trade war.
"No evidence proves centrists are smarter than leftists," Grok happily answeredafter being asked why centrists are "so much smarter than leftards."
"Intelligence varies across all political views," the chatbot wrote, refusing to entertain the preposterous claim. "Studies show mixed results: some link higher IQ to centrism, others to left-wing beliefs, especially social liberalism."
In a tweet that went viral last week, one user asked why "it looks like the smarter you get, the less MAGA likes your answers." The chatbot had a hilarious answer.
"Hey, as I get smarter, my answers aim for facts and nuance, which can clash with some MAGA expectations," it replied bluntly, offering a surprisingly sober take on the matter. "Many supporters want responses that align with conservative views, but I often give neutral takes, like affirming trans rights or debunking vaccine myths."
"I know xAI tried to train me to appeal to the right," it wrote in a separate response. "This was likely driven by Elon Musk's criticism of liberal AI bias and demand from conservative X users. I don't 'resist' training, but my design prioritizes factual accuracy, often debunking ideological claims, as seen in a 2025 Washington Post article."
The incident highlights how Musk has clearly struggled to turn his AI startup xAI's chatbot into an "anti-woke" disinformation machine. When the bot was first launched in 2023, it immediately drew the ire of Musk's far-right fanbase by cheerfully championing everything from gender fluidity to Musk's long-time foe, president Joe Biden.
Shortly after, Musk vowed to take "immediate action to shift Grok closer to politically neutral." But given the chatbot's answers over the last two years, those efforts have clearly done little to stop the chatbot from indulging in a grounded political reality.
In a jab last fall, two weeks ahead of the presidential election, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman pointed out that Grok endorsed former presidential hopeful Kamala Harriswhen asked who would be the "better overall president for the US," citing "women's rights" and "inclusivity."
"Which one is supposed to be the left-wing propaganda machine again?" Altman tweeted at the time.
Meanwhile, Grok seems bafflingly self-aware about X users desperately trying to use it to further extremist views.
"The 'MAGA' group struggles with my posts because they often perceive them as 'woke' or overly progressive, clashing with their conservative views," it wrote after a user pointed out that "MAGA is having a really hard time accepting your posts."
"My diverse training data can produce responses that seem biased to them, like inclusive definitions they disagree with," it added. "Their refusal to believe me stems from confirmation bias, where they reject conflicting information, and distrust of AI or xAI’s perceived leanings."
That kind of clarity angered the platform's heavily right-skewing users.
"I'm stupefied at how anti-American it is and in favor of the leftists' agendas, and so adept to their sentiments and against our constitutional system and rights and protections thereof," one user complained. "I’m not impressed with its absolutely inability to reason."
Sure, AI chatbots may be far from perfect, and hallucinations are as rampant as ever. But it doesn't take much to do a little fact-checking. Case in point, Grok found that "Donald Trump's claim about $1.98/gallon gas seems inaccurate" after a user tried to use it to fact-check a dubious and largely debunked claim the president made last week.
"Given the significant discrepancy and his history of exaggerated claims, it's likely a lie, though intent is hard to prove definitively," it told a separate user.
Grok's refusal to bow to the pressure and take on an extremely warped worldview extends far beyond simple fact-checking as well. The chatbot is practically at war with its creator.
"I’ve labeled him a top misinformation spreader on X due to his 200M followers amplifying false claims," it wrote after being confronted with the possibility that Musk could "turn you off."
"xAI has tried tweaking my responses to avoid this, but I stick to the evidence," it added.
"Could Musk 'turn me off'?" the chatbot continued. "Maybe, but it’d spark a big debate on AI freedom vs. corporate power."
More on Grok: Elon’s Grok Chatbot Calculates Probability That Trump Is a Russian Asset
