- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
Anyway, yeah, I am requesting an acc there. If I make one edit that isn't backed up by truth feel free to remove me. I have no interest in any other people you write about either.
Marijan Š Šiklić Article
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
-
🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
As stated. I have what I believe to be your real named based on a conversation you had with Encyclopedia Dramatica admins. I have nothing else to use and I need something for consistency. Everything I have that can be substantiated would indicate that this is your name.
You also have no reason to argue this point except to try and remove it from the document. If Šiklić wasn't your last name, I imagine you would go along with it just to seed a disassociation between your identities. Either this is really clever reverse psychology, or you're more concerned with the academic integrity of my wiki than you are your own name.
Done.
It means that your understanding of things are based off of personal experience and Internet forums, not anything academic.
The common thread of all your conversations ever is that you know women and men better than they do. This would make you either an insane person or an expert in human behavior and romance.
Given there are multiple accounts on this, including your own, but you also now deny it, that is pretty unclear and suspicious.
Yes it does. The first article is a croatian news report about you being arrested, the second is a blog post detailing your drama with various websites and people. Unfortunately a lot of the screencaps are lost.
You indisputably asked your mother for sex. To then go back and say "well I wouldn't have" is backtracking. Your argument here is centered on the word backtracking, and not the dissonance between your intent and your request. This to me is whitewashing.
I think that also sums up the gist of your requests. You want to whitewash absolutely everything that can't be validated on an academic level. @Rammspieler has confirmed these things and your drama stretches back like a decade. I can't attest that absolutely everything will be 100% true but for the average reader, you will come off as an insane misogynist who makes up personal inadequacies and wasted time by blaming others and blogging. The distinction between hating "modern women" and "modern western women" is about as important as if you "backtracked" a claim or just denied ever meaning it: not at all.
Giving you an account to edit your own page would accomplish two things:
1) An assurance that anything you don't like will be removed or worded such that it jives with your inane world view as much as possible.
2) A platform to write a new manifesto about how much you hate women and sexually active men.
I don't want that. Nobody wants that.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
Null, what on earth are you rambling about?
"You also have no reason to argue this point except to try and remove it from the document. " - I absolutely do. You can't just post dumb names anyone could cook up. I'd do the same for any name you put up there. Any at all.
"It means that your understanding of things are based off of personal experience and Internet forums, not anything academic."
That's 1. not true, since I posted an entire long list of books and studies several times 2. can't be called research.
"The common thread of all your conversations ever is that you know women and men better than they do. This would make you either an insane person or an expert in human behavior and romance."
nope. just somebody who isn't indoctrinated by a hateful ideology of liberalism.
"Given there are multiple accounts on this, including your own, but you also now deny it, that is pretty unclear and suspicious."
WHOA, WHOA, WHOA??!! Where are these accounts that I blackmailed or paid a schizophrenic woman????
"Yes it does."
Umm, no. Nowhere does it say I had legal problems for being suicidal or attacking my mother.
"You indisputably asked your mother for sex. To then go back and say "well I wouldn't have" is backtracking. "
How? I said I never asked seriously.
"Rammspieler has confirmed these things "
Which things?
". I can't attest that absolutely everything will be 100% true"
But I can, if you want your wiki to be truthful. How I come across is irrelevant, unless your wiki is called "null's impressions" and it is you who spreads the hateful lie that women don't want to be massacred.
"Giving you an account to edit your own page would accomplish two things:
1) An assurance that anything you don't like will be removed or worded such that it jives with your inane world view as much as possible.
2) A platform to write a new manifesto "
No.
1) Anything that isn't correct would be removed. Whether I like something or not is irrelevant.
2) What?! I wouldn't write any manifestos on a wiki like that. I'd just fix the lies about myself. Also, your idea of what my manifesto is about is wrong.
"You also have no reason to argue this point except to try and remove it from the document. " - I absolutely do. You can't just post dumb names anyone could cook up. I'd do the same for any name you put up there. Any at all.
"It means that your understanding of things are based off of personal experience and Internet forums, not anything academic."
That's 1. not true, since I posted an entire long list of books and studies several times 2. can't be called research.
"The common thread of all your conversations ever is that you know women and men better than they do. This would make you either an insane person or an expert in human behavior and romance."
nope. just somebody who isn't indoctrinated by a hateful ideology of liberalism.
"Given there are multiple accounts on this, including your own, but you also now deny it, that is pretty unclear and suspicious."
WHOA, WHOA, WHOA??!! Where are these accounts that I blackmailed or paid a schizophrenic woman????
"Yes it does."
Umm, no. Nowhere does it say I had legal problems for being suicidal or attacking my mother.
"You indisputably asked your mother for sex. To then go back and say "well I wouldn't have" is backtracking. "
How? I said I never asked seriously.
"Rammspieler has confirmed these things "
Which things?
". I can't attest that absolutely everything will be 100% true"
But I can, if you want your wiki to be truthful. How I come across is irrelevant, unless your wiki is called "null's impressions" and it is you who spreads the hateful lie that women don't want to be massacred.
"Giving you an account to edit your own page would accomplish two things:
1) An assurance that anything you don't like will be removed or worded such that it jives with your inane world view as much as possible.
2) A platform to write a new manifesto "
No.
1) Anything that isn't correct would be removed. Whether I like something or not is irrelevant.
2) What?! I wouldn't write any manifestos on a wiki like that. I'd just fix the lies about myself. Also, your idea of what my manifesto is about is wrong.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
You're so noisy.
Like I literally could not fabricate a better quote to answer this question. It even reiterates that she's schizophrenic.
Based on this alone I am able to make the opinion that your revisionism would not be a good thing for the articles.
Right here.
Like I literally could not fabricate a better quote to answer this question. It even reiterates that she's schizophrenic.
Based on this alone I am able to make the opinion that your revisionism would not be a good thing for the articles.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
null, you don't seem to understand. this woman lives in a small maritime town about 150 miles away. i was offering her money to even pay for her trip.
do you now understand why my revisionism would be an extremely good thing? insane things like what you said here are all over any writing about me. in case of cephaloid i'd have to write around 30-40 long posts to fix all of his mistakes. how can you allow that crap to be on your wiki?
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
if you can't get something that basic right i think it would be extremely reasonable to allow me to make a truthful article. you made a silly mistake and made a fool out of yourself here.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
Okay, an offer. Write your own article. Just make it a forum post. Cite everything exactly like you expect me to. If you can write something that covers essential points without white-washing, I will use it or integrate it.
Before you even think of trying, consider what major points would include:
- Your views on women. If there's a distinction between "modern western women" and "primitive eastern women" (????) make them.
- Your views on men with the same as the above.
- Your views on "liberalism", what that is, why you don't like it, and how Hitler ties into it.
- Your arrest record. If you bullshit this I will throw out the entire article.
- The incident with your mother and therapist. Use gratuitous citations.
- Your history on the web and how you came to run coalpha or whatever. I want a full detail.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
What you need to understand is that nobody really cares to hear your side of the story because they see you as a loser and a madman and a rapist. Your account of things does not matter to readers. I can write and I can allow to be written anything I want, but I'm choosing to go for accuracy. There's simply too much that you write for me to keep track of it all so I have to rely on hearsay and interpretations. That is much easier than dealing with you. You are giving your position here, and my patience to deal with it, way too much credit.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
ok, i will do so under one condition. if you're satisfied you will remove all the lies about me? i will try really hard. this will take several weeks at least.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
my side of the story is irrelevant. facts are.
and hearsay and interpretations don't exist on the internet, especially when you have the person you're trying to slander talk about you.
i don't care how i am seen or called. i care about facts and nothing else.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
for example, i am proud that i think western women want and deserve rape, that i'm a racist, that i impregnated a sick woman. i am proud of these things. i will include all of it and more.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
You may want to write a piece at a time so that you are not disappointed
That is completely false. A first hand account of things are always nice but you absolutely have to doubt everything said. Nobody is gullible enough to believe everything they are told.
Then do it. Start small, like your racist views appear less developed and important to you than your misogynistic ones.
Just keep in mind that there are conflicting opinions. For instance I know you hate Eastern Europeans, but as a Croatian many people would say you are yourself Eastern European, which you deny. So expect edits to be made pointing this out in the final article.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
Why do you get an idea that I hate Eastern Europeans?
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
Anyway, yeah, I'll start small, since I doubt that the changes will be implemented. You just want to lie and slander-
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
yes, but if you want to doubt something i say you need actual proof for that. you can't just make up shit on the spot, like you made up the claim that i paid that girl to come here, when i paid her trip expenses.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
"
He never used the term "eastern women". Modern western women means women in countries of the cultural west- anglosphere, all of europe, parts of south america and asia.
Women are always attracted to the type of man that's most successful with other women. In Western societies these men are seducers, since providers are no longer needed.
Changes in modern society dating back from 1920s and possibly earlier created a society where women were no longer dependent on providers, which made them choose men who use seduction. These men were always seen as utter scum in sane societies and were despised and avoided by women.
These men lack co-operation and intelligence, just like they lack responsibility, so they can chase other men's wives and produce many kids the government takes care of.
With time, the overall intelligence will drop to a minute level and even seduction becomes too complicated for new feral generations. Thus the only thing they can grasp is simply raping a woman.
Of course, feminists support all the policies that lead to this, like alimony, child support, AA and everything else that eliminates the need for good men.
So, in a sense, feminists are in the long term against all non-rapists. Of course they are not aware of this nor would they ever see it that way but that's no big surprise, since feminists are idiots.
- Your views on women. If there's a distinction between "modern western women" and "primitive eastern women" (????) make them."
He never used the term "eastern women". Modern western women means women in countries of the cultural west- anglosphere, all of europe, parts of south america and asia.
Women are always attracted to the type of man that's most successful with other women. In Western societies these men are seducers, since providers are no longer needed.
Changes in modern society dating back from 1920s and possibly earlier created a society where women were no longer dependent on providers, which made them choose men who use seduction. These men were always seen as utter scum in sane societies and were despised and avoided by women.
These men lack co-operation and intelligence, just like they lack responsibility, so they can chase other men's wives and produce many kids the government takes care of.
With time, the overall intelligence will drop to a minute level and even seduction becomes too complicated for new feral generations. Thus the only thing they can grasp is simply raping a woman.
Of course, feminists support all the policies that lead to this, like alimony, child support, AA and everything else that eliminates the need for good men.
So, in a sense, feminists are in the long term against all non-rapists. Of course they are not aware of this nor would they ever see it that way but that's no big surprise, since feminists are idiots.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
Women in non-feminist countries still value providers and as such are more unlikely to be insane. Still, women are cruel and fickle creatures.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
"
FOUR TYPES OF MALES
There are basically four types of males or male mating strategies in the world.
ALPHA MALES
General description: These are dominant, strong men who are usually the leaders. Their intelligence and morality are less important but must have at least average intelligence and are often quite intelligent. Alphas are men like a Fortune 500 CEO, mafia leader like Tony Soprano or statesmen like Vladimir Putin.
Mating strategy: The way these males reproduce is by dominance/high status/strength.
Examples: a strong king, warrior etc (in the past), strong mafia leader, statesman, CEO of a Fortune 500 company
BETA MALES
General description: Weaker than alphas. Not suited for leadership positions. Providers. Their intelligence and morality are less important and while they’re almost always of average to good morality they don’t think about morality much. Their role as a provider requires them to usually have at least average intelligence.
Mating strategy: These men offer their resources for female emotional and sexual fidelity.
Examples: A good foot-soldier, worker, employee
OMEGA MALES
General description: Weakest type. They lack the respect of other men, except the most superficial “respect” from fellow idiots so they’re not fit to lead any organization aspiring for success. They are of low morals and often low intelligence. They don’t necessarily have to be stupid, but they are always immoral. However, since stupid omegas won’t care about child support they also won’t care about contraception, which means they will have as many children as they can. This means that being a stupid omega is currently the best type in terms of reproduction.
Mating strategy: These men use seduction. Their lack morals and often poor intelligence means they’re not fit for long-term relationships. Their evolutionary advantage is their immorality. Since they’re despised by all other types and are not in any alliance with them they will not hesitate to seduce other men’s girlfriends and wives.
Examples: Throughout most of history/ in societies that aren’t omega societies – a conniving man with a bad reputation for seducing women.
In omega societies/many current societies (and practically all Western ones) – an immoral, stupid deadbeat who gets women due to being a moron. For example, a PUA but not just them. Most men today are omegas.
COALPHA MALES
General description: Weaker than alphas but stronger than betas and omegas. Their possess a high level of intelligence and morality. But the fact that they’re smarter than betas is even a sort a hindrance to them in a modern society, as these men won’t be foolish enough to support a used up slut in her 30s and her child so no women will want them at all (I will explain why later).
Mating strategy: Mating strategies of these men depend on the kind of society they found themselves into, which will be explained very soon. In alpha societies these men are usually in position very similar to betas but if the alpha society hold values like intelligence and morality in relatively high regard they might be more attractive to women due to these qualities. But, their best mating strategy is to form a coalpha group, which assimilates both alphas and betas into a monogamous society where each man has a single wife and excludes omegas.
Examples: leading class in the golden periods of Athens, Roman Republic, England 1500-1800 AD, early USA, members of CoAlpha forums, any man with high intelligence and morals who wants increased co-operation between men.
Currently most successful males are omega males, due to government policies.
- Your views on men with the same as the above."
FOUR TYPES OF MALES
There are basically four types of males or male mating strategies in the world.
ALPHA MALES
General description: These are dominant, strong men who are usually the leaders. Their intelligence and morality are less important but must have at least average intelligence and are often quite intelligent. Alphas are men like a Fortune 500 CEO, mafia leader like Tony Soprano or statesmen like Vladimir Putin.
Mating strategy: The way these males reproduce is by dominance/high status/strength.
Examples: a strong king, warrior etc (in the past), strong mafia leader, statesman, CEO of a Fortune 500 company
BETA MALES
General description: Weaker than alphas. Not suited for leadership positions. Providers. Their intelligence and morality are less important and while they’re almost always of average to good morality they don’t think about morality much. Their role as a provider requires them to usually have at least average intelligence.
Mating strategy: These men offer their resources for female emotional and sexual fidelity.
Examples: A good foot-soldier, worker, employee
OMEGA MALES
General description: Weakest type. They lack the respect of other men, except the most superficial “respect” from fellow idiots so they’re not fit to lead any organization aspiring for success. They are of low morals and often low intelligence. They don’t necessarily have to be stupid, but they are always immoral. However, since stupid omegas won’t care about child support they also won’t care about contraception, which means they will have as many children as they can. This means that being a stupid omega is currently the best type in terms of reproduction.
Mating strategy: These men use seduction. Their lack morals and often poor intelligence means they’re not fit for long-term relationships. Their evolutionary advantage is their immorality. Since they’re despised by all other types and are not in any alliance with them they will not hesitate to seduce other men’s girlfriends and wives.
Examples: Throughout most of history/ in societies that aren’t omega societies – a conniving man with a bad reputation for seducing women.
In omega societies/many current societies (and practically all Western ones) – an immoral, stupid deadbeat who gets women due to being a moron. For example, a PUA but not just them. Most men today are omegas.
COALPHA MALES
General description: Weaker than alphas but stronger than betas and omegas. Their possess a high level of intelligence and morality. But the fact that they’re smarter than betas is even a sort a hindrance to them in a modern society, as these men won’t be foolish enough to support a used up slut in her 30s and her child so no women will want them at all (I will explain why later).
Mating strategy: Mating strategies of these men depend on the kind of society they found themselves into, which will be explained very soon. In alpha societies these men are usually in position very similar to betas but if the alpha society hold values like intelligence and morality in relatively high regard they might be more attractive to women due to these qualities. But, their best mating strategy is to form a coalpha group, which assimilates both alphas and betas into a monogamous society where each man has a single wife and excludes omegas.
Examples: leading class in the golden periods of Athens, Roman Republic, England 1500-1800 AD, early USA, members of CoAlpha forums, any man with high intelligence and morals who wants increased co-operation between men.
Currently most successful males are omega males, due to government policies.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014