Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?

  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
bungholio said:
190 + pages of arguing with him is a great idea, guys. 100 more and maybe you'll finally change his mind!
Click to expand...
Were just having fun with him at this point. He's like a human pinata with an endless supply of candy.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Saney
Holden said:
Why do you call me a rapist...
Click to expand...
Because you are a rapist. And a farm animal fucker, and a pussy, and a closet case and the reason your counrty can't have nice things.
as if that's a bad thing and not a worshipped holy cow by western women?
Click to expand...
Nearly 200 pages and you still can't spell worth a damn.
 
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: Saney, Da Pickle Monsta and The Dude
Ziltoid said:
I asked you this question before and I'm going to asked it again. Do you ever think that maybe you're too mentally unstable and emotionally immature to form an intimate relationship with someone?

I would like an answer this time, please.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure if he was capable of that kind of critical self-reflection this thread wouldn't be almost 200 pages long.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Dude
JULAY said:
You're like the wind-up doll at the fair that bleats out things on cue.
Click to expand...
yBHx2cL.png
 
Holden said:
This post is based on me supposedly believing you should have all these "freedoms" and that feminism and liberalism will lead us to paradise and not destruction.
But you should know by now that's not what I think.
Click to expand...
So is that a good reason to start fingering your own anus? Because I'm both aroused and confused. Help me?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: The Dude
Nirxsachit said:
Do you have any posts that we say that we want women to "mate with dumbasses who can't understand consent at all"? It seems more like wanting women to choose who they have sex with to me, than making them mate with people who don't understand consent.
Click to expand...
Have you read my July 22 article?
Anyway, if you haven't, briefly - women never choose that at all. They have no self-awareness for that. In a feminist society they don't need providers so they choose stupid men because such men are successful with women in feminist societies. Gradually the stupidity increases and you get a completely rape based society.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Saney, NobleGreyHorse, Ze Red Medic and 3 others
Holden said:
Have you read my July 22 article?
Anyway, if you haven't, briefly - women never choose that at all. They have no self-awareness for that. In a feminist society they don't need providers so they choose stupid men because such men are successful with women in feminist societies. Gradually the stupidity increases and you get a completely rape based society.
Click to expand...

Has your mom read your July 22 article?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Meowthkip and Da Pickle Monsta
Holden said:
Sorry, didn't reply before.

Rape as an act - In A Natural History of Rape, Randy Thornhill and Craig T. Palmer define rape as "Human copulation resisted by the victim to the best of her ability unless such resistance would probably result in death or serious injury to her or others she commonly protects." I agree with this definition and would add that homosexual rape is also possible, with the same requirement to resist to the best of your ability. But under no circumstances can a woman rape a man. This is also compatible with the common-law definition which is "carnal knowledge of a woman not one's wife, by force and against her will." Anything else is feminist corruption of justice. Nowadays a lot of people think lack of consent is sufficient, but that is something I can never accept. Rape is sex accomplished by force, and that means the victim has to resist to the best of her ability; otherwise she is letting him have it. There needs to be a causal relationship between the violence and the sex, and that is not the case if the woman doesn't bother to resist to the best of her ability. Pretending women also can be rapists is a red herring employed by feminists to obfuscate the harm done to men by feminist rape law reform, to get useful idiot males to legitimize their persecution of men.

Rape as a crime - was always directed against chaste or married woman. It was a property crime against woman's father or husband. It never applied to sluts. Female whims like "consent" were rrelevant.
Click to expand...
So you say that women "love rapists" and love and adore rape... how is this possible when, as you said, rape is resisting human copulation to the best of 'her' ability? Why would she resist something she loved and adored? Why resist something you love? You also say that like a HUGE percentage of women get raped all the time. So are you honestly saying that most sexual occurrences are a woman actively resisting a man? Seriously? Do you believe you are a product of rape?
 
Cephalometrist said:
You misapply a valid definition of rape by ignoring a significant part of it and excluding female rape victims who would be classified as rape victims according to that definition because they are "sluts".
You either have an enormous cognitive disability or you are just an extremely vile creature.
Click to expand...
Duuuuuuudee !!
Thse definitions talk about the ACT, not a CRIME.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Saney, NobleGreyHorse, Da Pickle Monsta and 2 others
Holden said:
Have you read my July 22 article?
Anyway, if you haven't, briefly - women never choose that at all. They have no self-awareness for that. In a feminist society they don't need providers so they choose stupid men because such men are successful with women in feminist societies. Gradually the stupidity increases and you get a completely rape based society.
Click to expand...
I dismiss your entire line of reasoning on the grounds that you have no evidence to back it up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back