Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

[The I Scream Man]

We're really gonna hit a thousand pages of this complete idiot trying to tell us up is down and that "the sky is actually orange but you all collectively as well as the rest of the world are too dumb to see it", aren't we.

 

[Cubanodun]

@Holden now fuck religious girls

and the "I want to harm a society where something this crazy could even be asked." was pathetic

yes, he is keeping the stupid history about the 27/12 even when he was here with us

 

[Silver]

so im not following this thread really but i saw some mentions that perhaps holden actually legitimately raped someone??? someone quote/tag me and explain plz

 

[Holy wait what?]

please don't respond by accusing me of lying or having some small sample. all of that has already been debunked.

You saying "nu-uh" doesn't mean something is debunked... debunking something involves (hey, there's that word that you think means exactly the same as Evolve) providing EVIDENCE that it is wrong.

Kinda like the way your claim that you would have been married by 18 pre-60's is debunked by the way that the average age for marriage has remained above 26 for more than 400 fucking years... That's how you debunk something.

Which means your claim to have debunked accusations of lying... is a lie. (which proves you're lying, making the accusations... true.)

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

No no no, we openly ask why would somebody even want one with you. Big difference there.

then we've obviously been reading different topics

 

[DrChristianTroy]

i'm offering a special challenge. give me 3 normal, reasonable posts/questions and you get a preview of my new, upcoming post on the blog.

Wait dude tried to control the conversation. After he was Ja Rule'd by TJ? Shit son it's like you keep getting dumber.

EDIT- Scratch that. Between "EVERYTHING IS SEDUCTION" to not knowing how the reply button works @Holden has to be getting dumber. There's just no getting around it.

So @Holden, why didn't you address the fact that we found pictures of your ugly mug? Just kind of pussed out. Was doxing @flossman too exhausting for ya and you just quit?

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Kinda like the way your claim that you would have been married by 18 pre-60's is debunked by the way that the average age for marriage has remained above 26 for more than 400 fucking years... That's how you debunk something.

now, that's how you prove you're insane, since 1. this doesn't mean all of them were forced to marry at that age - some just chose to later, which i probably wouldn't, since i was always interested in serious relationships 2. i am not from uk

 

[Coldgrip]

How's your mom?

 

[DrChristianTroy]

now, that's how you prove you're insane, since 1. this doesn't mean all of them were forced to marry at that age - some just chose to later, which i probably wouldn't, since i was always interested in serious relationships 2. i am not from uk

Top five, dead or alive. You wanted reasonable questions why don't you answer them?

 

[RequiredName]

Mr. @Holden, your validity becomes dubious when so much as asking you a question causes you to retreat without even answering them.

 

[Holy wait what?]

so im not following this thread really but i saw some mentions that perhaps holden actually legitimately raped someone??? someone quote/tag me and explain plz

Ah, you refer to the way he tried to have sex with someone, she insisted on a condom, he said it makes him uncomfortable... so she said no, at which point he posted pictures (yes, multiple... so says his blog) along with her real... god only knows what. The only thing that makes any sense in that context is her real information, though @Holden tried claiming it really meant that he posted pictures and her "for real!"... which he posted to punish her for not having sex with him.

After letting her know* about this, she agreed to have sex if he took that shit down. Coercion at it's best (worst?) and he does have his blog where he admits it's blackmail.

He claims that she bought him Chocolate(s)** afterwards, which means it's not rape at all, honest, even though he admitted it was blackmail...

All that assumes that he's telling the truth about her... given that he did so badly that she's now a lesbian, and apparently his BFF, and apparently he's in very regular contact with her despite having cut off contact with all his friends... it really does not ring true at all. Oh, and allegedly thinks the accusations of him blackmailing her into sex is insane despite @Holden's blog saying that's exactly what he did.***

*He has claimed that she contacted him first, while also claiming it was posted on an obscure blog that no-one would see... which makes you wonder how she found out about it.
**He can't decide if it was one chocolate or a lot of chocolates... I know, it's not the kind of thing you really remember, but given the number of details he's tried to claim for this, it's a discrepancy that needs an explanation.
***His blog being the only source for any of the claims regarding this woman and most of what he terms "facts" doesn't lead to any kind of confidence in the accuracy of his claims.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Mr. @Holden, your validity becomes dubious when so much as asking you a question causes you to retreat without even answering them.

you do know it would be a waste of time to answer most of the questions here, which are trolling?

Ah, you refer to the way he tried to have sex with someone, she insisted on a condom, he said it makes him uncomfortable...

you failed to even make your first sentence correct. truly a trustworthy source. everyone, believe what this lunatic is saying.

 

[DrChristianTroy]

you do know it would be a waste of time to answer most of the questions here, which are trolling?

How so? Top five can tell a lot about someone's character. Or how about you going "You haven't seen me" despite pictures being posted multiple times. You want to engage but as soon as we do you retreat like a coward. Essentially, man up. No wonder your parents didn't introduce you to girls, you would just puss out anyway.

 

[Lalala]

you failed to even make your first sentence correct. truly a trustworthy source. everyone, believe what this lunatic is saying.

So whats the true story then? Two people unrelated have mentioned an incident and there's no smoke without fire.

 

[Holy wait what?]

now, that's how you prove you're insane, since 1. this doesn't mean all of them were forced to marry at that age - some just chose to later, which i probably wouldn't, since i was always interested in serious relationships

Ah, now we've got somewhere... you've dropped the whole "would" and instead started using "Probably".

You admit that you might not have been married by 18... which just demolished any claim you might make about how you would be married by 18. (which was the point I was making, fuckwit)

2. i am not from uk

And? That means nothing since it is a debunking of your claim that pre-feminism everyone would be married by 18. I think that 1600CE is WAY before Feminism.

Of course, since it debunked 2 of your claims, how does it make anyone except you... insane? (you never explain how, you just assert... did you learn that when studying History?)

And did you quit or were you fired?

 

[Coldgrip]

you failed to even make your first sentence correct.

The hypocrisy of that statement...

truly a trustworthy source.

Prove him wrong Rape Ape.

everyone, believe what this lunatic is saying.

Says the raving lunatic.

 

[DrChristianTroy]

Ah, now we've got somewhere... you've dropped the whole "would" and instead started using "Probably".

You admit that you might not have been married by 18... which just demolished any claim you might make about how you would be married by 18. (which was the point I was making, fuckwit)

And? That means nothing since it is a debunking of your claim that pre-feminism everyone would be married by 18. I think that 1600CE is WAY before Feminism.

Of course, since it debunked 2 of your claims, how does it make anyone except you... insane? (you never explain how, you just assert... did you learn that when studying History?)

And did you quit or were you fired?

"This is clearly trolling so I won't answer."
- @Holden's defense (with better grammar)

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

[QUOTE="Holden, post: 514365, member: 4670]


you failed to even make your first sentence correct. truly a trustworthy source. everyone, believe what this lunatic is saying.

So whats the true story then? Two people unrelated have mentioned an incident and there's no smoke without fire.[/QUOTE]
I haven't read his entire post but that's not what I told her. The crux of the story, however, is that it is completely irrelevant what I told her, since her changes of mind, as confessed by her about a month later (when we were already in a relationship) were fake, designed to mess with me, and had absolutely nothing to do with anything I was saying. I do remember now that I wrote about entering a relationship with her with her doing this, but I seemed to forgot to emphasize that I didn't know that she did this on purpose at the time (sadly, even if I knew I'd still date her).

As for another girl I had sex some months later, I admit I did try to blackmail her at first but the moment she asked for things to give me sex and I accepted this it stopped being blackmail.

I am not saying this to try and justify myself. I don't think like you. Had I really blackmailed them or raped them I'd proudly proclaim so here. Some skank's consent is nothing. I don't think like a regular brainwashed joe. But that alone might be a good indication that I am telling the truth about these cases.

 

[DrChristianTroy]

Hard to believe a sped like you when they can't figure out the quote function. All cred is lost there.

 

[Holy wait what?]

you failed to even make your first sentence correct. truly a trustworthy source. everyone, believe what this lunatic is saying.

Oh fucking really?

Must suck when you get caught out lying.... again...

I haven't read his entire post but that's not what I told her.

Must really fucking suck when your own blog post shows you to be a liar...

"This is clearly trolling so I won't answer."
- @Holden's defense (with better grammar)

Or he'll just declare it insane without explain WHY... and to that I say...

Just calling me this doesn't make it so.

and...

make arguments, not insults.