Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
You idiot. I was calling somebody a liar for c/p lies that can easily be proven wrong , like that incel wasn't mentioned in scientific studies.

You are calling me a liar for saying truths you don't like but can't prove me wrong, since I am talking about events from my life.

YOUUUR LYIING I NEVER HIT YOO!!!

YOUR TEARING ME APAAART COLDGRIP!!!!
 
It isn't, since women have no empathy for men but men have empathy for women. You can't have equality that way. Men and women are different.

Maybe it's just that no woman has had empathy for YOU. Which is hardly surprising. Stop painting everybody with the same brush. Men and women are different, yes, but that doesn't invalidate women's opinions.

It's only you who believes opinions are invalid when they don't line up with your batshit insane philosophy, which you only built up because waah waah my girlfriend left me
 
The problem with Islam is fundamentalism. But this fundamentalism happened only after Islamic liberalism, which destroyed Islam more. They even had female judges for a while.
Wouldn't that problem of fundamentalism be more with those that want power to rule over others? Having female judges through Islamic liberalism wouldn't really hurt Islam unless said judges were corrupt. Even then, man or woman, their sex wouldn't matter since corruption doesn't care about the sex of the individual it corrupts.
 
You are calling me a liar for saying truths you don't like but can't prove me wrong, since I am talking about events from my life.
The fact that things have gone a certain way in your life doesn't make those things universal truths. Most black people I personally have met are ghetto trash, but I don't think that all blacks are.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Nyxem
Do you have proof of that? Actual, published scientific proof. Not, say, blog posts for example.\

Things like empathy are notoriously difficult to measure, but just look at how women react to a man crying and vice versa. Also, a good argument for that is tribalism. where men had to take care for all but women only for children and other women.

Women have empathy for children and other women, but not men.
 
You idiot. I was calling somebody a liar for c/p lies that can easily be proven wrong , like that incel wasn't mentioned in scientific studies.

You are calling me a liar for saying truths you don't like but can't prove me wrong, since I am talking about events from my life.

You asked for a quote where people showed that calling someone a liar was basically the basis of your argument strategy. We gave it to you. What the fuck else do you want?
 
It isn't, since women have no empathy for men but men have empathy for women. You can't have equality that way. Men and women are different.

You actually believe women have no empathy for men??? The fuck, man.

The problem with Islam is fundamentalism. But this fundamentalism happened only after Islamic liberalism, which destroyed Islam more. They even had female judges for a while.

Yes, feminism destroyed Islam. God damn it, can't ever let women have any positions of power, lest we get Islamic fundamentalism shoved down our throats. :roll:
 
Wouldn't that problem of fundamentalism be more with those that want power to rule over others? Having female judges through Islamic liberalism wouldn't really hurt Islam unless said judges were corrupt. Even then, man or woman, their sex wouldn't matter since corruption doesn't care about the sex of the individual it corrupts.
The problem is that liberalism destroys a society's intellectual capacity. Almost all the posters here are from WBC of liberalism. It's not hard for a society whose youth had been so destroyed to turn to other forms of fundamentalism, since progressive liberalism is also a form of fundamentalism.

I won't even go into female judges now.
 
Things like empathy are notoriously difficult to measure, but just look at how women react to a man crying and vice versa. Also, a good argument for that is tribalism. where men had to take care for all but women only for children and other women.

Women have empathy for children and other women, but not men.

It's notoriously difficult to measure, so now I will proceed to measure the entire female population.

If it's so notoriously difficult, could it be that your findings are -gasp- WRONG!?

Perish the thought!
 
Things like empathy are notoriously difficult to measure, but just look at how women react to a man crying and vice versa. Also, a good argument for that is tribalism. where men had to take care for all but women only for children and other women.

Women have empathy for children and other women, but not men.
I'm a man and I cry for women's sympathy all the time. That's my own personal experience and you can't prove it wrong.
 
No you didn't, you're deluded if you think you did.

The closest thing you have ever come to causing some one relationship issues is deciding if your going to beat yourself off with your right hand or left hand.

Neither, he uses a Fleshlight and gets free protein in exchange. :eli:
 
Sorry, no matter how you try to deny things you don't like you are not able to. Why don't you deny everything I ever said?

You know the only way you could get me to believe your claim is this, i would need the clouds the part a whole quire of angels to sing and God to hand me a signed affidavit stating that the events took place, and even then I would ask to see the cctv footage just to be sure he isn't bending the truth a bit.

Your a tragic excuse of a man, I think you an Vade would make good couple maybe your toxic natures will cancel each other out.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GREEDY FIREMAN
Things like empathy are notoriously difficult to measure, but just look at how women react to a man crying and vice versa. Also, a good argument for that is tribalism. where men had to take care for all but women only for children and other women.

Women have empathy for children and other women, but not men.

I finally got around to reading your manifesto. It's very well written and you made some great points. I have a few questions and a bit of a review but I'm going to spoiler it so I don't leave a huge wall of text.

nOXFxxe.gif
 
Things like empathy are notoriously difficult to measure, but just look at how women react to a man crying and vice versa. Also, a good argument for that is tribalism. where men had to take care for all but women only for children and other women.

Women have empathy for children and other women, but not men.

Well maybe you should not burst into tears when trying to blackmail women into touching your shrivelled serb-duck. that tends to sap any empathy they might have for you as a mentally stunted manbaby
 
It's notoriously difficult to measure, so now I will proceed to measure the entire female population.

If it's so notoriously difficult, could it be that your findings are -gasp- WRONG!?

Perish the thought!
Like I said, these aren't hard sciences like chemistry where something either is or isn't. What if you're wrong?
 
Things like empathy are notoriously difficult to measure, but just look at how women react to a man crying and vice versa. Also, a good argument for that is tribalism. where men had to take care for all but women only for children and other women.

Women have empathy for children and other women, but not men.
So you really think all women think male tears are delicious? You must be ignorant if you think that not all women can have empathy for a man. Empathy itself involves sharing the same feeling that others are going through. A man losing someone close to him can receive empathy from a woman who gone through the same thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back