Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
You're a fool. None of these men ever needed seduction. They'd get wives anway. In fact, in cases of Casanova and Henry seduction just messed up their lives.

But see how an ordinary, poor man would pass if he used seduction. He'd be killed, and rightly so.

Without seduction, Giacomo Casanova would have been able to stay in the Republic of Venice and not live his life as a fugitive. Without seduction, King Henry the VIII would have never been able to impregnate Anne Boleyn and father Queen Elizabeth I, who was necessary in the colonisation of the New World. As for Arouet - otherwise known as Voltaire - without seduction most of his literary works would have never been written. Seduction fuels art, you ignorant worm, and it fueled progress in a time where progress was needed.

Seduction now is just a word used by men to describe how they met a tranny on Craigslist without embarrassing themselves.
 
Holy shit, this guy is a nutcase and seems like he could actually be dangerous.

You need to be in an asylum dude. You are royally fucked up.

I don't say this lightly, but you really should kill yourself.
your nickname suits you fine

@Holden u didn't ask my question how do you feel about Serbs I am one
I love them. My ancestors are from there and I visit Belgrade every once in a while. I'd want to move maybe but it's expensive.
 
Without seduction, Giacomo Casanova would have been able to stay in the Republic of Venice and not live his life as a fugitive. Without seduction, King Henry the VIII would have never been able to impregnate Anne Boleyn and father Queen Elizabeth I, who was necessary in the colonisation of the New World. As for Arouet - otherwise known as Voltaire - without seduction most of his literary works would have never been written. Seduction fuels art, you ignorant worm, and it fueled progress in a time where progress was needed.

Seduction now is just a word used by men to describe how they met a tranny on Craigslist without embarrassing themselves.

Your examples
- great loss lol
- you're dumb to think this depended on a single person
- sure, some evil things make good art. but where would france be if the peasants and workers used it as well at the time?

I'm actually not autistic, but I have a family member who suffers from it. You show heavy signs as well. Are you diagnosed?
Nope. Been told I am anything but.

how do i change my avatar. this red shit is messing with my eyes.
 
Why does everyone need to be killed? That's not a healthy attitude, young man.
So I admit I generalized you about the pua thing, but you're still a rotten misogynist fucker inside who is never getting laid. That's apparent to anyone who can read your bullshit.
-Never said that
-If by misogynist you mean wanting women to have dignity....
- I have gotten laid in the past
 
I am not ignorant about straight ones
Since every heterosexual female who gets laid on a regular basis is a slut secretly craving to be raped and abused and every heterosexual male who gets laid on a regular basis is a rape ape according to you, I really have my doubts about that.
 
What is the opposite of autism? Srs. I don't mean "hating Thomas the Tank Engine". How can you be "anything but"?
I don't know. Just what they said.

Since every heterosexual female who gets laid on a regular basis is a slut secretly craving to be raped and abused and every heterosexual male who gets laid on a regular basis is a rape ape according to you, I really have my doubts about that.
You're strawmanning me somewhat, though I can even understand it because I used to say something similar in anger.

Basically, what achieves more success than abuse or violence is seduction. But not everybody can use that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your examples
- great loss lol
- you're dumb to think this depended on a single person
- sure, some evil things make good art. but where would france be if the peasants and workers used it as well at the time?

Your rebuttal
-rife with fallacies
-barely even a rebuttal at all
-naïve

We attribute things in history to one person because that one person was crucial in that point in history. Do you really think we're going to name every fucking soldier that crossed the Rubicon? Do you really think we're going to name every last tribesmen that fought under Vercengétorix against the Roman conquest of Gaul? No one is going to believe that only one person is responsible for all this shit that's happened in history; it takes another idiot to accuse someone of believing that (which would be you), and frankly I don't think you have a tight enough grip on history at all if you think any of that had anything to do with the French Revolution. My gods, you are just 32 flavours of stupid.
 
Actually it is, according to you anything more polite then beating and raping them is "seduction" including when done by socially awkward shy spergs like myself. We're just trying to get to know you bro you don't have to be so aggro all the time.
I never said that. I used to be polite but that alone wasn't good enough and couldn't have been called seduction. And actually I had quite good passive seduction thanks to looks but couldn't achieve much more because I wasn't immoral or stupid enough.
 
You're strawmanning me somewhat, though I can even understand it because I used to say something similar in anger.

Basically, what achieves more success than abuse or violence is seduction. But not everybody can use that.

You certainly can't.
 
-Never said that
-If by misogynist you mean wanting women to have dignity....
- I have gotten laid in the past

- in the past three pages (so in the last twenty minutes), you've mentioned two groups you feel need to be killed. It's right there.
- no one is obligated to conform to what you expect they should be.
- mommy? Or is that just a rumor? Serious question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Randall Fragg
Your rebuttal
-rife with fallacies
-barely even a rebuttal at all
-naïve

We attribute things in history to one person because that one person was crucial in that point in history. Do you really think we're going to name every fucking soldier that crossed the Rubicon? Do you really think we're going to name every last tribesmen that fought under Vercengétorix against the Roman conquest of Gaul? No one is going to believe that only one person is responsible for all this shit that's happened in history; it takes another idiot to accuse someone of believing that (which would be you), and frankly I don't think you have a tight enough grip on history at all if you think any of that had anything to do with the French Revolution. My gods, you are just 32 flavours of stupid.
You list no reasons to why my rebuttal is that.
Your text below that is crazy as shit. You missed my point completely, which is that somebody else would just colonize the same, at that time or some other. This didn't depend on Elizabeth alone. Things wouldn't change much, if at all. Idiot.

You're anything but autistic? I'm curious about the circumstances around someone being told that they're anything but autistic. How does that even come up in conversation?
We talked about how it's a common diagnosis in the West and I said I sometimes think I have some traits. But the shrink said I am anything but that,
 
Do you actually listen to women or talk to them before assigning their personalities to them? Genuinely wondering. You seem to think that every woman is the same, likes the same things, etc.
 
Basically, what achieves more success than abuse or violence is seduction. But not everybody can use that.
You know, you are right that seduction is worth more than violence, but you wouldn't actually understand how to use that to your advantage. If you want "revenge" on a girl, give her an orgasm, and then two more. Then never call her again.
Seduction = power = control. You CAN learn to use it, but you won't because you're just too smart. I already talked about how people with higher IQs are often virgins far longer than those with average IQs, and when you can understand why, maybe things will change for you. Even if you aren't a virgin, it will still help you get better.

You're anything but autistic? I'm curious about the circumstances around someone being told that they're anything but autistic. How does that even come up in conversation?
An autistic person can be smart in other ways. He is opposite of autistic because he's full blown retrded.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You list no reasons to why my rebuttal is that.
Your text below that is crazy as shit. You missed my point completely, which is that somebody else would just colonize the same, at that time or some other. This didn't depend on Elizabeth alone. Things wouldn't change much, if at all. Idiot.
So, the British colonies, and by extension America never existing, wouldn't change much?
I think you're the idiot here.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Coldgrip
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back