Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

[Marjan Šiklić]

But is she ok with you beating her

Not really, but it pales compared to other things.

Actually it's quite important. Tell us about your childhood, please.

I don't see why is it important or why would I tell it to a bunch of morons?

It's even funnier how you can't even argue correctly.

Do you have an example of this? An actual one?

 

[namazuros]

It's funny how you can't even mock somebody correctly.

What part of my mockery was incorrect? Do you actually get dates?

 

[The Dude]

You're inventing nonsense again. I can approach women. What inadequacies? Like not being a rapist? Didn't you claim that is wrong?

Ahem...

They never helped me with my LS phobia. In 2004 I had chances of meeting at least 5 girls IRL. I could have fucked a teenage model. She asked me to fuck her. But thanks to my phobia I never got the chance to meet any.

I first met a girl in 2006, when it was already too late.

It had nothing to do with my mother not giving me sex.

Do you have an example of this? An actual one?

You're not very good at this, are you.

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

I don't see why is it important

Are you saying that you're not intelligent enough to understand his motives? Because most of us can easily understand why he's asking you questions about your childhood.

 

[Cephalometrist]

Ah, the ride never ends.

Are you seriously comparing a society with some female rulers, all of who depended on men and were succeded my men, with female suffrage? Wow.

Well, you are doing it the entire time, when you lust for some romanticised version of Ancient Rome and the great society they had back then, so what's wrong with that? The question why women's suffrage is inherntly bad (which doesn't exclude males from participation in politics, by the way) still remains unanswered.

Of course there wasn't, since Republic was sane

What happened then (and please be a bit more wordy than "liberalism happened", I'll explain to you why below)

But Empire wasn't and would have given it, had it been a democracy

Again, there is absolutely zero evidence that something like this might have happened. You are jumping to conclusions because you equate "downfall" with "liberalism".

They want a right to cheat on their husband and be paid and protected by the govt to do so.

All women? Even explicitly conservative ones who think a woman's main task should be running the household and raising the children? And as far as I know, every worker is protected by government and legislature to a certain degree, regardless of their sex. So why is this something that outrageous?

There was no reason for women to stay in the workforce.

Well, you brought up one major argument for that yourself: Both partners working actually means more income. Other than that geriatric care has been professionalised and elderly are no longer reliant on a family member always being within reach, mass production of devices that facilitate doing chores, an overall a higher standard of living and most importantly (it's probably not convincing to you though) the choice of the woman herself to stay in the workforce.

What I call liberalism is really progressivism today.

Oh for fuck's sake, replacing one meaningless buzzword with another one isn't going to help anybody here. Now listen: every political belief/ideology is the product of a certain time and its specific social, economic and cultural circumstances. As such, the categories they use are reliant on those circumstances (socialism and its use of the term "classes", overall post-Enlightenment political theory and its use of the term "reason" (as opposed to "cosmos" or "God")).
Now every one of these terms is ideologically charged, but you can still use them for your own worldview if you use them in a purely descriptive manner (which is why "classes" has become an established term). Now, the way you use the "term" liberalism" is completely devoid of any concrete reference to historical circumstances and is pretty much just a different way to pass judgement on a certain development in history that you don't seem to like. Your "liberalism" is pretty much Iconoclast's "change", useful for you maybe in order to find some ominous root of all evil, not very useful in discussions though.

I made a mistake there. Shouldn't have been "late Ancient Greek philosophers"

So who did you mean?

mass rape and destruction of sane,intelligent people not good enough for you?

Please don't expect me to read all of that. Copy the passages that prove that acknowledging female personhood automatically leads to mass rape and destruction and I'm more than willing to commentate on that.

What? What does this have to do?

I just loved the word "quality" when you described human beings, but I'm not going to start a discussion about pedagogics here.

Seducers were always stupid human vermin who can't even hold a job, EVEN IF IT WOULD WANT TO

You claim that the vast majority of males are seducers and then you say that they can't even hold a job? A bit strange, don't you think? The economy would be in a worse shape than it is today, if that were the case.
And by the way: I thought the rise of the seducers was tied to the rise of feminism. But now it seems that there has always been a majority of heartless seducers raping left and right and a few remaining nice guy providers longing for their sweethearts.

It does. Research has shown this lately.

Could you provide us with a link?

 

[Pinhead]

I don't see why is it important or why would I tell it to a bunch of morons?

Why would you tell us anything? Was your childhood that bad that the only place you can feel loved is in the company of people who openly mock you?

Do you have an example of this? An actual one?

Well, aside from the fact that you ignore questions you don't have a valid answer to, nearly every one of your posts contradicts a previous one. And you call US morons.

 

[Cuck Norris]

Irrelevant.

How so? It's good for comparison to determine if there may be a genetic factor to your particular "brand" of 'tism.

 

[ON 190]

Do you have an example of this? An actual one?

What's your favorite flavour of ice cream?

 

[The Dude]

@Holden did you have any siblings growing up? Or any pets? How was your relationship with them?

@Holden Also, did your parents have any children who lived?

 

[littlebiscuits]

Not irrelevant at all. I see where he's going with this line of questioning.

"She" not he

I don't see why is it important or why would I tell it to a bunch of morons?

I think it's perfectly obvious why I'm asking you this. Surely someone of normal to average intelligence would understand! Now tell me, did you have a normal childhood? Was it happy?

 

[The Dude]

What's your favorite flavour of ice cream?

That's easy. It's gRAPE.

 

[ON 190]

@Holden will you go to prom with me?

 

[RP 520]

I don't see why is it important or why would I tell it to a bunch of morons?

To set records straight and clear up any misconceptions. To better understand who you are and what past, maybe childhood events led you to become who you are now.

 

[Pinhead]

That's easy. It's gRAPE.

I thought it was Boys-enberry.

 

[drtoboggan]

If I don't do that and can't use seduction I can't succeed. That's it. Why can't you understand that?

So you won't even look for a third option? That's why I'm better than you: I refuse to roll over and I adapt. And, unlike you, I use my assets. If you got off your rape/seduction binary, you could too.

 

[Coldgrip]

Okay, serious question @Holden, would you date this woman?

She's single and just might be on board with your way of thinking.

 

[Frank Rizzo]

At this point, it's pretty much useless for TJ Church to try and stop this. Unless Teej does something epic/grand in the next day or two, he's no longer the star lolcow here...

 

[For The Internet]

But here's the thing - in most parts of the world it isn't even few generations. My country wasn't feminist until like ten years ago. Slut generation in the 60s didn't include all American women, especially not those from rural areas. These things take time.

Also, has there been any research about this? Maybe it's already starting.

Coldgrip - your "proof" doesn't even mention rape.

Pinhead - I am talking lookswise.

As far as I know there hasn't been any research, which is why I suggested you look into it. As I've previously said, scientific data certainly helps with credibility. People are more likely to listen to your message if you've done research that backs you up with indisputable, unbiased fact. Within ten years there wouldn't be any sign of micro evolution that we could see, but men have been sowing wild oats since the beginning of time and it's never really taken hold, even in places unaffected by judeo-christian morality. If men only began the practice in the US (for argument's sake) in the last 30 years there would be signs of it - if it gave them any sort of biological advantage.

The thing is that until now, it didn't. It's only now that the stigma surrounding having children with multiple partners is lessening. There used to be consequences keeping it from being a successful biological strategy, but now those consequences are dying out (or at the very least, changing).

As an anthropologist I find the question of whether micro evolution favors men who father loads of children with different women or not really quite intriguing.

I won't be breeding, so I am happy to be an impartial observer.

 

[Ruin]

So I read through your blog and there isn't one cited source that proves Incel is really a thing. The only Google results for "Incel" are your blog, your Encyclopedia Dramatica page, and a bunch of forums making fun of your blog.

Can you point me to one serious scientific study on Incel? I don't want a link to your shitty blog, I want a peer reviewed journal with either an in depth study or multiple sources cited from other journals.

Can you do that? If not Incel is make believe and you are a deeply mentally disturbed and sad little man.

 

[For The Internet]

Irrelevant.

I think littlebiscuits might be trying to establish markers of sociopathy. Relationships with pets and siblings hre relevant when going through the diagnostic criteria.

I could totally be wrong, sorry if I am, littlebiscuits!


For what it's worth I don't believe Holden is a sociopath.