Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Last edited by a moderator:
A good example of that is their belief that women can rape men when that is also anatomically impossible.
What if a woman anally fisted you? Would that be considered "rape," "something I wish someone would do to you," or "both"?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Randall Fragg
To the gulags with you, simpleton!

By the by Marjane, here's that woman that Coldgrip asked if you'd date her:

Wiki-background

He said he liked her face.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coldgrip
The problem is that while offical statistics back up what you say modern society worships sociopathy and psychopathy and calls all who are decent, moral and sensitive...
Yes, because attempting to fuck your mother, wanting to blackmail a girl into sex, and despising anyone in a relationship is decent, moral, and sensitive.
 
No. He said it is an analogy. I asked you what you specifically mean by an action of asking for drugs, you fucking idiot

Really? Do I have to draw it in crayon for you to understand? If you go to a drug dealer, as in narcotics, and ask for drugs to purchase it's a CRIME. The simple act of ASKING for drugs is fucking illegal. Just like asking your own mother to fuck is ILLEGAL. Have I broken it down into simple enough terms for you to wrap your five functioning brain cells around?
 
You know, if you would actually take your time, make your posts readable and not head straight for a page 400 thread within two days, it would greatly decelerate the entire discussion, be pleasant for everybody who's involved in this thread and would prevent you from making mistakes.

- in order to understand women's suffrage would you mind a shorter text? http://www.coalpha.org/Against-Women-s-Suffrage-td7575097.html#a7576321
I'll commentate on that later, but I already can see the fallacies.

- what happened toward the end of a roman republic was a steep decline in trust among men. this is connected to liberalism. roman women behaved until 1century ad but then become wicked and even installed some emperors.
So, what about the Gracchi and the unwillingness of the Roman nobility to implement the much needed social reforms which led to even more tensions in an already strained state? And how did the Roman women behave until 100 AD, when the Republic fell 49 BC (Cesar crossed the Rubicon, civil war broke lose)? Was Cesar a secret liberal or a woman?

most of the legal institutions that regulated women were abolished during the empire (tutela mulierum, for example).
Roman women have always been subjected to their fathers. The difference now was that they officially became part of their husband's family (before that, they remained part of their father's family even as married women).

- your comparison of sluts and workers is baffling.
The majority of "sluts" is actually employed and they provide for themselves next to rape apes in factories, shops, offices etc.

feral scum children
Like the ones you plan to set into this world?

and, yeah, there are some conservative women but they're rare and still like to slut it up
You're a charmer, you know that. So what is the perfect conservative woman?

they'll use the liberal state the first chance they get
By doing what? And what is a liberal state, as opposed to a conservative one?

- what is the point of this? i don't like senseless arguments on definitions. it's obvious what i mean by these words.
A fruitful discussion implies the usage of at least vaguely similar terms. You use "liberalism" for any development you don't like within a society and therefore use the term well beyond its actual meaning. If it is a synonym for "decadence" or "downfall", why not use them instead, but you keep implying that there is some kind of red thread going through all instances of societal downfall throughout history and you don't name what it is. Instead of that you use liberalism, a political concept which puts much emphasis on individuality, as a term to describe situations in which individuality as we know it simply wasn't existent as a concept.

- i understand that point. but it ultimately destroys a society
Again, this is yet to be proven.

NOT ALL ANCIENT GREEK PHILOSOPHERS WERE LIBERALS. the late ones were.
Names, please.

- seducers always existed but in small numbers and were despised by women. only the dumbest sluts mated with them. since a modern woman is by a definition dumb slut now they thrive. they're still not a vast majority but it's getting there.
Without using the words "liberalism", "feminism" or "progressivism" (just to prevent circular reasoning), what happened?

there are still some beta suckers who work.
God, that made me laugh.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back