Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
What to do about the woman problem
by Cornfed » Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:20 am

Even if evil Western ZOGs were overthrown and the few million traitors most responsible for their atrocities were executed, there would still be the issue of what to do about Western women. Since women do whatever the men in charge tell them they would instantly start being wives and mothers again when ordered to, and in any case they would have no choice but to come crawling back without the ZOG funding and supporting their dysfunctional lifestyles. However, they would still be horrible monsters and worthless sluts unable to perform their female role adequately. How would the new regime go about addressing this problem?

I can think of a couple of potential solutions. One would be to perform a kind of triage on the female population. Those of breeding age deemed to have good genetics would be ensconced in body fitting cages and kept permanently pregnant via artificial inseminationl like other breeding sows. Those not used for this purpose but who were physically attractive would be sent to state brothels where worthy men could use them for sexual release, and they might also be farmed out to cook and clean for men. The remainder of the Western female population would be shot. Once the generation of post-feminist females being cranked out by the breeders came on stream, they would be apportioned to men as wives and the remaining feminized females would be shot.

Another solution would be for Western women to be declared wild animals and dealt with in a similar manner to how certain animals are under the wild animal control statutes of various countries. Hence the owners of women would be required to brand, tether or tag them, or they would be considered "wild", in which case men would be free to claim them or hunt them or whatever. There would be a limit to how many women a man could own at any given time (excluding daughters), and husbands and fathers would have first claim. Women allowed to roam around unsupervised and cause trouble by irresponsible owners would be impounded and destroyed.

Any better ideas?
@Holden
Awesome plan, just one issue I have with it:
Women are people, not animals, property, or slaves.
Kind of ignoring that little detail, aren't you?
 
so? i never denied that this existed.

You've said that women are conditioned to enjoy rape due to a feminist society, but you've ignored all historical, cultural or biological evidence that destroys your claims. If rape is the result of a feminist movement, then its absence must also exist in this patriarchal ideal society you've been yammering about for two days.
 
ok. so post some? might have missed them?
You did miss them... and no. Go back through my much shorter posting history and fucking find them yourself, since you were too fucking ignorant to pay attention the first few times.

If you cannot or will not correct your own ignorance, then you are accepting the fact that you are and will remain ignorant. In this case, you are not only ignorant, but wrong. That, and I spent 20 minutes going back through your posts to find the ones I was referring to... for you to simply dismiss that effort and insist it didn't happen? Fucking shit man... you'll never learn a thing with that attitude. (and you wonder why I've been getting snarky? Because you've shown you are not serious in learning... you've got a brain, fucking use it)
 
You've said that women are conditioned to enjoy rape due to a feminist society, but you've ignored all historical, cultural or biological evidence that destroys your claims. If rape is the result of a feminist movement, then its absence must also exist in this patriarchal ideal society you've been yammering about for two days.
i never said that rape is absent in patriarchal societies. i said that only feminist societies eventually make all sex rape because the kids produced there are feral. you're too stupid to understand my points.
 
Most people don't see that as a good thing. Try another one please.
most people in a rapist society which hates decent people aren't a good argument for anything

They would have sent you and your entire family to a concentration camp. Really, the list goes on!
they didn't send me family to one. not a single member.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
they opposed democracy. they correctly saw the role of women. for example.
Could you be a little more specific? My history teachers were all female, so if we're to entertain your arguments, we must assume that my education was faulty (it was). Also, please define "correctly" for us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back