Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm officially changing his name to Truckbot 5000.
Truckasaurus.jpg
 
He probably doesn't want that money because it was earned and also helped pay for the feminazirapesphere.

He's really limiting his options, considering that at some point all money was earned by someone. You can't trade two chickens for a gram of meth. Well, maybe you can in Croatia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saney
no, you may have some point there, for the first time ever. i am biased to a degree.

but, jesus, you're not biased?
I don't often make claims so it doesn't matter if I am. It's called burden of proof and once you make a claim it falls on you. I also do analysis to lessen my bias because i'm into epistemology.
 
Because it shows how you behave around women, how you view women, and how you treat women. You don't deserve any level of trust when you've been spouting about sexual slavery and the death of anyone who believes in women having the right to vote.
namaz, i really don't know what to say to this. it's been debunked a month ago.

1. i said i stopped going on dates in 2013 and only went on one this year and that i developed these views fully this year. so, wrong.

2. i am not for sexual slavery, since women always feel attracted to the type of a man that's most successful with other women. in sane societies women are attracted to good, provider men, not sex slaves. they are sex slaves in feminism, where they're only attracted to thugs who can't comprehend a relationship.

I don't often make claims so it doesn't matter if I am. It's called burden of proof and once you make a claim it falls on you
well, dumbass, same stands for macie, right?
 
well, dumbass, same stands for macie, right?
I never said Macie didn't change the story, i'm just saying you no absolutely nothing about the situation except what she told you so your story is more unreliable. Do you have a fetish for Macie btw? Because you keep mentioning her and she's no longer in this thread.

I mean, yeah she made a claim, but I don't speak for her. I believe her because i've seen and heard similar cases which have an abundance of evidence to support them. Most American court records are open to the public and you can look this shit up if you're bored, and i'm normally bored.
 
I think I'm going to take a nap. If Truckbot doxxes me, wake me up by calling me and screaming "JULAAAAAAAAAY," okay?
You got it big guy. Any time we should show up to the party?
 
Horses aren't actually all that noble when you get right down to it (re: your post about how they take what they want and stuff). Some of them are aggressive or just malicious -- they will scrape off riders by deliberately walking under a low-hanging branch; step on a person's foot; bite a person trying to offer them an apple; or shoulder a caretaker aside on the way back into the stall. There are all kinds of bad behaviors they can develop that have to be trained out of them before they're even fit to give trail rides to kids, never mind racing or whatever. I picked this username for this website because it is the name of a mount my character rides in the MMO I play. A brief bit of Googling will tell you which one, although I thought you said something about being bored by most video games. If not, my mistake.

But like, you said that @Satan tried to infiltrate a community -- did you say LS.com? -- and that there was where he said he had killed an incel? Is there ANY possibility he may just have been trolling you guys? Like, if he infiltrated your group under false pretenses, and uses the username "Satan," both of those things point to him liking to mess with people. However, if you have solid documentation of other things about him (you said a picture that might be him, anything else?) that I should know, because I did kind of trust him before this, I will avoid him based on that. Since you can't PM, I could make a Skype account and let you communicate only by typing so I couldn't record your voice, if you have things you don't want appearing here. I mean, theoretically I could screenshot the conversation, but you can easily go through my posting history and see I have never done anything like that.

I continue to think you should be nicer to @Dynastia because she might just be different enough from the typical woman to give you an experience (even if it's only conversation) that you have never had before. I disagree with a lot of things she says about modern feminism, but I still respect her as a person -- for one thing, going around the globe teaching ESL must be pretty difficult, and she once said something about going on a vacation and hunting bear (again, I don't like sport hunting generally but that takes courage). I know that she is very direct. If she is interested in meeting a person, she will say so without a lot of extra words. If she is not, she won't even talk to them. You must have done something to interest her, for her to talk to you at all.
 
namaz, i really don't know what to say to this. it's been debunked a month ago.

1. i said i stopped going on dates in 2013 and only went on one this year and that i developed these views fully this year. so, wrong.

2. i am not for sexual slavery, since women always feel attracted to the type of a man that's most successful with other women. in sane societies women are attracted to good, provider men, not sex slaves. they are sex slaves in feminism, where they're only attracted to thugs who can't comprehend a relationship.
1. What do you mean, wrong? That has nothing to do with anything. Just because you say you went on a date doesn't change how much you hate women. First off, nobody believes you, and secondly even if you did, the way you talked about your 'fat schizo slut' that you had sex with makes it plain how you viewed your time with a woman.

2. Yes you are. We've been over this. Forced sexual bondage and death to women who disagree is sexual slavery.
 
1. What do you mean, wrong? That has nothing to do with anything. Just because you say you went on a date doesn't change how much you hate women. First off, nobody believes you, and secondly even if you did, the way you talked about your 'fat schizo slut' that you had sex with makes it plain how you viewed your time with a woman.

2. Yes you are. We've been over this. Forced sexual bondage and death to women who disagree is sexual slavery.
1. my point was that i haven't treated women badly to this day except online.
2. that's different. that is what happens to feminist women in sane societies. i will not do this nor would any group. i hope muslims will in the future.
 
1. my point was that i haven't treated women badly to this day except online.
2. that's different. that is what happens to feminist women in sane societies. i will not do this nor would any group. i hope muslims will in the future.


why would you treat them or any other person badly anywhere even online? that's bad karma and shows an idiot's lack of foresight
 
i claimed i never asked seriously, which is akin to not asking
Did you ask, yes/no?

Oh, and if you ask something out of desperation, it is by definition, serious. I thought you understood English quite well? (bullshit on that... the number of basic errors you keep on making is astronomical. Either you're using some translation program or you're fucking things up on purpose)
 
  • Feels
Reactions: RequiredName
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back