Skitzocow Mark Bernstein - Ryulong 2.0, Creepy Paranoid Stalker and Anti-Gamergate Loser with Delusions of Grandeur

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Mark now wants to find someone with a clean Wikipedia account who will act as his mouthpiece/meatpuppet and be a guide to Gamergate for the Arbitration Committee, since he's now topic banned and they have likely told him to fuck off.

N2HmY9H.png


uGIltvO.png


bR22bYg.png


View attachment 87812

0aAnwrQ.png



The 'Squiggleslash' Mark is talking to (his twitter is on private) is a gigantic sperg in his own right. He stopped editing with his Wikipedia account in 2008 (returning in 2015 to try to defend Mark Bernstein when Mark begged for help on Twitter) after getting in some edit war: "The dispute left me literally shaking with upset, afraid to visit the site lest the "You have new messages on your talk page" box appeared."

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Squiggleslash&diff=prev&oldid=653153838
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MarkBernstein&diff=prev&oldid=653156873
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Squiggleslash&diff=prev&oldid=653155028
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Squiggleslash&diff=prev&oldid=651853772

(Temporarily back. Aware I don't have the right social skillset for normal Wikipedia editorship though I make edits here and there from time to time when I can. Frightened by the degree to which Wikipedia politics can be gamed by sexist extremists, even more frightened by the refusal of the Wikipedia establishment to even recognize there's a problem, and their behavior towards those who point it out. Despite the notice below comments will be read until this notice is removed.)

It seems I have to clarify the above because some are now not getting past the first two words and assuming I never edit Wikipedia.

  • I used to heavily edit Wikipedia
  • I still edit Wikipedia from time to time, making minor edits, not logged in.
  • I got into a dispute before I effectively ended this account. The dispute left me literally shaking with upset, afraid to visit the site lest the "You have new messages on your talk page" box appeared. Combined with a review of my own edits, and realizing I was frequently finding myself reacting inappropriately to bad edits, I decided to walk away. I didn't have the stamina to cope with a sustained attack on me. I didn't have the temperament to deal with every poor edit with grace and charm.
  • Nonetheless I continued to use Wikipedia as a resource. For several years, I've made the occasional minor change to pages when I've seen an obvious mistake. And when I did make an edit, I generally then stepped away from the article involved. I can only think of one major change I did during that time, and I did my best to make the changes uncontroversial.
Irony is I'm probably a better contributor as an occasional AIP than as an accountable logged-in editor monitoring his watchlist looking for vandals and trolls.

I'm logged in right now to address the ramifications of Arbcom's actions regarding the Gamergate article. I'm not sure it's wise, but that's what I'm doing.

--Squiggleslash (talk) 15:38, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
I never thought there could be anyone spergier than Ryulong but this guy is proving me wrong. Fuck.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Hellfire
Mark now wants to find someone with a clean Wikipedia account who will act as his mouthpiece/meatpuppet and be a guide to Gamergate for the Arbitration Committee, since he's now topic banned and they have likely told him to fuck off.

Because Wikipedia and the ArbCom love it when you go to Twitter to try to raise an army for an edit war.
 
upload_2016-4-25_17-25-41.png


By which Mark means he saw someone who has edited the Gamergate controversy article trying to edit the Vaxxed page. Mark then decided to go join the edit wars there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vaxxed&action=history

upload_2016-4-25_17-29-11.png



One of the arbitrators has decided to ask if the "people associated with" line from the Gamergate topic ban could mean other Wikipedia editors, such as Mark's buddy Rob "Gamaliel" Fernandez, who has the arbitration case going against him,

upload_2016-4-25_17-32-48.png


Mark wants to know if this means he'd be topic banned from himself since he has used his media contacts to get quoted regarding Gamergate before.

upload_2016-4-25_17-35-29.png

upload_2016-4-25_17-35-50.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: chimpburgers
View attachment 88130

By which Mark means he saw someone who has edited the Gamergate controversy article trying to edit the Vaxxed page. Mark then decided to go join the edit wars there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vaxxed&action=history

View attachment 88131

This is batshit even by Reichstag's standards, not to mention he's so fucking petty he's gonna fuck with editors he hates on unrelated pages because they dared contradict his GamerGate rantings?

I don't remember even Ryulong being that damn childish.
 
This is batshit even by Reichstag's standards, not to mention he's so fucking petty he's gonna fuck with editors he hates on unrelated pages because they dared contradict his GamerGate rantings?

I don't remember even Ryulong being that damn childish.

At least this time there was actually someone involved with the Gamergate article. Mark claimed "Gamergaters" wer targeting the Margaret Sanger article when the only people involved with it at the time had never touched Gamergate or were IPs that had never touched Gamergate articles.
http://archive.is/Y2Lz6#selection-127.0-131.2

WikiFun

The American Right loves to pretend to be a victim. At Wikipedia, of course, the Gamergate right also loves to attack. At Wikipedia, one of their spokespeople suddenly does an about-face and endorses action against bullying -- especially my flagrantly patriarchal allusions to Shakespeare!

For example attempting to belittle another author's knowledge of Shakespeare as User:Mark Bernstein has done, is an exercise, and I would say an abuse, of power. Making accusations of criminal activity against other (blocked!) editors is an abuse of power.

So, I'm in the soup for mentioning Shakespeare and for mentioning to Gamergate’s rape and death threats. (I don’t know what incident got this fellow so hot and bothered, but I was probably alluding the Milton, anyway.)

Meanwhile, the Gamergaters have spread out to attack birth-control pioneer Margaret Sanger.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: chimpburgers
View attachment 89088

"Should I write about the problem in other media?"

Mark has removed this section from his talk page without anyone else commenting, so he probably got an email about it.

If I wasn't witnessing it with my own eyes, I'd never believe that someone banned from a topic on wikipedia wouldn't be able to resist talking about it anyway.

It is an encyclopedia, Mark. Surely there is another topic that interests you with a page that could use some help? Please reevaluate your life, and I say that with no malice.
 
upload_2016-5-3_13-37-54.png


Edit: He was sperging out even more today about Gamergate and his ideological allies in that topic area.

One of the anti-Gamergate editors that got topic banned during the arbitration is an adult baby fetishist called NorthBySouthBaranof aka Travis Mason-Bushman (He has refused to connect his past accounts but he was also FCYTravis and Polarscribe, the latter is his twitter handle). https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Travis_Mason-Bushman

Today a vveen made a comment on Travis' talk page parodying something Travis has on his user page and referencing Travis' "trouser-fouling." This made some of Travis' wikifriends really butthurt.

upload_2016-5-3_21-33-41.png


upload_2016-5-3_21-30-56.png


upload_2016-5-3_21-30-33.png

Meanwhile, Mark's friend Rob "Gamaliel" Fernandez still has that arbitration case going about him and he recently requested he be officially banned from taking administrative action under the Gamergate sanctions. This has led to a lot of speculation as to the motives and what not and today Mark posted this:

upload_2016-5-3_21-37-32.png


Mark then linked to his own post on his Twitter, asking if "Gamergate harassment successfully intimidate[d]" Fernandez.

upload_2016-5-3_21-40-50.png


upload_2016-5-3_21-39-30.png
 
Last edited:
Back