Manosphere Marky Mark - Not that Marky Mark!

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
murdoc said:
Saney said:
Even Nice Girls Are Sluts These Days

I forget who made this point at Mancoat, but it was an astute one nonetheless.  The poster in question posited that even nice girls are sluts.  Here's why...

First, let's take a look at your typical slut; this is your typical woman.  She becomes sexually active at 13-at the latest!  She has 4-6 short term relationships per year lasting 2-3 months each.  Between these relationships, she has a couple of one night stands worked in between.  By the time your typical woman is 25, she will have been sexually active for 12 years.  When we take her yearly partner count (4 relationships + 4 ONS per year)*12, we get 96 partners by the time she's 25; that's being conservative, because we only allowed for ONE ONS in between her short term relationships.  If we assume two ONS in between STRs, then we get (4 STRs + 8 ONS)*12=144; that's 144 dicks by the time she's reached 25!  That's slutting it up-er, being an empowered, liberated woman...

Now, let us look at what passes for a nice girl these days, shall we?  A nice girl doesn't lose her virginity until turning 16.  This nice girl has two boyfriends a year; she has two LTRs lasting about six months each per year.  Now, if we assume that said nice girl continues this pattern until 25, she'll have slept with 18 men by the time she reaches 25; by the time she's hit 25, our modern day nice girl will have had 18 penises in her birth canal.  Since 18<<96 or 144, that passes as a virtuous woman these days.

However, today's nice girl will have no doubt had a couple of one night stands along the way too; what, you think she didn't do the nasty with someone during her spring breaks?!  Come on!  At the very least, she will have had a couple of short term flings amongst her LTRs.  That brings the notch count of today's 'nice girl' (or what PASSES for a nice girl today, I should say) up to 20, minimum-all by the time she reaches 25.  BTW, the health text books of a generation ago said that any woman who'd had more than six or seven partners during her lifetime was promiscuous.  Therefore, even a 'nice girl' of today is a slut.  As Chris in Oregon would say, ICK!  Until next time...

MarkyMark
[citation needed]
http://markymarksthoughts.blogspot.com. ... -days.html
 
I think he meant Marky should provide a citation for all those "facts" about how many guys every woman apparently has sex with, and at what age.

Which he can't because it's all horse-shit.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Witlich
Yea, I don't know anyone who has had that much sex.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Witlich
Surtur said:
Yea, I don't know anyone who has had that much sex.
and even if someone did, where's the problem anyway? If they like it, why shouldn't people have a whole lot of sex? Why do some folks have to decry everything pleasant as immoral? Having a lot of sex, smoking weed, masturbating, eating a lot of great food - as soon as something is physically/emotionally pleasant, the self-appointed moral guardians get a hissy fit.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Witlich
Saney said:
Even Nice Girls Are Sluts These Days

I forget who made this point at Mancoat, but it was an astute one nonetheless.  The poster in question posited that even nice girls are sluts.  Here's why...

First, let's take a look at your typical slut; this is your typical woman.  She becomes sexually active at 13-at the latest!  She has 4-6 short term relationships per year lasting 2-3 months each.  Between these relationships, she has a couple of one night stands worked in between.  By the time your typical woman is 25, she will have been sexually active for 12 years.  When we take her yearly partner count (4 relationships + 4 ONS per year)*12, we get 96 partners by the time she's 25; that's being conservative, because we only allowed for ONE ONS in between her short term relationships.  If we assume two ONS in between STRs, then we get (4 STRs + 8 ONS)*12=144; that's 144 dicks by the time she's reached 25!  That's slutting it up-er, being an empowered, liberated woman...

Now, let us look at what passes for a nice girl these days, shall we?  A nice girl doesn't lose her virginity until turning 16.  This nice girl has two boyfriends a year; she has two LTRs lasting about six months each per year.  Now, if we assume that said nice girl continues this pattern until 25, she'll have slept with 18 men by the time she reaches 25; by the time she's hit 25, our modern day nice girl will have had 18 penises in her birth canal.  Since 18<<96 or 144, that passes as a virtuous woman these days.

However, today's nice girl will have no doubt had a couple of one night stands along the way too; what, you think she didn't do the nasty with someone during her spring breaks?!  Come on!  At the very least, she will have had a couple of short term flings amongst her LTRs.  That brings the notch count of today's 'nice girl' (or what PASSES for a nice girl today, I should say) up to 20, minimum-all by the time she reaches 25.  BTW, the health text books of a generation ago said that any woman who'd had more than six or seven partners during her lifetime was promiscuous.  Therefore, even a 'nice girl' of today is a slut.  As Chris in Oregon would say, ICK!  Until next time...

MarkyMark
...What.

I'm 24 and have had exactly zero dicks in my mouth, pussy, and ass. Marky Mark can't get laid because he thinks he knows women better than they know themselves, and that's a major turnoff.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Witlich
DykesDykesChina said:
Surtur said:
Yea, I don't know anyone who has had that much sex.
and even if someone did, where's the problem anyway? If they like it, why shouldn't people have a whole lot of sex? Why do some folks have to decry everything pleasant as immoral? Having a lot of sex, smoking weed, masturbating, eating a lot of great food - as soon as something is physically/emotionally pleasant, the self-appointed moral guardians get a hissy fit.

They shouldn't. A part of the problem with people like this is their ultra fundamentalist conservatism. My point being, most people are selective about their sexual partners.
 
DykesDykesChina said:
Having a lot of sex, smoking weed, masturbating, eating a lot of great food


Sounds like my ideal weekend.
 
Probably has been brought up before but one of his recent blog posts says he's single cause God deems it so, not because of "any smarts [he] may or may not possess."

3-wonka-restinghead.jpg


I'm just laughing in disbelief at the deadbeat dad letter, though. The last piece of advice, telling guys to internalize "You're pretty much going to be on your toes for the rest of your life, with no absolute guarantee for security, no matter where you are. But get over it."... Seriously, that is no way to live. Obviously I'm not saying a 9-5 job and lots of money are any securities either, but it's better than escaping to a country you're unfamiliar with and pretending you never had a family or children back home that you ought to be supporting.
 
Little-Lovely said:
Probably has been brought up before but one of his recent blog posts says he's single cause God deems it so, not because of "any smarts [he] may or may not possess."
So, he's part fschmidt, part Nick Bate? That's terrifying.
 
As a voluntary celibate, this shit is terrifying. I don't seek romance because I don't really feel inclined to. Been there, done that, ate some... chips too. Very fun, but whatever.

These people turn it into a whole victim thing. They blame women for not being attracted to their bloated, obese, ignorant selves.

Well, I'm obese and kinda ignorant as well. Women don't date me because I have little to offer, and I'm ok with that. So what is these assholes major malfunction?
 
Guys,

Chris in Oregon left this comment in response to an old post. Actually, it was three comments, thanks to Blogger's new limit on comment length; he wrote it in three parts. Anyway, it was so good that I'm posting it here...

---------------

Actually, I just read the entire article, and have a few thoughts, none of which are particularly earth-shattering. I just feel like pontificating, as the weather is nightmarishly hot this week, and there ain't no goin' outside for me.

This is so like women. They are so self-obsessed, they can't see down the road and ponder the consequences of their actions. They only care about their own personal gratification, not realizing that they might be the one's who are the losers in the long run by rejecting traditional family.

I hear the pain in this woman's voice, so to speak, but still, it's all "me, me, me, I want, I want, I want...."

Tough bananas, baby. Life ain't all roses, and we all make choices. Now, I've made choices in life, most good, some not so good. But, I live with the consequences of my choices, and don't whine about it. It is what it is.

A woman, on the other hand, is not prepared to accept responsibility for the decisions she has made. She wants someone to magically make it better. She foolishly waited to try and have kids until she was an OLD HAG, then wonders why it won't work.

Uh, duh!

Leave some eggs in your refrigerator for twenty years, and you'll understand the problem. Simple lesson: EGGS WILL ROT OVER TIME!

Here is a well-educated professional woman who doesn't understand this basic fact? I know women have been sold a bill of goods, but how dumb can you get?

Face it: Nature doesn't want CRUSTY OLD WOMEN having children! Basic biology, folks, and I'm no expert on biology. It's just common sense! Nature wants a woman around long enough to care for her off-spring, and she can't very well do that properly if she's spending her time having bypass surgery, cleaning her dentures, and sorting through her wrinkles!

Old women were not designed to breed!

Old women are supposed to be.....old women. Crabby old women. Ugly old women. Nasssssty old tobacco-chewin' women.

She has forgotten her place in life. She missed her opportunity, and now she regrets it. Suck it up, sister! A woman should be done spewing out babies by the time she is thirty, and no later. By forty, a woman is OLD! Look around you. Look at the forty-year-old women you see every day. See any of them you want to screw? Any of them? Didn't think so. (Blow-jobs aren't good either- their dentures might lock up on your weinie! Imagine THAT 911 call!)


Dude, you cracked me up with that one!!

Nature makes women BUTT UGLY fairly early in life to prevent them from breeding. Kind of hard to get pregnant if you're so gruesome no man in his right mind can get a boner over your appearance. But, women, in their arrogance, fail to realize that men are stimulated VISUALLY!

If you look like an old hag, then the penis just naturally will NOT stand to attention. You've got to have some sort of good looks to get our motors running, ladies, and if you look like a bag of wrinkly cellulite, then you had better face it- no one wants you! Contrary to the lie feminists have been telling you, fifty is NOT the new thirty! A fifty-year-old woman has less sex appeal than a sheep. (Ask anyone in Montana.)


What is it about Montana people & sheep, eh? That's like the second time you've said that...

I am constantly amazed at the post-forty women that have come on to me lately. Give me a break! Do they think I'm blind?

Ick!

There is truly nothing more preposterous, pathetic and downright sickening than an old woman who is trying to be seductive.

Ick, ick, ick!

There ought to be a law against such behavior!

I don't know. This is an issue my bachelor friends and I discuss quite occasionally. Old women trying to seduce us, that is. It gives us no end of amusement. I've got women in their fifties and sixties trying to flirt with me. Regularly. I can understand a woman in the transitional stage of thirty-five trying this behavior. She doesn't quite realize that her looks are all but gone, and is still trying the same old tactics. By forty, she should know better.

Look in the bloody mirror! If you can find one wide enough, that is. A woman of forty is not sexual in any sense of the word. She is useless for breeding, and her sex appeal is GONE! Why have women fallen for the lie that they remain sexual into their sixties and seventies? They are NOT! They are putrid, smelly shells of their former selves! Nothing more! By that age, a woman looks like the package her body once came in. All sagging, wrinkly and disgusting!

I'm in good shape physically, but I'm not twenty. I have no problem with this. I don't expect to have the strength, looks or virility I had when I was young. I'm realistic. I don't expect pretty eighteen-year-old girls to find me attractive, unless I win the lottery. (Then, of course, my looks will amazingly rebound overnight! Kinda' like a magic tonic, or something, those lottery tickets!)

It's amazing how money makes you look better to women, isn't it?

I've got this one broad, an antique dealer I know, who has the hots for me. About 60-65 years old. Nice enough lady, as far as that goes. I'm sure she was hot back in, I don't know....the Korean War? She just doesn't get it. I could rattle off dozens of these old crows that have tried to nail me. This is nothing new. I had these old broads bothering me when I was twenty! Seriously! If you just have to get laid, and you can close your eyes, and hold your breath (pew!), there is no easier lay than an old woman. They are so desperate. So pathetic. So easy.

So gross.

Christopher in Oregon


---------------

Chris, my man, thanks so much for leaving that funny, insightful comment. That was good, funny stuff! Until next time...

MarkyMark
ಠ_ಠ
Because there's no such thing as an attractive woman over thirty. Nope, not at all.
Dumbasses.
 
Loving the fact he had to inject himself into that letter too. Montana people and sheep, WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THAT
 
Why do they refuse to admit that they are not attractive mates, and then also reject that they may find a mate no matter how undesirable their own inferior form is?
 
Saney said:
Guys,

Chris in Oregon left this comment in response to an old post. Actually, it was three comments, thanks to Blogger's new limit on comment length; he wrote it in three parts. Anyway, it was so good that I'm posting it here...

---------------

Actually, I just read the entire article, and have a few thoughts, none of which are particularly earth-shattering. I just feel like pontificating, as the weather is nightmarishly hot this week, and there ain't no goin' outside for me.

This is so like women. They are so self-obsessed, they can't see down the road and ponder the consequences of their actions. They only care about their own personal gratification, not realizing that they might be the one's who are the losers in the long run by rejecting traditional family.

I hear the pain in this woman's voice, so to speak, but still, it's all "me, me, me, I want, I want, I want...."

Tough bananas, baby. Life ain't all roses, and we all make choices. Now, I've made choices in life, most good, some not so good. But, I live with the consequences of my choices, and don't whine about it. It is what it is.

A woman, on the other hand, is not prepared to accept responsibility for the decisions she has made. She wants someone to magically make it better. She foolishly waited to try and have kids until she was an OLD HAG, then wonders why it won't work.

Uh, duh!

Leave some eggs in your refrigerator for twenty years, and you'll understand the problem. Simple lesson: EGGS WILL ROT OVER TIME!

Here is a well-educated professional woman who doesn't understand this basic fact? I know women have been sold a bill of goods, but how dumb can you get?

Face it: Nature doesn't want CRUSTY OLD WOMEN having children! Basic biology, folks, and I'm no expert on biology. It's just common sense! Nature wants a woman around long enough to care for her off-spring, and she can't very well do that properly if she's spending her time having bypass surgery, cleaning her dentures, and sorting through her wrinkles!

Old women were not designed to breed!

Old women are supposed to be.....old women. Crabby old women. Ugly old women. Nasssssty old tobacco-chewin' women.

She has forgotten her place in life. She missed her opportunity, and now she regrets it. Suck it up, sister! A woman should be done spewing out babies by the time she is thirty, and no later. By forty, a woman is OLD! Look around you. Look at the forty-year-old women you see every day. See any of them you want to screw? Any of them? Didn't think so. (Blow-jobs aren't good either- their dentures might lock up on your weinie! Imagine THAT 911 call!)


Dude, you cracked me up with that one!!

Nature makes women BUTT UGLY fairly early in life to prevent them from breeding. Kind of hard to get pregnant if you're so gruesome no man in his right mind can get a boner over your appearance. But, women, in their arrogance, fail to realize that men are stimulated VISUALLY!

If you look like an old hag, then the penis just naturally will NOT stand to attention. You've got to have some sort of good looks to get our motors running, ladies, and if you look like a bag of wrinkly cellulite, then you had better face it- no one wants you! Contrary to the lie feminists have been telling you, fifty is NOT the new thirty! A fifty-year-old woman has less sex appeal than a sheep. (Ask anyone in Montana.)


What is it about Montana people & sheep, eh? That's like the second time you've said that...

I am constantly amazed at the post-forty women that have come on to me lately. Give me a break! Do they think I'm blind?

Ick!

There is truly nothing more preposterous, pathetic and downright sickening than an old woman who is trying to be seductive.

Ick, ick, ick!

There ought to be a law against such behavior!

I don't know. This is an issue my bachelor friends and I discuss quite occasionally. Old women trying to seduce us, that is. It gives us no end of amusement. I've got women in their fifties and sixties trying to flirt with me. Regularly. I can understand a woman in the transitional stage of thirty-five trying this behavior. She doesn't quite realize that her looks are all but gone, and is still trying the same old tactics. By forty, she should know better.

Look in the bloody mirror! If you can find one wide enough, that is. A woman of forty is not sexual in any sense of the word. She is useless for breeding, and her sex appeal is GONE! Why have women fallen for the lie that they remain sexual into their sixties and seventies? They are NOT! They are putrid, smelly shells of their former selves! Nothing more! By that age, a woman looks like the package her body once came in. All sagging, wrinkly and disgusting!

I'm in good shape physically, but I'm not twenty. I have no problem with this. I don't expect to have the strength, looks or virility I had when I was young. I'm realistic. I don't expect pretty eighteen-year-old girls to find me attractive, unless I win the lottery. (Then, of course, my looks will amazingly rebound overnight! Kinda' like a magic tonic, or something, those lottery tickets!)

It's amazing how money makes you look better to women, isn't it?

I've got this one broad, an antique dealer I know, who has the hots for me. About 60-65 years old. Nice enough lady, as far as that goes. I'm sure she was hot back in, I don't know....the Korean War? She just doesn't get it. I could rattle off dozens of these old crows that have tried to nail me. This is nothing new. I had these old broads bothering me when I was twenty! Seriously! If you just have to get laid, and you can close your eyes, and hold your breath (pew!), there is no easier lay than an old woman. They are so desperate. So pathetic. So easy.

So gross.

Christopher in Oregon


---------------

Chris, my man, thanks so much for leaving that funny, insightful comment. That was good, funny stuff! Until next time...

MarkyMark
ಠ_ಠ
Because there's no such thing as an attractive woman over thirty. Nope, not at all.
Dumbasses.

Does Chris in Oregon even want children? If he doesn't, then what the fuck is his problem?
 
trombonista said:
Saney said:
Guys,

Chris in Oregon left this comment in response to an old post. Actually, it was three comments, thanks to Blogger's new limit on comment length; he wrote it in three parts. Anyway, it was so good that I'm posting it here...

---------------

Actually, I just read the entire article, and have a few thoughts, none of which are particularly earth-shattering. I just feel like pontificating, as the weather is nightmarishly hot this week, and there ain't no goin' outside for me.

This is so like women. They are so self-obsessed, they can't see down the road and ponder the consequences of their actions. They only care about their own personal gratification, not realizing that they might be the one's who are the losers in the long run by rejecting traditional family.

I hear the pain in this woman's voice, so to speak, but still, it's all "me, me, me, I want, I want, I want...."

Tough bananas, baby. Life ain't all roses, and we all make choices. Now, I've made choices in life, most good, some not so good. But, I live with the consequences of my choices, and don't whine about it. It is what it is.

A woman, on the other hand, is not prepared to accept responsibility for the decisions she has made. She wants someone to magically make it better. She foolishly waited to try and have kids until she was an OLD HAG, then wonders why it won't work.

Uh, duh!

Leave some eggs in your refrigerator for twenty years, and you'll understand the problem. Simple lesson: EGGS WILL ROT OVER TIME!

Here is a well-educated professional woman who doesn't understand this basic fact? I know women have been sold a bill of goods, but how dumb can you get?

Face it: Nature doesn't want CRUSTY OLD WOMEN having children! Basic biology, folks, and I'm no expert on biology. It's just common sense! Nature wants a woman around long enough to care for her off-spring, and she can't very well do that properly if she's spending her time having bypass surgery, cleaning her dentures, and sorting through her wrinkles!

Old women were not designed to breed!

Old women are supposed to be.....old women. Crabby old women. Ugly old women. Nasssssty old tobacco-chewin' women.

She has forgotten her place in life. She missed her opportunity, and now she regrets it. Suck it up, sister! A woman should be done spewing out babies by the time she is thirty, and no later. By forty, a woman is OLD! Look around you. Look at the forty-year-old women you see every day. See any of them you want to screw? Any of them? Didn't think so. (Blow-jobs aren't good either- their dentures might lock up on your weinie! Imagine THAT 911 call!)


Dude, you cracked me up with that one!!

Nature makes women BUTT UGLY fairly early in life to prevent them from breeding. Kind of hard to get pregnant if you're so gruesome no man in his right mind can get a boner over your appearance. But, women, in their arrogance, fail to realize that men are stimulated VISUALLY!

If you look like an old hag, then the penis just naturally will NOT stand to attention. You've got to have some sort of good looks to get our motors running, ladies, and if you look like a bag of wrinkly cellulite, then you had better face it- no one wants you! Contrary to the lie feminists have been telling you, fifty is NOT the new thirty! A fifty-year-old woman has less sex appeal than a sheep. (Ask anyone in Montana.)


What is it about Montana people & sheep, eh? That's like the second time you've said that...

I am constantly amazed at the post-forty women that have come on to me lately. Give me a break! Do they think I'm blind?

Ick!

There is truly nothing more preposterous, pathetic and downright sickening than an old woman who is trying to be seductive.

Ick, ick, ick!

There ought to be a law against such behavior!

I don't know. This is an issue my bachelor friends and I discuss quite occasionally. Old women trying to seduce us, that is. It gives us no end of amusement. I've got women in their fifties and sixties trying to flirt with me. Regularly. I can understand a woman in the transitional stage of thirty-five trying this behavior. She doesn't quite realize that her looks are all but gone, and is still trying the same old tactics. By forty, she should know better.

Look in the bloody mirror! If you can find one wide enough, that is. A woman of forty is not sexual in any sense of the word. She is useless for breeding, and her sex appeal is GONE! Why have women fallen for the lie that they remain sexual into their sixties and seventies? They are NOT! They are putrid, smelly shells of their former selves! Nothing more! By that age, a woman looks like the package her body once came in. All sagging, wrinkly and disgusting!

I'm in good shape physically, but I'm not twenty. I have no problem with this. I don't expect to have the strength, looks or virility I had when I was young. I'm realistic. I don't expect pretty eighteen-year-old girls to find me attractive, unless I win the lottery. (Then, of course, my looks will amazingly rebound overnight! Kinda' like a magic tonic, or something, those lottery tickets!)

It's amazing how money makes you look better to women, isn't it?

I've got this one broad, an antique dealer I know, who has the hots for me. About 60-65 years old. Nice enough lady, as far as that goes. I'm sure she was hot back in, I don't know....the Korean War? She just doesn't get it. I could rattle off dozens of these old crows that have tried to nail me. This is nothing new. I had these old broads bothering me when I was twenty! Seriously! If you just have to get laid, and you can close your eyes, and hold your breath (pew!), there is no easier lay than an old woman. They are so desperate. So pathetic. So easy.

So gross.

Christopher in Oregon


---------------

Chris, my man, thanks so much for leaving that funny, insightful comment. That was good, funny stuff! Until next time...

MarkyMark
ಠ_ಠ
Because there's no such thing as an attractive woman over thirty. Nope, not at all.
Dumbasses.

Does Chris in Oregon even want children? If he doesn't, then what the fuck is his problem?
]
Because he is a colossal faggot.
 
I love how all women are deemed sluts by Marky Mark and other loveshys, and yet they all still can't get laid.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Witlich
Lol they get around that by calling them "selective sluts."
 
Back