- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
Artcow Matt Furie - greasy, delusional furry porn artist who really hates the meme he created, litigious ANTIFA
- Thread starter InLivingTuna
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2021
Nothing like being cucked out of your own meme and then your own side calling you racist Hitler because of it. Then again he probably shouldn't have been courting the retards to begin with.
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2021
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
NFTs are one of those things so goddamn retarded that when people get scammed with them, you wonder if they really deserve it. Lmao half a million bucks for a crude drawing of a frog's ass by a mewling autist.
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2020
It's not even a picture. It's just a receipt with a url appended
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2019
I just realized, NFT's are unironically the rare pepe market.
It's shit like this that makes me wonder if NFTs are secretly a government psyop to discredit crypto.
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2016
Furie really is a compete retard, isn't he?
He had his comic go viral in a way that artists can only dream of, and his response was to call everyone enjoying it nazis and bigots. He gets an opportunity to make HALF A MILLION DOLLARS off of his creation, and he spites the guy who paid him and will probably lose the money in the process. Does he actually like anyone who enjoys his art?
He had his comic go viral in a way that artists can only dream of, and his response was to call everyone enjoying it nazis and bigots. He gets an opportunity to make HALF A MILLION DOLLARS off of his creation, and he spites the guy who paid him and will probably lose the money in the process. Does he actually like anyone who enjoys his art?
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2019
The whole notion of NFT's is one of the biggest selling points for crytpo. In theory with NFTs you can easily show ownership of abstract assets like businesses, stocks, bonds, and even real estate; and cut out a lot of middle man bureaucratic bullshit.
The problem is now the whole concept of NFT's in the public consciousness is stupid pictures of apes that sell for thousands of dollars.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Lmao you and what army? You say you own an NFT, you can "prove" it, but I just bought the company that owned the url your dumbass picture of a drooling mongoloid frog was on and now I own it. In reality.
What are you going to do with your NFT? Go to NFT court? Oh wait, that doesn't exist?
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2019
It's bad enough I've got a boomers sensabilities when it comes to crypto but fuck me if I can understand what NFT is other than a retarded way to flex you had a lot of money at some point to own something not real?
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2021
Can you actually sue over pepe nft?? I thought nft were unregulated.
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2019
That's the point. You cut out a lot of legal overhead by having definitive proof of ownership. Its actually much more definitive than "the government says I own this" because it uses a record of the transaction that is not depend upon some third party that can arbitrarily revoke ownership at any given moment. Just ask the McDonald's corporation about their Russian stores, or people who get pulled over and arrested because it turns out that used car they bought was still legally owned by someone with an arrest warrant.
The drooling pictures of retarded mongoloids mainly use an p2p file sharing system, so that the urls can't just be taken down. I actually think this is a stupid way of going about it, since most of the stupid collectible NFTs could be made with SVG code. An SVG could either be stored directly on the blockchain itself, or intead embed code into the smart contract to generate the SVG.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Proving it to who? If I live on some property and some retard claiming they bought an NFT of it showed up, they'd be leaving without an intact skull.
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2019
The county decided they need to make room for a new high way, and your property doesn't exist anymore, have a nice day.
At the end of the day, government and law is just social convention + violence. Blockchain fills in the social convention by having a clear, transparent ledger of transactions that we can all reference. It works really well with "digital assets" since they exist purely as code anyway. It's why the Metaverse was being shilled as the main use case for blockchain.
It could work for physical assets like real estate, but as you pointed out there would need to be muscle to back it up. Now financial instruments that are largely abstract like stocks and bonds is a different story (though the FEC is going to have some harsh court fillings for you if you try that now). I'm just waiting for the first genius to get some small island country in the pacific to approve running a stock exchange that uses a public blockchain. I heard Osaka was looking into starting a stock exchange that uses blockchain technology, but I only expect that to be gimped to favor traditional financial interest.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Are you literally retarded? That's not how eminent domain works you goddamn idiot. Also counties are not in charge of highways.
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2019
My main point being government authorities can arbitrarily revoke your property. I know the thought of a world where the court system is not a bureaucratic nightmare, which gives you the ability to storm into any legal happening like you know what is going to happen and get everything wrong, while posting eagerly about how someone is going to get raped by a black man scares you.
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2020
cut of the middleman bullshit and give the authority to who? Unaccountable retards who can fork & bork at will?
There are just 3 legit uses of crypto. Purchasing illicit substances, money laundering and running crypto exchanges. And two of those already require you to have money in your hands.
Rest of your uses, proving ownership, decentralized social media, decentralized gaming ladidadida are vr goggles on a cow
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2018
If you “own” an NFT you are gay.
If you “own” an NFT and then brag about it or defend your ownership you are Double Secret Gay.
Internet argument resolved.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
Completely true, fuck this cuck