Matthew Craig Judge / Matthew Judge / DarkViperAU / DarkViper8888 / DarkViper88 - Former Atheist Debater, Copyright Abuser, Pseudo-Intellectual, Emotional Toddler, Compared Reaction Content to Rape, Considered Suicide Because of a Troll, Paid 3000$ to Remove A Video That Made Fun of him, Burns Bridges With People Over Stupid Bullshit.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
ibullybullies said:
DarkViperAU confirms he's a loser again. He can't get a date. Archived video
Click to expand...

Something tells me that being a paranoid hermit who does nothing but play video games is what's stopping him from getting dates, not that women are self-absorbed.

Shit, if he did anything that doesn't involve having a mental spiral over fucking Amongus and going on autistic crusades for internet points, he'd get a woman to pay attention to him. Or bathe. Wear something that isnt a sweaty tanktop.

For someone so obsessed with validation and appearances, you'd think he'd get that. Even the supreme gentleman, Elliot Rodger, understood that, and he was a sexless sociopath.

I don't even think Matthew is all that good at listening either. If anything remotely critical of him is spoken to his face, he weasels out of accountability by gish-galloping over semantics. And if that doesn't work, he throws a tantrum and runs to his hugbox.

Matt, if you're reading this, honesty is the bare minimum to get people, especially women, to like you.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Run Escape, Yandex Captcha Solver, Leemo and 3 others
ibullybullies said:
DarkViperAU confirms he's a loser again. He can't get a date. Archived video
Click to expand...
Insert the video into the post, it makes it easier to view in page, just some friendly advice. I know you're new so its not that big of deal, just know you can do that in the future. But anyways, everything about this screams projection. DarkFaggot thinks so highly of himself his number one problem with dating is people talking about themselves? Does this guy get no pussy? Every woman likes to talk about themselves unless they are genuinely fucked up and traumatized from real abuse, and feel insecure about telling other people about their life. Matt can't even land a brain damaged, traumatized or mentally stunted fangirl like Boogie was able too with Dez 2.0. If Boogie can manage it, why is it a herculean feat for Matt? Is he such an autistic, self righteous asshole that he'll blow up in the middle of a first date because the woman hes talking too has never played GTA or Among Us? The idea of Matt going on dates and sperging out is just so hilarious to me, I wish he'd start vlogging these experiences for our entertainment.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: PlasticOwls, Harm, Josephine Knezevic and 1 other person
ibullybullies said:
DarkViperAU confirms he's a loser again. He can't get a date. Archived video
Click to expand...
I'm very curious to know what kind of questions they answer with just one word lol probably something about fair use.
PlasticOwls said:
Shit, if he did anything that doesn't involve having a mental spiral over fucking Amongus and going on autistic crusades for internet points, he'd get a woman to pay attention to him. Or bathe. Wear something that isnt a sweaty tanktop.
Click to expand...
The tank top is the most horrifying thing. As I said before in this thread he needs to put a shirt on. Generally speaking women don't like guys in tank top.
Also yes, what can you talk about with him? He's always in front of a computer, doesn't leave the house and has no friends. After a while the conversation dies, obviously.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Iron Father, PlasticOwls, Nigga Bullshit and 1 other person
ibullybullies said:
DarkViperAU confirms he's a loser again. He can't get a date. Archived video
Click to expand...
1713548210128.png

:story:
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: SoyRageEngaged, PrincessHomura, moosemeese and 27 others
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Heavy Culter, Josephine Knezevic and Markass the Worst
Josephine Knezevic said:
The tank top is the most horrifying thing. As I said before in this thread he needs to put a shirt on. Generally speaking women don't like guys in tank top.
Also yes, what can you talk about with him? He's always in front of a computer, doesn't leave the house and has no friends. After a while the conversation dies, obviously.
Click to expand...
The tanktop sends the subconcious vibe you are violent and an asshole. There's a reason InfraredHaz stopped wearing his tanktop and started wearing suits/other attire, mellowed out and stopped screaming at people, it sends a bad message. Colloquially its known as a "wife beater" for its assosciation with abusers, it should never be your default look unless you are trying to signal to every woman "stay as far away from me as you can".
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Josephine Knezevic, no-exit, PlasticOwls and 3 others
PlasticOwls said:
What an insufferable faggot.

With anyone else, I'd chalk it up to be a sarcastic joke, but Matthew is petty enough to actually think like this.

View attachment 5920090
Click to expand...
Implying he’s going to have any family like someone would date a 30 year old Australian speedrunning sperg. He’d probably dump someone if he caught them laughing or enjoying a Karl Jobst video
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Toilet seats vendor, Run Escape, SnufflePuff and 5 others
Here is another fun fact in regards to Matthew's source on fair use ("Where's The Fair Use" by Jessica Vogele):


He says here that he had a problem with Chud using his entire work when he reacted to it.

1713602849255.png

But let's see what his source says:
1713603678648.png
If Chud's video was to be found transformative in a court of law (most likely it would be because he added his own commentary and doubled the length of Matthew's original video), that means the other factors of fair use wouldn't hold as much of significance.

1713603803926.png
Matthew's argument in the clip hinges on the third factor of fair use (Amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole). But his own source (Jessica Vogele) explains that if Chud's video was found transformative then the other factors wouldn't matter as much, when determining fair use.

1713604008665.png(A)
The copyright.gov fair use index also says that some courts have found that the use of an entire work can be considered fair use under certain circumstances.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: A Spooky Ghost, Markass the Worst, thhrang and 5 others
Musashi's Son said:
Here is another fun fact in regards to Matthew's source on fair use ("Where's The Fair Use" by Jessica Vogele):

View attachment 5923052
He says here that he had a problem with Chud using his entire work when he reacted to it.

View attachment 5923041

But let's see what his source says:
View attachment 5923059
If Chud's video was to be found transformative in a court of law (most likely it would be because he added his own commentary and doubled the length of Matthew's original video), that means the other factors of fair use wouldn't hold as much of significance.

View attachment 5923064
Matthew's argument in the clip hinges on the third factor of fair use (Amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole). But his own source (Jessica Vogele) explains that if Chud's video was found transformative then the other factors wouldn't matter as much, when determining fair use.

View attachment 5923070(A)
The copyright.gov fair use index also says that some courts have found that the use of an entire work can be considered fair use under certain circumstances.
Click to expand...
Erm, that's out of context or something. Watch Matt's videos, chud. :smug:
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Artificial Stupidity, Nigga Bullshit, Markass the Worst and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back