Orbiter Matthew Vickers / @MWV / ViciousVickers / Poor Yorick - Ex-coin merchant, bloodline gunted by Ethan Ralph. Fat cuckold who lost everything by trying to launch warfare against Ethan Ralph. Alleged rapist, proven cuckold, got mental damage from his wife's mean words. Cog paypig.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What caused Vickers' crazy eyes?

  • Tumour

    Votes: 49 3.4%
  • Stroke

    Votes: 201 13.9%
  • Gecko hybrid

    Votes: 396 27.4%
  • Dry eyes

    Votes: 33 2.3%
  • All of the above

    Votes: 766 53.0%

  • Total voters
    1,444
I'm so sorry. I didn't realize pointing out that Ralph driving the wrong way down a one way street drunk and stoned out of his mind with his child unsecured in the truck would cause you so much heartache. What's the wellbeing of an innocent child? It's ok, he's got a spare. I salute your devotion to the Gunt King (PBUH).

Good thing I didn't mention that until a few weeks ago Ralph was all in on his support of the pedos like Ali and Nick.
No shit. But this is the Vickers thread. There are plenty of threads to sperg about the hollerin hog.
 
It looks like Cog went over the documents in the case including the complaint and Ralph's shit filings and all there is to say is...



ITS_REAL.png

I took screenshots of the complaint itself the best I could. I think I got everything substantive. For most of it Cog basically just skimmed through it and said things like "this all seems normal", so it was kind of hard to screenshot everything. He also pronounced "Does" as in the word "does".

screenshot_1.png

Ralph's filings are shit and it looks like he filed a general denial rather than a special motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP. He needs a real lawyer. Didn't bother screenshotting all of that, but if you want to laugh at it you can go to Cog's stream.

The only mention I could find of the John Does is in Paragraph 3, as mentioned by Vickers in the chat.
commentt.png

Here's the best effort I could make to capture the complaint, it may be missing a bit because Cog scrolled through it so quickly.

screenshot_11.pngscreenshot2.pngscreenshot_3.pngscreenshot4.pngscreenshot5.pngscreenshot6.pngscreenshot7.png
 
Vickers is now suing 50 random internet people because he posts online in public places for all to see about how much of a dumpster fire his family is
This whole suing random people on twitter thing has got me thinking. If you have a twitter account that makes fun of trannies or whatever, and some tranny wanted to get you fired and SWAT your family, but you practice good infosec and they can't find your personal details... Couldn't they file a lolsuit and have twitter subpoena'd to reveal identifying information? Then drop the lolsuit and use the information to call up employers and SWAT your home address and family?
 
If Vickers really wanted to get the ball rolling on unmasking Does 1-50 he would post his filing in full so people could read the claims for themselves. It will be expensive and time consuming to attempt to ID Does 1-50 without any tips from the public. Though wonder if any of Does 1-50 refer to specific users of the Farms or just X users. Would be funny if one of the first piece of mail sent to the new PO box for Josh was a subpoena for user data.
For the sake of speculation, I would gladly take a tentative ID as Doe #GONNAFUCKTHATVICKERS for the sake of standing so I could just sit in a lawyer's conference room, gazing out a window as my lawyer smacks Vickers' attorney around, only nodding when the number is large enough to intrude on my daydream.
 
Cycle of Vickers' introduction to the Sektur from an oldfag like me.

1. Sympathy: He's a grieving father and his daughter was obviously manipulated into carrying the Guntling, he's just doing what he can to seek revenge.
1.5. Interest: This man might make Ethan Ralph seethe! Dopamine!
2. Confusion: Wait, he's kind of just like Ethan Ralph in many ways. Is he using this to seek attention? Why did he start a broadcast?
3. Conflict: This guy just started a podcast, he's funding a-log shows like the Kino Casino and Backwards Internet. However, he was ultimately wronged so I guess it's somewhat justified? I'll just ignore him.
4. Pity: This fat moron is getting his family swatted multiple times just to get a leg up against Ethan Ralph. He's making a public spectacle out of himself and doesn't listen to my public warnings. He's putting his own children in danger because of Internet bullshit.
5. Annoyance: Why does he keep on smugly inserting himself into events? He's not funny, his tactics are bullshit, and he's putting his family in danger.
6. That's it: Good will dragged to negative, fuck this fat faggot I want to see Ethan Ralph win.

There's only been around 3 other people to completely deplete my good will (one's a family member). Regardless, I still feel sorry for Xander and Faith (to some extent) because they are dragged out like this. Especially Xander, being put up as some kind of item to make Ethan Ralph mad. Heavens forbid Ethan Ralph take a picture but aye-oh-kay for the "alogs"!

Maybe he was the one to put Xander's photos up on /cow/, who knows?
 
The only mention I could find of the John Does is in Paragraph 3, as mentioned by Vickers in the chat.
I can never understand what is running through this fat dipshit's deep-fried pork-fat brain. The paperwork literally says 50 people. He is claiming 50 people contributed to his IIED. How is that not "suing the Internet"? How is that not exactly like Tomlinson? Because what he's trying to do is get a discovery in to try and dox these people. If any of these people are KF users I'm guns out on him.
 
I can never understand what is running through this fat dipshit's deep-fried pork-fat brain. The paperwork literally says 50 people. He is claiming 50 people contributed to his IIED. How is that not "suing the Internet"? How is that not exactly like Tomlinson? Because what he's trying to do is get a discovery in to try and dox these people. If any of these people are KF users I'm guns out on him.
I'll give the bitcoin bikers a heads up that their services may be required.
 
I'm so sick of this fat retard. Does he not realise everything he's (failing) doing to make Ethan Ralph seethe is making the situation worse for his innocent family?

He's not dumb, as in, he's not mentally dumb. He knows it. He's doing this because he's an egomaniac, or rather like a child that's denied a cookie (W against Ethan).

I can never understand what is running through this fat dipshit's deep-fried pork-fat brain. The paperwork literally says 50 people. He is claiming 50 people contributed to his IIED. How is that not "suing the Internet"? How is that not exactly like Tomlinson? Because what he's trying to do is get a discovery in to try and dox these people. If any of these people are KF users I'm guns out on him.
He's a literal, factual sperg.
His response will be something like this:
I WIN.jpginternet.jpg
 
I can never understand what is running through this fat dipshit's deep-fried pork-fat brain. The paperwork literally says 50 people. He is claiming 50 people contributed to his IIED. How is that not "suing the Internet"? How is that not exactly like Tomlinson? Because what he's trying to do is get a discovery in to try and dox these people. If any of these people are KF users I'm guns out on him.
Actually it's not like that because this time I'm personally offended and the other times other people were personally offended. If you give up trying to suss out a justification for their retarded actions it makes it a whole lot simpler and more accurate than any post hoc equivocation a dishonest person could conjure. It sucks because human beings who don't work off gecko tier reflexive instinct want a more complex or sympathetic motive but you know.
 
It looks like Cog went over the documents in the case including the complaint and Ralph's shit filings and all there is to say is...

View attachment 5287328

View attachment 5287334

I took screenshots of the complaint itself the best I could. I think I got everything substantive. For most of it Cog basically just skimmed through it and said things like "this all seems normal", so it was kind of hard to screenshot everything. He also pronounced "Does" as in the word "does".

View attachment 5287350

Ralph's filings are shit and it looks like he filed a general denial rather than a special motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP. He needs a real lawyer. Didn't bother screenshotting all of that, but if you want to laugh at it you can go to Cog's stream.

The only mention I could find of the John Does is in Paragraph 3, as mentioned by Vickers in the chat.
View attachment 5287365

Here's the best effort I could make to capture the complaint, it may be missing a bit because Cog scrolled through it so quickly.

View attachment 5287354View attachment 5287347View attachment 5287346View attachment 5287345View attachment 5287344View attachment 5287340View attachment 5287339
I'm sure those with legal experience will point out all of the incredibly amateurish and improper shit in Vicker's complaint but as just an average retarded shitposter, I am pretty sure you just sued the Internet, dude:

vickers.PNG

vickers1.PNG

vickers2.PNG

vickers3.PNG
 
What is with these fucking faggots being unable to post a pdf?
The intelligent thing would be to drop a PDF so it can be shared and discussed on open platforms. Vickers is not intelligent and hands it out only to ass suckers like Cog so they get 3 more viewers than normal by people screencapping the PDF to upload it here. That's it. That's literally the extent of why he operates like this.
 
He is claiming 50 people contributed to his IIED.
He doesn't even say what they actually did. Doe defendants are for when someone did something specific that you enumerate in the complaint, not just "50 random people did some shit I don't know what but I'm buck-broken and have fibro my algae now."

Even Fat Rick's complaint said at least some things his bullshit Doe defendants did, like "this guy called me fat" and "this guy threw a slice of bologna on my porch" and "this guy said my book sucked."
 
I can never understand what is running through this fat dipshit's deep-fried pork-fat brain. The paperwork literally says 50 people. He is claiming 50 people contributed to his IIED. How is that not "suing the Internet"? How is that not exactly like Tomlinson? Because what he's trying to do is get a discovery in to try and dox these people. If any of these people are KF users I'm guns out on him.
Not sure, but I expect the cope will be something like that "suing the Internet" would be suing each and every person who has ever used the Internet but he's only suing these 50 specific people who have done him harm.

We will see on his stupid show what his cope is and when or whether he decides to clarify who the hell the people he claims have harmed him are.

I am not exactly sure what he is accusing the 50 Does of doing. He claims that "each of the defendants DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, are negligently or otherwise legally responsible in some manner for the events referred to in this complaint". But then all as far as I can tell all of the factual claims involve Defendant Ralph, Defendant Ralph, Defendant Ralph.

How is anyone other than Ralph responsible for what Ralph says on Ralph's show or what Ralph says on Ralph's Twitter account?

He doesn't even say what they actually did. Doe defendants are for when someone did something specific that you enumerate in the complaint, not just "50 random people did some shit I don't know what but I'm buck-broken and have fibro my algae now."

Even Fat Rick's complaint said at least some things his bullshit Doe defendants did, like "this guy called me fat" and "this guy threw a slice of bologna on my porch" and "this guy said my book sucked."
Yes, going back through the early parts of the Patrick thread, it appears Tomlinson actually identified what each John Doe was alleged to have done to harm him.

Which means this lolsuit is actually worse than Patrick's by some margin so far.

There's also shit like this in it:

paragraph4.png

Is the idea that Ethan Ralph has been running a business empire with 50 employees? I literally don't get this. Saying this is like Tomlinson his an insult to Tomlinson at this point. I'm kind of stunned.

What is with these fucking faggots being unable to post a pdf?
If a PDF got dropped they wouldn't be able to milk it for attention.
 
Okay, I think I understand what's going on with this, though it would be impossible to figure this out from the filing alone. Someone incidentally tagged me into a thread and I read the timeline of a user named Xanniberries who is apparently the #1 MWV a-log. He has this video on his timeline:



So what I think MWV (retard) is trying to do is sue Xanniberries specifically, but he doesn't understand you don't name each sock account as a new John Doe.
 
Back