May 1 2023 - Chris sighting at Walmart

[Phalanges Mycologist]

Outside of weens the problems seem to arise when he gets too comfortable and starts loitering or taking other liberties.

Pretty much, once he gets habituated to a place and he feels at home he starts taking the piss and stuff just spirals down from there. You have to have someone constantly remind him of the social norms of any community he finds himself involved in or he will fuck up whatever good will they had towards him, resulting in a ban.

That's part of the reason I think he stopped going to that Gay social club a few years back he was wearing his welcome thin and he was pulled to one side by someone he liked or knew and they told him to knock it off and because he was still no closer to getting China he just stopped going because other than women there was little else there to keep his intrest (poneys, lego, toys, etc).

 

[FinnSven]

The SOR is intended for the worst of the worst. People who are actually dangerous to the public at large (especially children). Yes, people who shouldn’t be on it do get on it (ie an eighteen year old dating a sixteen year old with litigious parents), but Chris doesn’t qualify.

“He raped his elderly mother!” So keep him away from his elderly mother.
“He’s a danger to other little old ladies!” Only under very specific circumstances. We don’t go precrime with this if we don’t have to.
“He’s a danger to children!” We have zero evidence of this.
“There’s a picture of him sitting and chatting with a little girl!” So?

To the best of my knowledge, Sex offender register criteria varies from administration to administration.
Here, any form of sex offender register doesn’t exist due to privacy rules and a universal right to roam, so nonces simply can’t be banned from going near schools.
In the UK, men ended up on it for pissing in the woods, but being spotted shaking the drips off by a little girl, and in one case a 12 year old boy was placed on it for fighting with other kids.
He was considered a “danger to children”.

Chris, as pointed out by Ophelia, is only a strongly suspected sexual threat to his mother.

Even if he has a long and documented history of inappropriate sexual propositions and expressing desperation for intercourse, he doesn’t seem to have actually attacked or forced himself on women, girls or children.

The kissing people without permission at the conventions might have counted, but he is a proven retard. They can be a bit grabby and kissy.

He has shown himself to be capable of armed violence.

So the fact that he simply hasn’t tried to rape a girl by threat of pepper spray probably demonstrates to the authorities that he isn’t about to start.

So no, he probably won’t end up on the SOR, unless he takes to flashing.

 

[Little Pigboy]

I always assumed Chris was too retarded to do anything normal like shopping.

Pissing money away on a whim is a cornerstone of what makes Chris Chris. The four tenants of Chrisliness are as thus.... Horny. Pissing away money. Sonichu. Autism. Each one is a reflection in some way with the other three. For example... Chris is horny. Chris will piss away money on wooing potential love interests (Megan, Ivy, DoopieDoOver- whoever he has his sights on. He'll try to buy them.), Chris will use Sonichu to try and impress them, or he'll try to get sympathy pussy for being an autistic blubber golem.

Chris pissing away money? It was either to get pussy in some way, on Sonichu crap, or on something he was hyper fixated on at the time because he's autistic. Sonichu? He'll blow money on anything sonic related so he can repaint it, will beg for thousands of dollars to go to conventions to remind people he made up sonichu, or go to jail for pepper spraying someone to defend sonichu's honor... he will live out his sexual fantasies with his sonichu furry race... or use it to try and impress some dumbass like Fiona out of her panties and somehow along the line Sonichu made his autism worse. Now the autism part? Chris will blow money on stupid shit, flirt with anything that moves and spout Sonichu's glory from the rooftops because he's a stupid autistic fuckwad. Autism, money to piss and burn, china and Sonichu... that's about all there is to him when you boil it down.

 

[PlasticOwls]

The four tenants of Chrisliness are as thus.... Horny. Pissing away money. Sonichu. Autism. Each one is a reflection in some way with the other three. For example... Chris is horny.

It's usually reserved for sex offenders, but I think a good compromise is chemically castrating Chris.

He is getting on in years, but upon reflection, most of his poor decisions are hormonal. Just snipping the testes might get him docile and flaccid enough to exist without chemming him into a zombie.

 

[Aegeus]

That's part of the reason I think he stopped going to that Gay social club a few years back he was wearing his welcome thin and he was pulled to one side by someone he liked or knew and they told him to knock it off and because he was still no closer to getting China he just stopped going

Yes. Chris only went there to sexually harass lesbians because he's a "male lesbian," you see, so in his mind, real lesbians would love having his shit-covered, morbidly obese hands all over them while they tried to relax. I'm sure the owners finally told him to stop molesting the women because he was scaring off paying customers. Chris never returned because the molestation of women was the only reason he ever went there.

The four tenants of Chrisliness are as thus.... Horny. Pissing away money. Sonichu. Autism

Indubitably. He's always been an insanely horny disgusting POS, and his welfare leech money has allowed him to impose himself on women and shop owners. At the same time, he throws around the unearned and undeserved money he stole from hardworking US citizens with wild abandon (he's a lot like Elon Musk in that respect).

 

[Shanndog]

So you saw tards being mistreated, said "i can't watch this happen anymore" then left the tards alone with them?

I was gonna epic troll this fat gay gorilla retard epic style on June First but unfortunately I have a job and a woman so I couldn't attend the tard exhibition. Maybe I can get tickets for the July tour?

Autism is not a resource you spend at will. It spends itself.

no, i reported the issues, but i did not stay after seeing so much of this crap swept under the rug, that is why i left, is so often things would not get fixed, especially if said abuser was in the circle-jerk club with management and directors, so much ass kissing and wrong doing getting brushed aside. you have no clue my friend. smh

 

[BeatboxBill]

Before I go ahead and keep typing: This is only for information and research purposes, my actions were not we.en or trolled inspired and I strongly advise that people don't call Gateway Homes.

I called the group home (only to put end to the search and just for verification purposes - I didn't call to be a nuisance) and they said there is no Christine Weston Chandler living there so Chris may be in a different group home in Chesterfield County or he could be living on his own there, but has a caregiver visit him daily so that is one thing that can be ruled out.

I obviously gave a false name to protect myself, but I didn't say anything stupid like "Oh let Chrissy know that I miss him and that KF are thinking of him" or "JULAY!", I just simply asked if he was there and ended the call with a polite goodbye right after they confirmed everything and left it at that.

But yeah, if any other observers are still curious about Chris's whereabouts, Chris is definitely not living at Gateway Homes.

All the idiots who are ringing there to stalk Chris or scream "JULAY" though are wasting their time and won't get anything. He's probably finally learning his lesson and going off-grid. These photos and videos are pretty much lucky shots at this point.

 

[Protistology]

But yeah, if any other observers are still curious about Chris's whereabouts, Chris is definitely not living at Gateway Homes.

You do know people can lie right?

If the van lady wasn't from a home, maybe she was an uber pickup?

 

[JackoVerde]

speaking of chris sighting
the true and awhnest chris chan acknowledged ian brandon andersons sighting today.

https://twitter.com/SingStarWinner/with_replies

 

[Hopkinsville Goblin]

It's usually reserved for sex offenders, but I think a good compromise is chemically castrating Chris.

He is getting on in years, but upon reflection, most of his poor decisions are hormonal. Just snipping the testes might get him docile and flaccid enough to exist without chemming him into a zombie.

Chemical castration would likely involve giving Chris Depo-Provera, which is already used by transsexuals. I don't think Chris fits any legal requirement for chemical castration.

"Snipping the testes" would be a surgical castration, assuming you're talking about removing them. Snipping the vas deferens would just be a vasectomy and that prevents sperm from becoming a component of semen but it does not stop sex drive or testosterone production.

I called the group home (only to put end to the search and just for verification purposes - I didn't call to be a nuisance) and they said there is no Christine Weston Chandler living there so Chris may be in a different group home in Chesterfield County or he could be living on his own there, but has a caregiver visit him daily so that is one thing that can be ruled out.

The professional thing for a worker to say would probably be something like "I cannot confirm or deny that this person has ever been a patient at our facility" because that would avoid a HIPAA violation. When calling you might get someone who didn't do that of course.

 

[AnOminous]

The professional thing for a worker to say would probably be something like "I cannot confirm or deny that this person has ever been a patient at our facility" because that would avoid a HIPAA violation. When calling you might get someone who didn't do that of course.

He isn't a patient of the group housing facility unless they're the ones also providing medical attention to him. HIPAA covers:

It might or might be considered a "nursing home" or at least a similar category, but unless so, or if it directly provides medical care, the mere fact of his residency there wouldn't be covered.

That said, it would be best practices never to disclose such information unless legally required, and I am somewhat skeptical of the person claiming they said this. Also that said, everyone should refrain from being an autist and calling a group home even if he is there.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

He isn't a patient of the group housing facility unless they're the ones also providing medical attention to him. HIPAA covers:
View attachment 5124790
It might or might be considered a "nursing home" or at least a similar category, but unless so, or if it directly provides medical care, the mere fact of his residency there wouldn't be covered.

That said, it would be best practices never to disclose such information unless legally required, and I am somewhat skeptical of the person claiming they said this. Also that said, everyone should refrain from being an autist and calling a group home even if he is there.

That's not really the analysis. First, a HIPAA-defined Covered Entity can give out what is termed directory information (someone is there, where they are located (e.g., which hospital ward), general condition, etc.) to someone who inquires about the person by name. They are not, of course, required to do so.

Whether a group home/ residential facility/ assisted living facility/ semi-independent living facility, etc., qualifies as a Covered Entity turns first on whether it transmits health info electronically/has a third party do that, not whether the facility itself provides medical services in-house in the strict sense. There are additional things to consider (consent/authorization, who's asking, court order, and on), but the practical reality is that most half-decent places anywhere near the space typically have at least internal policies and practices about telling randoms about those under their care/in residence whether or not required by law.

It's fairly dated, but the first item in this newsletter discusses whether nursing homes (one example of a type of facility that might or might not be a covered entity, hybrid, or neither) are subject to HIPAA.

https://www.dwt.com/-/media/files/news/2013/01/quoted-in-hipaa-can-pose-unique-challenges-for-ass/files/boh-jan-2013/fileattachment/boh-jan-2013.pdf?rev=4b1fd2a2a0fb4aaca3897bc2a43b1932

 

[AnOminous]

That's not really the analysis. First, a HIPAA-defined Covered Entity can give out what is termed directory information (someone is there, where they are located (e.g., which hospital ward), general condition, etc.) to someone who inquires about the person by name. They are not, of course, required to do so.

That depends on the kind of facility. I've never seen a psychiatric facility or rehab give out such information, whether or not HIPAA directly prohibits it. The very fact of being in a psychiatric facility or some home for the disabled is disclosing that they have a mental condition of some sort.

Not sure whether it's HIPAA or just policy, but I'll note the Virginia inmate tracking system did not list him when he was in the mental facility, even though he was certainly not free to go.

It's fairly dated, but the first item in this newsletter discusses whether nursing homes (one example of a type of facility that might or might not be a covered entity, hybrid, or neither) are subject to HIPAA.

I'm also not sure in the least whether it could constitute a nursing home at all, or is even covered by HIPAA. Also HIPAA isn't even the only regulatory scheme. There are probably state agencies covering this as well, never mind common law torts like something related to breach of confidentiality.

This very well may just be a housing provider, with someone else or the state or privately retained medical personnel actually providing any HIPAA-covered services. In that case, they'd be no more bound by HIPAA than low-rent housing.

Not disagreeing that even if they are HIPAA-covered, they could (probably) be allowed to disclose information like his mere presence or non-presence (at least without violating HIPAA specifically), just that I am skeptical that they actually would do that.

 

[Yaks]

If a group home is receiving Chris why would they tell anyone he was there? HIPAA or not, someone had to have briefed them before intake the infamy behind him and what that could mean for them if they let than information slip.

DON'T TELL ANYONE!

 

[UselessRubberKeyboard]

I dunno. It's kinda worrying to me that they're allowing him to do the Sonichu and 'I'm a female' shit. I guess the latter is generally hands off in today's woke world, but the whole Sonichu merge shit is part of the reason Chris went (even more) batshit insane to begin with. I hope they're giving him hefty counselling to cure Chris of his one-man Sonichu religious beliefs. Seems a bit slack to be trying to rehabilitate someone then allow them the things that made them crazy to begin with. Stuff like believing cartoons are real should be a basic 'stop that stupid belief' treatment, no? I'm not a psychiatrist, so no clue.

Shit, this is some sort of academic paper isn't it? Can Chris be sane with Sonichu in his life?

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

I'm also not sure in the least whether it could constitute a nursing home at all, or is even covered by HIPAA.

I wasn't suggesting it is/would be. It was offered for the analysis, however superficial.

There are probably state agencies covering this as well,

Of course. Some states get into more detail about or apply privacy rules to entities that might be borderline for strict readings of "covered entities" (such as halfway houses, transitional or supportive housing, etc., that has some involvement in or knowledge of residents' medical issues, regardless of whether they transmit health info electronically).

never mind common law torts like something related to breach of confidentiality.

Absent regulatory schemes or self-imposed provider codes of ethics, or some other "special" relationship, that doesn't exist. You have to have a duty of confidentiality before you can breach it.

I am skeptical that they actually would do that.

As am I, as I said (the part about "practical reality"). The HIPAA confusion and obsession around these threads is basically peripheral, academic (in the theoretical sense, not actual academia) discussion: HIPAA's been around a long time, and it's basically an irrelevant discussion, because any half-decent place, whether strictly subject to HIPAA or not, basically conducts business day-to-day as if it were.

 

[AnOminous]

Seems a bit slack to be trying to rehabilitate someone then allow them the things that made them crazy to begin with.

It seems a bit slack to allow this literal motherfucker still under pending charges to be walking around free. Seems off if he actually is in a group home of some sort. You would think he would be under more intense probation.

He'll probably get up to his old high-jinks if there's nothing to stop him.

You have to have a duty of confidentiality before you can breach it.

Common law principles still exist unless explicitly abrogated by statute (rather than abrogating most statutes addressing what was previously common law instead codify them with or without modifications). If the behavior of the parties created a presumption of confidentiality, it can be breached. Or of course such a duty could be established by any papers exchanged between or agreed on by the parties.

HIPAA has not, so far as I know, preempted state law duties of confidentiality between doctor (or medical personnel in general) and patient whether or not HIPAA covers them.

HIPAA was enacted to ensure a base minimum, not a ceiling, and is fairly limited in its scope.

It's pretty speculative anyway because we really don't even know where Chris is, it's just a guess that it's that place. All we know for sure is he's allowed to go out on his own without a tard wrangler and is going on shopping sprees.

 

[Duke Nukem]

I don't like the idea of chris getting his tugboat checks back, mainly because I don't like him having nice things. But I'm almost certain he'll blow it and lose out on his ssi somehow. Maybe he'll try and "soul bond" with some disabled girl in the group home.

But she did egg Chris on when her original plan to hook Chris up with that autistic chick went sideways...

If possible, visiting a different Walmart every time would also help mitigate the risk of Chris being weened. Of course this'll only work for so long before weens start staking out every single Walmart within a 50 mile radius of Chris' group home, but it'd buy Chris and his wranglers some time.

Yes. Plebbitors are nearly always 100% wrong about all the stuff they spout and the hivemind updoots makes it so the wrong stuff is always updooted while if you try to correct them you get downvoted. Fun fact: Plebbit is literally owned by the communist Chinese government.

Chris has 23,400 USD from his welfare leech SSDI that piled up while he was in jail. He now has access to all that money. If anything, he's been rewarded for raping his mom.

That's unlikely. He's most likely on the "autism disorder deferred disposition" right now, which means if he keeps his nose clean for a few months, everything will disappear with no conviction, no SO reg, etc.

It's insane that China is better at this capitalism thing than the US. Reddit's interface is garbage anyway.

I seriously can't believe Chris is going to get away with it once again. Unless it's like with Nick Bate where he thought he wasn't going to go to jail because "the investigation had been concluded."

He did normal things all the time without incident. We don’t report on all the times he didn’t act like a blithering idiot. It’s been speculated that as Barb got even lazier, Chris did most of the essentials shopping.


He glared at them with a pout and imagined they disappeared. Then he left, leaving the display untouched. When he talks about using his goddess powers, he’s telling you a story.

I find it amusing he actually got thrown out for writing HEXBox on a display, I wonder how mad he'd be if someone wrote POO on the PS5 display?

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

It seems a bit slack to allow this literal motherfucker still under pending charges to be walking around free. Seems off if he actually is in a group home of some sort. You would think he would be under more intense probation.

He'll probably get up to his old high-jinks if there's nothing to stop him.

Common law principles still exist unless explicitly abrogated by statute (rather than abrogating most statutes addressing what was previously common law instead codify them with or without modifications). If the behavior of the parties created a presumption of confidentiality, it can be breached. Or of course such a duty could be established by any papers exchanged between or agreed on by the parties.

HIPAA has not, so far as I know, preempted state law duties of confidentiality between doctor (or medical personnel in general) and patient whether or not HIPAA covers them.

HIPAA was enacted to ensure a base minimum, not a ceiling, and is fairly limited in its scope.

It's pretty speculative anyway because we really don't even know where Chris is, it's just a guess that it's that place. All we know for sure is he's allowed to go out on his own without a tard wrangler and is going on shopping sprees.

Honey, I don't need you to explain common law to me. That's why I said only that there has to be a duty before there can be a breach; I did not say that HIPAA defines the totality of doctor-patient obligations. However, it happens that common law in the US does not ipso recognize doctor-patient privilege; in the US, it's a function of Federal and state statutes, from a legal perspective. Ethical analysis may be different.

 

[AnOminous]

Ethical analysis may be different.

Not necessarily explaining to you but to anyone else reading it, and I didn't mean to imply that you needed it (or that anyone did really). The tl;dr though is my (or anyone's) legal analysis is somewhat superfluous since I am very doubtful a group home or subsidized housing would be forbidden from disclosing the mere presence of someone there. I am just even more doubtful that they would actually do so.

I just didn't want to rule out that somehow, the parties in any situation like that could either by contract or by their behavior somehow create an express or implied duty of confidentiality and got a little out of hand elaborating on it considering it's probably irrelevant anyway.