🐱 Meet the Academics Studying the Science of Furries

CatParty

“We’ve started a discipline,” says Dr. Sharon E. Roberts, Associate Professor at Renison University College at the University of Waterloo, cofounder of the International Anthropomorphic Research Project, and one of the world’s leading academic experts on the furry fandom.


The IARP, also known more colloquially as FurScience, is comprised of psychologists, sociologists, social workers, and more around the globe; they’re hard at work gathering solid science behind a culture that has always been misunderstood — though thanks to their work, not as badly as it once was. With dozens of journal publications under their belt and over a decade of data at the ready, the field of Furry Studies is one of the most delightful, and surprisingly robust, areas of academia.


“We’ll tackle different topics in large part as furries bring them to us,” Dr. Roberts says. By training, she’s an identity researcher who studies how people transition into adulthood. The coping strategies developed over decades by the funny animal community (as it was known before the term "furry" took hold) are a source of deep fascination, because the data show that furries have particular insight when it comes to that transition.

“What we know from decades of research is that having a core sense of identity is essential to good health,” Roberts says. “You have this community that … has been largely abused and misunderstood by the general public, and they’re thriving. ... Furries are really doing well.”


The network of academics has conducted research into education (furries tend to be well-educated), species identification (holding “their” species in a positive light may be a means of bolstering self-esteem), mental health (furries report a more stable sense of identity than non-furries), sexual activity (furries rate sex as a relatively low priority in the fandom), and more.


To conduct these studies, they’ve developed a massive database of about a thousand people in the fandom who are willing to be contacted for research purposes. “We wanted to build a space for international collaboration,” Roberts says. Having established a trusted relationship with community leaders, the IARP is now able to collaborate with other academics looking for ways to access this sometimes-skittish community.



And although the pandemic has slowed some projects, such as a planned trip to conventions abroad to study different cultural approaches to the fandom, IARP researchers have several projects underway at the moment. Among them: an investigation into how the community impacts people with autism.

“Fursuits may or may not be advantageous” for people with autism, Roberts says. “Autistic people who are furries are not more likely to have fursuits … but they do have some interesting unique benefits,” for example calming sensations of compression and weight, less risk of overstimulation while wearing a foam head, less eye contact, and more exaggerated and explicit nonverbal communication.


Another project is an investigation into transgender wellbeing.

“We noticed that there are disproportionate amounts of people who identify as trans in the fandom,” Roberts says, and that they appear to be doing particularly well. “There seems to be a resistance that’s built into being part of the community ... That’s what’s fascinating, when you find vulnerable groups of people who are thriving.”

There was a time, many years ago, when furries were the much-maligned target of mockery online, and an occasional target of derision in mass media. Those days seem to be behind us, Roberts says, with long-term data showing a steady growth in acceptance. It’s too early to say why exactly the public perception has changed, but the phenomenon seems to align with the resilience of the community. The research seems to suggest three primary factors that contribute to furries' great strength: community, artwork, and friendship.

“It’s been the privilege of my life to engage with this community,” Roberts says. “Furries are misunderstood, but when you cut through it with science you find all kinds of great things.”
 
I remember these loons. They're just furries who have figured out a way to get free tickets to visit any convention they want by fooling academics into paying for them.
All of their collected "data" is gathered from volunteers in the early mornings, and then the "researchers" vanish into the con the rest of the day.

Of course people who voluntarily give info at 6 am will be the high-energy optimists that prefer working on projects instead of having creepy sex.

The ones they should be interviewing are the ones that stay after dark...
 
Last edited:
You can probably perfectly correlate those furries to hours of the amount of cartoon media consumed between the ages of 4-12. The more countless hours kids watch cartoons, and don’t interact with other humans, the more this plague will spread. Also, I’m sure 50% of furries got some sort of ASD diagnosis at some point.

Or maybe the kids who watched a lot of cartoons were socially maladjusted to begin with.

Correlation =/= causation
 
  • Feels
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
Or maybe the kids who watched a lot of cartoons were socially maladjusted to begin with.

Correlation =/= causation
No but the first ever mention of what we came to call furries was a very small meet-up in the 1970’s, which lines up perfectly with the first generation of adults who were raised watching cartoons on TV. The only reason furries exist is because cartoons do, so kids who watch more cartoons would certainly have a greater chance of being sexually attracted to representations of them as adolescents and adults.

Repeated visual exposure to watching humans or human representations as children are what plants the seeds of attraction or fetishes in people later in life. Adolescent hormones seem to be the water and sunlight that eventually make those seeds sprout and grow. Less social interaction is bad because it leaves less time to develop attractions towards real humans, and their features, and more time in front of a screen focusing on animation creations.

Hell sometimes it only takes viewing something at a particular moment when your brain is wiring itself for attraction. But this also means if someone is watching cartoons constantly that when these moments and periods occur the risk of it latching on to cartoons is much higher.

There small population of people who are inflation fetishists thanks to the movie Willy Wonka and the Chocolate factory. They will tell you that their fetish started with seeing that one scene in a movie. The book didn’t have that effect on the previous crop of kids, it took the visual impact of a movie to do it.

They’ve found people with pregnancy fetishes almost always have a sibling 3-5 years younger, meaning seeing a pregnant woman regularly when they were 3-6 years old was instrumental in later developing an attraction towards pregnant bodies.

Foot fetishes seem to spring from kids playing at the feet of adults a lot. (Robert Crumb claimed he developed a kink for big powerful legs and feet/shoes on women thanks to adult females letting him “ride horsey” on their feet when he was a little kid and playing under the table while his mom and her friends played cards and drank coffee.)

Obviously not every kid who obsessively watches cartoons will eventually want to fuck them, but they are certainly increasing their odds of it when a big portion of their visual stimulation comes from cartoons.
 
They asked people to willingly come forward to be contacted, of course they're getting skewed results. They would have learned a lot more just lurking in their tags and websites.

This is sadly a very common problem with modern humanistic research, and one that can't be corrected, because the consensus amongst scientists is that it would essentially amount to inhumane and unethical research if the target of said research is not conscious of being studied. This makes it almost impossible to research communities objectively, as you're simply not allowed to just infiltrate them and spy on them without their knowledge or consent.

Other major problem is that very large portion of researchers in these fields are also participants in the communities they "scientifically" study, and thus are prone to writing "research" that is essentially nothing else than advertisement and propaganda for their own religion/hobby/life-style/whatever. Humanities is rife with this shit, and honestly it's even bigger problem with the field than the strong political bias that is also infesting these sciences.
 
I dont get what the point of this blatant lying is. Furries arent popular enough for most people to care or even be aware of them to a great extent. Unlike the LGBTWTFBBQ lobby whom are able to keep their dicks in their pants for long enough to appear normal on TV, anyone taking a look at furries or going into a convention at random will see the truth, fast. Honestly. It's just a majority of horny gay dudes that like to fuck dudes
and also fuck animals so of course they will enjoy the idea of fucking animal dudes. They employ the image of a fandom like anime fans or Trekkies to mask this from the public eye. The end.
 
I've actually think it might be worthwhile studying furries.

Think about it. The furry fandom is actually larger than the majority (excluding the big seven world faiths) real life world religions. It's something that, for whatever reason, inspires grown men to act, behave and spend exorbitant amounts of money on the practice of being furry. They have devotional art, group gatherings and displays of mutual enthusiasm/piety.

I'd value an explanation of why people do this far more than a lot of other university twaddle.
 
I dont get what the point of this blatant lying is. Furries arent popular enough for most people to care or even be aware of them to a great extent. Unlike the LGBTWTFBBQ lobby whom are able to keep their dicks in their pants for long enough to appear normal on TV, anyone taking a look at furries or going into a convention at random will see the truth, fast. Honestly. It's just a majority of horny gay dudes that like to fuck dudes
and also fuck animals so of course they will enjoy the idea of fucking animal dudes. They employ the image of a fandom like anime fans or Trekkies to mask this from the public eye. The end.
RE: the "preponderance of faggotry" in the fandom - IIRC there were a few different surveys, studies, something like that that showed while gays are overrepresented in the fandom relative to society in general, they are still in the minority within the fandom. They're just usually the LOUDEST, about being furfags in particular.
 
The IARP, also known more colloquially as FurScience, is comprised of psychologists, sociologists, social workers
In other words, a "science" with no scientists.

Why study when you can gas?
We need to find out the LD50 of chlorine gas on this species first.
 
Strangely, one of the things that annoys me the most about furries is that way over half of them have to make their fursona a dog, wolf, or fox. Where is the fucking originality? Where are the pangolins, kangaroos, and seals? Or are there just a lot more dogfuckers out there than we realize?
 
Last edited:
When I was in college, I was embarrassed just to write a paper on internet culture. It wasn't respectable and it was kind of a cop out. Nobody was doing anything remotely like this. But lately I've been seeing more people doing this kind of bullshit as an actual career focus, like the people with phds in forum moderation or whatever it was. It's very weird. Somebody is wasting a lot of money.
 
Back