Mega Rad Gun Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
if you run them for long enough to actually weaken the barrel from overheating you are expected to quick swap the barrel right?
you swap barrels every other belt or 200ish rounds. if the barrel is hot enough to glow, it's ruined and you may as well shoot it through. the one and only exception were stellite barrels for the M60 where you can could go 500+ rounds without a swap if needed which is well beyond doctrine typically.

My question: could someone jury rig a watercooling jacket for a MG3/SAW and have it work like a old school watercooled gun? Like if I put a jacket and filled it with water would it just work and be heavier and less mobile with longer times between needing to stop firing / barrel warping? Or are modern guns of this type simply built different in a way that trying to push water cooling wouldn't result in improvements or cause malfunction (like idk heat stress cracks or some shit)?
with modern grenade launchers and vehicles it's also pointless to do.

water cooling is obsolete tech for weapons these days because the water has to either have a condenser unit or it'll evaporate off. air jackets were used on the vickers and some others that use a heat pump effect and that was also unnecessary anymore since long strings of fire and walking fire aren't in anyone's doctrine. it's certain possible to add another dozen lbs of water and metal to an already heavy "light" machinegun, sacrificing mobility and possibly ammo capacity (carrying the condenser, extra water, ammo itself by the gunner since you've turned a 25lb gun into a 30+ lb gun for negligible benefit). the issue was never metallurgy, but practicality.

old doctrines used MG fire as a suppression to cross fields and long strings of fire were common for places like no man's land. modern warfare is "combined arms" warfare. it isn't like the old school base and maneuver or walking fire or bombardment warefare anymore and armor is easily available. the modern battlescape favors letting the enemy waste ammo while you're in cover or have them jump at shadows or at stuff that isn't really damaged much, use short strings at area targets, and then use decap strikes (point targets for rifles, airstrikes, indirect fire like grenades or mortars) to destroy the enemy - maneuver elements to close with the enemy are really a thing in pitched battles that get bogged down in fighting like Fallujah or Ramadi. places that are built up where enemies use as strongpoints. open ground = death since the 60's.

often flanking isn't necessary either with pressure from vehicles to push up on a target and soak fire for infantry, allowing better base of fire elements to engage with vehicle mounted weapons - weapons that are far more stable and have plenty of ammo while sticking to the doctrine of short, frequent bursts at an area target like a building with windows or a field. when suppressing an open area, the barrel on an MG, especially a heavy barrel (as this was a primary upgrade for many pintle mounted MGs), allow sustained bursts for hundreds of rounds, more than enough to move a vehicle to a superior position while a maneuver element engages the enemy.
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=EbBv30yYYqQ$400 MSRP for a 5.7 isn't that bad and it's probably legal in some ban states. Seethe all you want but I like it. Might get one if I get a fat tax refund.
I'd be all over this & willing to pay a lot more than $400, if it was made by (almost) anyone other than Keltec. Sad.
(:_(


A Russian shows off his field-expedient integral AK trench periscope:
 
So basically it could work, it's just useless in modern combat doctrine and a complete waste of effort and weight. That's about what I thought thanks.
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=PZWgbPSWKg8i don't know what the fuck is going on any more and i don't want to get a tax stamp
Again, the ATF retains the opinion that all braces are stocks. HOWEVER, the courts overturned that. The ATF is appealing this. The appeal process is dragging on, so the ATF cannot act upon braces, specifically. HOWEVER, if you attach a brace with the intent of using it as a stock, they are obligated to prosecute.

Again, nothing has changed. Grifters are collecting your attention and donations.
 
My question: could someone jury rig a watercooling jacket for a MG3/SAW and have it work like a old school watercooled gun? Like if I put a jacket and filled it with water would it just work and be heavier and less mobile with longer times between needing to stop firing / barrel warping? Or are modern guns of this type simply built different in a way that trying to push water cooling wouldn't result in improvements or cause malfunction (like idk heat stress cracks or some shit)?
It's the 21st century, skip the water cooling and use thermoelectric cooling. Theoretically, one could manufacture a composite barrel that allows taking advantage of the Peltier effect when you pump some voltage into it. You'll need something like heat fins on the outside for the hot part, but the inside barrel can be the cold part.

If anyone actually makes it, name it after me.
 
IMG_9091.jpg

IMG_9092.jpg

If anyone remembers the previous drama with Q and Kevin being faggots here's a nice update as OCL posts some photos of some QC issues from Q.
 
Otter Creek labs cut open a $1200 Q suppressor and it's basic bitch shit lmao.

Edit: we posted the exact same time. Mindmeld
 

Attachments

  • 20250116_214401.jpg
    20250116_214401.jpg
    170.3 KB · Views: 49
Back
Top Bottom