- Joined
- Jun 9, 2016
yes and no. the AK has a significantly shorter sight radius than the M16, and this tends to reduce a rifleman's ability to accurate engage point targets at medium range or further. additionally the nature of notch and blade sights is often less intuitive to use than a ghost ring aperture sight (which is why nearly all competition pistols and rifle use aperture sights). lastly while the ammunition differs significantly between the AK (7.62x39mm, typically 57-N-231 and later the 57-N-231(89)) and M16 (5.56x45mm NATO, typically M193 or later the M855) the action itself produces significant recoil differences that tend to make follow-up shots more difficult to control with the AK's higher recoiling mass. in slow fire, this is often a negligible difference and both rifles are designed to be within 4 MOA (for the AK it's slightly larger at 4.5 MOA, but that's due partially to metric conversions involved and a different way of measuring accuracy). the AK-74 is significantly more accurate than the AK/AKM (about 3 MOA), owing to improved smallbore ammunition and the standardized muzzle device and more finely tuned gas system. the M16 and M16A1 was often a 2 MOA rifle with M193, but the adoption of the M855 and the 1/7 twist reduced the M16A2's accuracy slightly due to inconsistencies of the position of the mild steel core in the SS109 bullet, which some veterans familiar with it will comment on (and i've experienced it myself, preferring the older M193 and 1/12 twist as a general rule).Does the "AK is less accurate" meme still hold up when you control for maintenance and user training?
in the hands of a professional marksman the rifles are effectively indistinguishable and it boils down to a difference in familiarity and logistics. as an aside, the manual of arms for the AK is not as inferior as some suggest when they contrast the AK's controls with the M16's controls. it's simply a difference in training and methods of carrying while on patrol.
Last edited: