Mega Rad Gun Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
i have a couple Korth pieces and they're extremely nice, and imho worth the money if you're the type of person that wants the best. Janz is a close second with the nicer Dan Wesson, Colt, and SWPC pieces out there for more practical people. big fan of bespoke shotguns and rifles as well, but really for someone that isn't interested in that particular weapon and just wants a very well made handgun, there are a lot of makers out there for them.

9x21mm IMI is a little better than mediocre 9x19mm loads, with 9x23mm Win being where it's at for people that want a high pressure 9mm that isn't willing to go the 6.5 CBJ route - plenty of case capacity and easy to wildcat and drop in convert a 1911 or 2011 pistol into it with minimal effort. 9x25mm Dillon deserves a resurgence too, but the brass is annoying to make and the sharp shoulder doesn't lend well to sloppy actions or reloading once fired.
I have a couple of SWPC guns, I like them as the 'modded out from the factory so you don't have to' option.

How do you like, go about getting a Korth, like I said? I'm nowhere near any of their listed US outlets... but then their website has SHOT Show 2003 as hot news.
 
i have a couple Korth pieces and they're extremely nice, and imho worth the money if you're the type of person that wants the best. Janz is a close second with the nicer Dan Wesson, Colt, and SWPC pieces out there for more practical people. big fan of bespoke shotguns and rifles as well, but really for someone that isn't interested in that particular weapon and just wants a very well made handgun, there are a lot of makers out there for them.
Speaking of expensive handguns; I hate Cabot 1911s, but love their meteorite set. I just wish someone else had done it, or something similar.
9x21mm IMI is a little better than mediocre 9x19mm loads, with 9x23mm Win being where it's at for people that want a high pressure 9mm that isn't willing to go the 6.5 CBJ route - plenty of case capacity and easy to wildcat and drop in convert a 1911 or 2011 pistol into it with minimal effort.
9x25 Dillon? That'd be right in my wheelhouse, especially in something like a PCC.
:woo:
 
9x25 Dillon?
the "good" way to make a 9x25mm Dillon is with a quality .45 1911 (or equivalent) with a 10mm barrel, ejector, recoil spring, guide (fixed preferably), and two piece bushing (stainless steel with a brass ring for the barrel itself). 9x25mm Dillon has every bit of snap like a 10mm but higher velocity, expect cast parts to break if it's not up to snuff. you can start with a Delta Elite or similar 10mm 1911 type pistol as well, fit a 9x25mm Fusion or KKM barrel, et c. Lissner makes good barrels too if you start with a .38 super barrel and have it reamed by someone. magazines are .38 Super compatible.

you can probably convert almost any 10mm Auto handgun to 9x25 Dillon, some safer/more reliably than others. Glock 20 with a Bar-Sto barrel that's been extended a bit and ported or threaded for a compensator for example.

brass is standard 10mm Auto from starline or whatever through the Dillon Aero die, or you can buy it directly from Double Tap, et c. the case length is .990 inch or 25.1mm. i really really recommend not reloading once fired brass without careful inspection of the neck and measuring for stretch or thinning at the web (best not to do at all, honestly - treat 9x25 Dillon as if it was 10mm Auto that has a sharp shoulder and high pressure... not a good combo for reloading).
 
Last edited:
The Golden AK, from Ukraine trench-defense video:
RDT_20230222_221516321221090237221250.png
 
This is more of a history question but does anyone know what the KGB, or Red Army, thought in general about the FN FAL and the M14? They seemed pretty quick to hail Kalashnikov as a genius inventor and were gun-ho on switching to the Assault Rifle format early on- I can't imagine they were too impressed with the FN FAL sporting the hefty 7.62 NATO cartidge.

I know that when the CIA first captured blueprints, then actual rifles, of the first AKMs they thought it was ridiculous because it seemed like a stamped-metal piece of junk PPSH on Steroids and they were entirely convinced a full-sized rifle cartridge would save the day under a Marksman doctrine- only to bitterly find out that most infantry combat happened at 300 meters or less and that the AKM was the perfect weapon for Vietnam.

1df70d9ce48bd059585a219eefd173a79f39e3f0v2_hq.jpg


Pictured: First CIA Spy rough sketch of the original AK47 circa 1953
 
300 meters or less
from personal experience and training, the 300 meter rule dates back to jungle and forest (and urban) engagements from lessons learned mostly in the 1950's, with reinforcement from limited visibility scenarios in Vietnam. since the 90's, the rule of thumb for infantry engagement is 500 meters, the "half kilometer rifleman" based on direct experience in desert shield and desert storm, gothic serpent, operation lion pounce, enduring freedom, studies during the iran-iraq war, experiences shared during noble anvil and after joint enterprise (mostly snipers and bombings). much shorter than that turns into maneuver and ambush situations, and longer than that and you start losing accuracy - but heavier bullets that retain energy at longer ranges will remain more lethal than lighter bullets at that same range.

there's also something to be said for various supporting elements available when TIC from MGs, to vehicle mounted weapons to whatever is on the end of a radio call. the biggest issue i had during engagements was difficulty of 5.56 remaining lethal through barriers at extended ranges. open terrain out to 800 meters was very doable, but if the enemy has crappy wooden doors or sandbags or whatever it gets much much harder as the penetration ability was very poor and if a hit was scored, the frangibility of the M855 was also poor at that range, making survivable wounds.

it was because of these situations that the DMR came back into vogue, alongside a variety of specialty ammunition that was heavier/better at longer ranges and more recently the idea of going back to a slightly heavier bullet (.277 Fury / 6.8x51mm) with high velocity and flat trajectory is somewhat a return to form, or at least a half-step back to the 7.62x51mm (modernized .30-06).
 
Last edited:
as far as light/lasers go, is it TRL or bust? baldr lights cost remarkably less but i get the feeling i'm gonna get what i pay for.
 
as far as light/lasers go, is it TRL or bust? baldr lights cost remarkably less but i get the feeling i'm gonna get what i pay for.
Streamlight, Surefire, Insight (EOtech/L3), and in some agencies Steiner are the standard, and have been for decades. i've had good success with some off brand models (specifcally i've been impressed by several ModLite models, and one Cloud Defensive light; but i've never used any of these for active duty). when a Surefire is under $300 (assuming LEO purchase), and a TLR is a usually significantly less, it's tough to justify other brands to save $$ when it's on a weapon you intend to use for defense.

personally, the best bang for buck light on the market right now is the TLR-1. the HL is a bit too bright and risks washing out or blinding you, the 1S is good if you want a strobe function (debatable utility imho). a TLR-6 is good if you have a particular pistol in mind and aren't going to move it around and need it low profile.

if it's a recreational weapon, do whatever. 1" scope ring on an aliexpress rail section with a G2X on it and a bit of electrical tape, et c.
 
Last edited:
Ever want to see what a Civil War cannon shell looks like on the receiving end?
 
Allegedly, Smith and Wesson are soon to release a totally not slightly changed version of the Keltec Sub-2000. Side folding instead of top folding, magazine storage in the stock.
I mean, that would mostly fix the issues that people had with the sub 2000, Do you know if its mostly polymer or a bit more metal?
 
I mean, that would mostly fix the issues that people had with the sub 2000, Do you know if its mostly polymer or a bit more metal?
I can only make speculations regarding a single blurry image but since Smith gave it an Aluminum handguard I think it would be reasonable to assume that the receiver is Metal of some sort, then again at least in that lone image the receiver and handguard are two different colors, potentially as a result of the handguard being anodized aluminum and the receiver polymer. But who knows.
Regardless, Smith is showing a real trend of cloning Kel-Tec guns. I wonder if for their next trick they'll cut an M&P-12 in half to make a M&P-7.
 
Can someone tell me what the deal with this thing is? Is it even real?
looks like a homebrew revolving shotgun, maybe seized in Brazil or something. simpler to construct that a slide action or something, and is likely has faster repeat shots than a typical pipe shotgun. shotgun shells are pretty low pressure compared even to pistol rounds, so other than the novelty and appearance, the added mass up front might greatly reduce felt recoil by a significant amount.
 
Someone needs to explain how it fires though, because that barrel appears to be either almost exactly in line with or slightly to one side of the actual ejector rod/that thing the cylinder revolves around.

Barrel is in the middle and yet hammer is at the top. Something doesn't quite add up here unless there's an angle that makes this work that isn't visible.
 
Back
Top Bottom