Mega Rad Gun Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Queesechake said:
View attachment 6085235
Link
Click to expand...
Full images:
1.png
2.jpg
 
Club Sandwich said:
add the S&W 4006 to that list, great pistol.
Click to expand...
Quick aside: apart from those stupid magazine disconnects, there are some great third gen S&W pistols. I got some trigger time on a well-used 5906 not long ago and I was surprised by how much I liked it. I definitely prefer modern pistols but if that 5906 was all I had for some reason, I'd carry it confidently.
 
Dean Pentel said:
apart from those stupid magazine disconnects
Click to expand...
in case others aren't aware, drifting the rear sight and removing the plastic ejector depressor plunger (it has a small tail and is slightly larger than the FP plunger), spring, and reassembling is all that is needed to disable the magazine safety. note that the rule of depressing the ejector depressor lever when reassembling the slide is still a thing.
 
Did a little night time shooting with my Kel-Tec RDB earlier. Not a gun I would normally buy but I got it from a customer who wasn't a fan for too good of a deal to pass up. Haven't shot it a ton but it's pretty damn cool and hasn't given me an issue yet.
 
Dean Pentel said:
Quick aside: apart from those stupid magazine disconnects, there are some great third gen S&W pistols. I got some trigger time on a well-used 5906 not long ago and I was surprised by how much I liked it. I definitely prefer modern pistols but if that 5906 was all I had for some reason, I'd carry it confidently.
Click to expand...
I got a NIB 5946 a couple of years ago that was a contract over run or some surplus found in a warehouse (unsure of year of manufacture, but it was unfired), but it was like $600 and I felt that I shouldn't miss this boat like I did the 1006 years ago before even the 9mm 3rd gens go full retard on price. The DAO trigger is workable and smooth.

It's like the '70s muscle car of wonder 9's.
 
Dean Pentel said:
Quick aside: apart from those stupid magazine disconnects, there are some great third gen S&W pistols. I got some trigger time on a well-used 5906 not long ago and I was surprised by how much I liked it. I definitely prefer modern pistols but if that 5906 was all I had for some reason, I'd carry it confidently.
Click to expand...

I'm a big fan of the S&W 1076. Great pistol. I had one that had formerly been an FBI issued pistol that was in awesome shape. It either saw very little range time, or it was issued towards the end of the FBI using the 1076 and was replaced with their next sidearm shortly afterwards. I always liked the SIG style decock lever on them. Wish I still had it.
 
WhatInTheActualFuck said:
Florida will happily let you drive any goddamned thing. Sometimes it's awesome, sometimes it just creates danger for anyone else in the vicinity.
Click to expand...
If Josh ends up in Florida and gets the humvee, he needs to deck it out like this one:
ateda0slqya41.jpg
Guns upon guns. 50 cal, multiple m240s, i think a m249, etc. A Ork Battlewagon if I've ever seen one.
 
Bump stock ban is unconstitutional!
Clarence Thomas said:
A bump stock does not convert a semiautomatic rifle into a machinegun any more than a shooter with a lightning-fast trigger finger does. Even with a bump stock, a semiautomatic rifle will fire only one shot for every ‘function of the trigger
Click to expand...
1718375007189.png 1718375016680.png
Full Opinion (Archive)
 

Attachments

LMAO the ATF admitted that slam firing is semi automatic despite the trigger not moving at all, which completely undermined their “single function of the trigger” argument:
Opinion of the Court said:
Moreover, a semiautomatic rifle with a bump stock is indistinguishable from another weapon that ATF concedes cannot fire multiple shots “automatically”: the Ithaca Model 37 shotgun. The Model 37 allows the user to “slam fire”— that is, fire multiple shots by holding down the trigger while operating the shotgun’s pump action. Each pump ejects the spent cartridge and loads a new one into the chamber. If the shooter is holding down the trigger, the new cartridge will fire as soon as it is loaded. According to ATF, the Model 37 fires more than one shot by a single function of the trigger, but it does not do so “automatically” because the shooter must manually operate the pump action with his nontrigger hand. See 83 Fed. Reg. 66534. That logic mandates the same result here. Maintaining the proper amount of forward pressure on the front grip of a bump-stock equipped rifle is no less additional input than is operating the pump action on the Model 37.
Click to expand...
The opinion also has some really clear diagrams showing how the AR-15's trigger group works:
1718375858819.png 1718375865144.png 1718375870311.png 1718375876872.png
 
First the private gun sale thing was put on hold for a few states/certain members of certain groups, then the pistol brace rule was vacated, and now the bumpstock ban ruled unconstitutional. The nigger faggots at the ATF just can't stop losing this week. :story:

 
As far as I know states can't make unconstitutional laws, and since this was ruled unconstitutional they wouldn't be able to make a law banning bump stocks, and if they did it could very easily be removed since it has already been ruled by the highest court to be unconstitutional. I'm not a law fag though so maybe I'm wrong. My state told the feds to fuck off in 2021 and said they wouldn't be enforcing any new federal gun laws after that.
 
Queesechake said:
As far as I know states can't make unconstitutional laws, and since this was ruled unconstitutional they wouldn't be able to make a law banning bump stocks, and if they did it could very easily be removed since it has already been ruled by the highest court to be unconstitutional. I'm not a law fag though so maybe I'm wrong. My state told the feds to fuck off in 2021 and said they wouldn't be enforcing any new federal gun laws after that.
Click to expand...
It sounds like they smacked down the ATF reclassification based on rule interpretation. This is unlikely to have applicability to laws that specifically say 'you can't have this thing'.

It's just that the ATF cannot on their own say 'it machine gun' with such a flimsy excuse.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom