Usually a .357. Been using grandpa's old colt python for a long while and a week or so ago found a S&W 627-5 a little cheaper than usual and having always wanted one that gave me the justification to grab it. All my hog shots so far have been at night with a AR but I see more and more hogs around and them things are mean.
You should go to gun shops and browse the used guns. The 629 I'm currently waiting on picking up was only $800. You can go save some money by buying a reproduction SAA or Schofield from Uberti or Cimarron.
I actually kind of like this thing.
I'm conflicted; part of me likes it, but at the same time kinda hates it. Must investigate further.
I could see myself owning one of these (if someone makes a version that doesn't require me to pay off ATF-faggots - or is way cheaper) because of its novelty.
Ruger offered the P89 in .30 luger which has the same dimensions as 7.62x25 (Tokarev is loaded much hotter tho). Being a P89 though it could handle the hot loads. Mags were in 15 or 10 rounds. I can't remember if this was during the AWB days or not.
it's intended to be completely flush with the front of the receiver, which matches the position of the rear sight aperture of all previous variants of the M16. the front cross bolt is in slot T13, with the rear cross bolt in T2.
Do you mean 7.63 Mauser? .30 Luger would be 7.65x21.
Everybody whos ever had to use one wishes they had a regular shotgun. This thing is a debacle.
If it's gen 4 or 5 the Glock Performance Trigger is supposed to be pretty good, per James at TFBTV, and 4.5lbs.
Just get good with the stock mush. I've never felt held back by the stock trigger in gen 5 19/17/45. I have no idea why people spend $150+ on a slightly better trigger for a Glock. I recall seeing a video for a Johnny Glocks kit that was like $350 and I couldn't figure out why someone would spend 60% of the price of the gun on a replacement trigger.
I'd be curious to hear from more "operational" shooters how much the squish really matters in the heat of the moment. I can see it being a bit funky when slowly lining up shots at a range, but in the moments it really counts it seems you's be plowing through the squish in barely a split second.
It flat out doesn't matter at all, at least with gen 5 triggers. I know gen 3 triggers were a tad bit worse (no experience with gen 4), but the mush is incredibly overstated.
shorten the mainspring tension screw with a file slightly (and i do mean slightly, 1/32"). you can find the good position for your preference by backing it out. combine this with a lighter (13lb at the lower limit since you will start getting light strikes around there, the factory spring is 18 or 20 depending on the year made, and a 16 is very reliable while being lighter on DA pull).
overwatch or apex imho, but the glock performance trigger is probably the best for carry use.
it really doesn't matter much apart from follow up shots and even then it's trained through. i have shot Glocks in combat, LE training, PPC, bullseye, steel challenge, and 3 gun. mush isn't really a thing except in slow fire and it's mostly for people that aren't following through on the decision to shoot and "pulling through" the trigger to complete the action. the mush sensitives i know are the type to slow squeeze and stop just after the bang, which isn't great as a shooting method without a light single action hammer to provide the crisp feel. the Glock's "ramp" has a totally different feel and shooting well with it is a training thing.
My Johnny Glock trigger on my 43x breaks like glass. You get what you pay for.
I actually kinda agree and kinda disargee.