Not being in the US I had never looked into gun prices; for whatever reason I didn't expect them to be so affordable.
The very vast majority of firearms available for purchase in the US today are similar or identical to designs that were first Introduced 50-125 years ago.
Man has been making complex firearms since about 1600 onwards (in small, artisinall quantities for wealthy persons) and the first machinegun was built in 1884 with hand cranked gatling guns being made 20 years before that.
Firearms are not particularly hard goods to manufacture and the only reason many of them are priced the way they are is because of
1. Branding
2. Profit motive
3. Quality Control
4. Proprietary technology/features.
5. Government regulation
One of America's biggest firearms manufacturers and retailers, Palmetto State Armory, sells a Glock clone called a Dagger for less than $300 on a regular basis. Turks are able to import pump action shotguns at like $40 per unit with a sales price of $120.
The Army might be doing something even dumber in relation to the NGSW Program
This is said to be a product improved version of the XM-7 at the recent DSEI Arms show
-Fixed Stock
-10.5in barrel
-Lightened BCG and Barrel
-Side charging handle is retained but now made out of polymer
-Empty weight 7.5lbs
SLX Suppressors now also have heat shield options (and the suppressor is sad to have been shortened, unclear if it has been fattened any to gain back volume)
IDEX (at least probably at IDEX) Sig showed off an XM7 Iteration with no folding stock and an unsuppressed weight of 7.7lbs
They were showing off a variant with a fixed stock at IDEX
But now for something really interesting
Here's a similar rifle at Fort Benning equipped with a MFMD Suppressor and what looks to be the rare and obscure Vortex "Elanor" LPVO (Same one for the UKSF KS-1 Contract). Where's the XM-157?
If we refer to this post I made
AGPinochet tries to definitively with a relatively high degree of confidence try to settle the discussion as to whether 6.8x51 military pressure loadings with EPR Projectiles can consistently penetrate body armor at ranges where that actually matters / AGPinochet plays amateur ballistician armed with YouTube videos and extrapolations
We'll be reminded that the XM-7 probably can't penetrate any half decent armor at any considerable distance, but by chopping 2.5in off the barrel you're only lessening the velocity (and increasing flash and sound signature but more on that in a minute) thus further lessening armor penetration capabilities, especially at distance.
So we have a rifle that initially had a short barrel and a high pressure cartridge that looks to chew through barrels and suppressors that weighs more and carries less ammo that may or may not be getting replaced with a variant of said rifle that is going to have an even shorter barrel, presumably the same high pressure cartridge that will chew through suppressors faster due to increased muzzle blast no matter how thick they make the blast baffle, that weighs less (at the cost of ballistic performance), whose barrel will heat up faster playing hell with accuracy and reducing lifespan that has the same ammunition capacity and loadout reductions but now with more flash and sound signature.
Bravo, Army.
For the same price (and be honest here, probably less) than all the money spent on the NGSW program they could have issued every Rifleman an URGI or similar premium AR Upper with the Army's choice of optics and suppressor and loaded it with an advanced ammunition solution from True Velocity, FN, Shell Shock or Federal.
Or they could have invested the money in literally anything else (small arms are largely irrelevant in terms of actually killing people in war)