This was always the case. Way too many guntubers are looking at that gun from the perspective of how it is as a gun, and not thinking about in how it works in practice with the infantryman. It could be 100% reliable, sub MOA gun with great shooting characteristics. It would still be a giant piece of shit to issue for a rifleman, when it weights double that of a 5.56 rifle, and you cut the combat load of ammunition to half, with not really added benefit.Ian strongly criticizes the XM7 rifle in today's video and even replied to my snark comment from the YT shitpost account
View attachment 8078178
I may be misremembering but I don't remember any negativity at all. The 3d-printed suppressor was especially-hyped IIRC.
Today's vid cued to the XM7 beat-down:
Now it's "a low capacity, overpowered, fragile rifle that can't be effectively manufactured yet." Poor Sig.
Bloke on the Range used a perfect term to describe the M7, it's just turning misses to more expensive misses. 99.999% of the shots fired in combat don't hit the enemy. For suppressive fire, 5.56 works just as well and you can carry twice as much of it.

