Mega Rad Gun Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
8.6 blackout just got approved by SAAMI. The recommended barrel twist rate is 1:6. Not 1:3 like they submitted. This won’t stop people from putting 1:3 barrels on but will cover the ammo manufacturers when someone puts a cup and core bullet through a 1:3 twist barrel and blows up their suppressor.
Huh, I never thought that would happen. Now I am sure they will approve 458 SOCOM, right? Any day now... Was there actually evidence of rounds separating due to the twist rate, or was that just handwringing by people worried about lawsuits?
 
Brice keeps on giving
roswell939.PNG

You can read roswells FAQ where they go over this
Overview:

There are multiple standards for 9x39 ammunition, even within brands like Wolf and Tula, which use different projectile diameters and headspace specifications. During our development with Wolf ammo, we noticed inconsistent loading pressures between production lots. Tula ammo showed similar issues; for example, at the SHOT Show, we received demo ammunition with lighter loads than those we tested with in-house, causing functional failures in our weapons.

Chamber Variability:

Chamber dimensions vary significantly between 9x39 Wolf, 9x39 Russian, 9x39 CIP, and several 9.3x39 variants. We’ve observed these differences firsthand using tooling for all these types, and some were even mislabeled by manufacturers. Key differences include shoulder angle and length, which we’ve measured between 10° and 17°. These discrepancies can cause excessive brass stretching and neck failures upon firing.

Projectile size:

During the development of weapons and suppressors, we identified inconsistencies in projectile dimensions. The Wolf and Tula ammunition showed a size range of .358” to .364” (9.09 mm to 9.245 mm). In contrast, the orginal 2017 barrels were designed with a bore diameter of .354” (9 mm), a groove diameter of .364” (9.25 mm), and a rifling depth of .005” (.125 mm).

This variation in projectile size significantly impacted performance. Some lots of ammunition functioned better than others. Twice upon receiving a new case of ammo, gas port locations had to be adjusted to ensure proper cycling in non-suppressed AR platforms. These issues became particularly apparent when new cases of ammunition arrived, further complicating the original development project.

Different and inconsistent loads:

Pressure differences due to changes in the powder loads were also observed and documented.

Our Solution:

To address these compatibility issues, we’ve partnered with Starline and MÔS-Tek to develop barrels, projectiles, and cases that function seamlessly together. Our goal is to establish a new standard, the 9x39US, featuring a .364" / 9.245mm bullet diameter with a 278-grain weight. Additionally, we have created custom dies for reloading.

What Does This Mean for You?

Using our ammo and barrels ensures compatibility. Our ammo is also compatible with KAK barrels and barrels sold by Wolf, Tactical Kinetics, Krebs Customs, and Piedmont Cartridge. However, we observed some case separations in high-volume, full-auto firing—over 1,000 rounds in a few hours on a hot day. Adjusting the head space solved this issue. For optimal performance, consult a gunsmith and use our gauges to confirm correct headspace.

If you’re using a different combination of ammo and barrels, please consult a qualified gunsmith to ensure safety. We have standardized on a .364" (9.245 mm), 278-grain projectile. Any other diameter should not be used with our barrels or cases.

Key Differences in all 9x39 Ammunition:

Shoulder Angle: Varies from 10° to 17° among manufacturers, impacting shoulder length.

Headspace: Variations up to 0.03" in headspace can affect accuracy, ejection reliability, and may lead to case separations.

Projectiles: observed variations between 3.62" / 9.21mm to 3.66" /9.3mm.

TLDR Wolf/Tula wildy different in spec, they want to eliminate any issues
Brice has also shown his NEW in house DROP IN trigger
bricetrigger.PNG

bricetrigger2.PNG
bricetrigger3.PNG
bricetrigger4.PNG
bricetrigger5.PNG
In my humble, lowly face value opinion, this trigger pack is retarded. I mean seriously, look at it. There appears to be two separate disconnectors that sit by themselves. This thing is held in place by 4 separate pins. The actual trigger is screwed in (will it be Phillip's screws? Torx are expensive and I can use the money for meth). It feels like the design is AI generated, I am trying my hardest not to suffer an aneurysm from laughter while looking at this thing. What the fuck dude.
Also I just want to point out that if the trigger were to fail in any way you'd have to hope he stays in business long enough for replacement parts (except maybe the AR spring, if thats whats modeled here)
 
Last edited:
Se

Seems counter productive. Why compromise cheek weld for your main optic to be able to use irons that you won’t use anyway?
because i'm here for one thing and one thing only; to ask questions with zero forethought. it turns out the little cut out piece foam i was going to wrap with grip tape does in fact make it less easy to look down the irons
 
I guess that explains why Midway sold me a 1:3 barrel a couple months ago at like 70% off.
General timeline for things like this is SAAMI members know what is coming from SAAMI 6 months in advance. While MidwayUSA is not a SAAMI member they are a major seller of all the major ammo manufacturers, who also happen to be a whose who of SAAMI voting members. Also for your safety please only shoot solid copper rounds through that barrel.
Huh, I never thought that would happen. Now I am sure they will approve 458 SOCOM, right? Any day now... Was there actually evidence of rounds separating due to the twist rate, or was that just handwringing by people worried about lawsuits?
As far as I have heard it’s just hand wringing. The thing to remember is SAAMI exists as a legal defense for its members. These are set of defined standards that are accepted by the industry. If you blow your gun up by using a 1:3 barrel the defense when you sue the ammo maker will be that the recommended twist rate is 1:6 and you did something outside of industry norms so it’s not their fault.

As to if it’s an issue, the stated reference round is a 200gr bullet with a muzzle velocity of 2200 fps. Out of a 1:3 twist barrel the gives you a spin speed of 528000 rpm. Going to a 1:6 twist barrel drops that to 264000 rpm.

For comparison 55gr 223 rounds with a muzzle velocity of ~3100 fps when fired out of a 1:7 twist barrel have a spin speed of 319000 rpm. There are known issues with varmint rounds, which have thin jacket walls to aid rapid expansion, self destructing on exit from a 1:7 twist barrel.

TLDR: while I don’t know of any tests performed considering issues other bullets have at much lower spin speeds it is a valid concern.
 
I guess that explains why Midway sold me a 1:3 barrel a couple months ago at like 70% off.
Glad to hear that they found a compromise on the 8.6. the other .338 subs don't make any sense at all.

you'd still better served by a .338 Win Mag or .338-06 for all realistic applications though.

Reminder to shoot in all weather conditions to make sure your shit works. I went shooting in the blowing snow and 20 degree wind today. I could still shoot my Colt with my gloves on but I was certainly encumbered by it to some extent.
image0(3).jpeg.webp
 
Last edited:
devil on my shoulder

angel on my shoulder
There are disadvantages to SBR. You are supposed to notify the ATF if you bring it out of state, and you can’t just let someone borrow it.

Also some states are more favorable to pistols than SBRs for keeping it loaded in your vehicle.

That being said, I can’t stand pistol braces and would rather deal with the SBR downsides.

I do keep an AR lower with a brace just in case.
 
Just ran 150 rounds of .45 Colt +P. Used all 3 boxes of my Hornady XTP MAG hollow points.
300grs pushed by 22grs of Hodgdon H110, enough to kill any thing that creepeth or crawleth on my mountain.
I seated them a little long to decrease peak pressure and to make sure they can't chamber in a Single Action Army cylinder. And I put a heavy crimp on them for consistency and to avoid bullet pull.
300gr XTP MAG.jpeg
 
Brice keeps on giving
Oh no nigga! The guns don't work with fucking garbage quality Wolf ammo! Which isn't being imported anymore! The remaining supply if which will inevitably shot up! Smoke that meth Brice! Own those Roswellsisters!
Brice has also shown his NEW in house DROP IN trigger
>"The original striker fired mechanism"
Uh oh, Brice might be telling on himself here.

From what I understand I believe it's established that Brice first rebuilt a Molot Arms blank fire kit, then built the AR-VSS Abomination. Now, I've mentioned in this thread that the Molot Arms VSS's are different from the real deal, as the Molot "guns" (legally toys under Russian law) are striker fired, while real Val/VSS/SR series guns use a Linear hammer and a separate spring loaded firing pin. He also claims to have a CAD Package, I think it's possible, assuming he didn't misspeak that he hasn't done any research and legitimately thinks the Molot Blank fire units are aside from build quality 100% mechanically accurate to real VSS/VAL/SR guns. However I'm like 80% sure Roswell is also using an inaccurate striker mechanism.

@SinistralRifleman
Tell FocusTripp to tell Brice to come here so we can bully him and he CA crashout about people more competent than him building better guns

Funny Maymays
1769829463958.jpeg
Also, up to date Booking photo
1769830028323.jpeg
1769830058942.jpeg

View "through" a special occluded eye gun sight for a Makarov PB that under night vision resembles a floating reticle
1769830326646.jpeg

1769829311087.jpeg

Ruger PC9 FRT By Advanced Reset Tech


A-545
1769830419288.jpeg

OTs-12 and 9A-91 with wood furniture, I wonder if this is what inspired the VSK-94 in Metro 2033 to have a wooden handguard
1769830482637.png

Domestic Russian bullpup conversions
1769830631157.jpeg
1769830657459.jpeg
1769830677152.jpeg

You may remember in previous posts many months ago I was really confused by photos I was finding of modified AS Val's with AR stocks and really short suppressors. I now know what they are. They're apparently an Export variant called "Shadow" and come packaged with a barrel/sleeve flash hider thst allows you to QD the suppressor like normal and turn it into a compact assault carbine.









Another company alongside Angstadt is in the no baffle suppressor game
 
Brice keeps on giving
roswell939.PNG

You can read roswells FAQ where they go over this

I love this crackhead, he never disappoints. How does he even have an FFL?

Ill be the guinea pig and blow my hand apart with some underwood hardcast because I've already got one ordered

When does the Rhino arrive if you don't mind me asking? I've been holding off on buying one until you make sure it doesn't delete your hand on the first shot.
 
I love this crackhead, he never disappoints. How does he even have an FFL?



When does the Rhino arrive if you don't mind me asking? I've been holding off on buying one until you make sure it doesn't delete your hand on the first shot.
almost no gun will detonate on the first shot with properly loaded ammo. Cumulative stress, flame cutting and flawed material is what leads to seemingly sudden catastrophic failures.

S&W's Scandium frames do not fare well with stress or corrosion/erosion
329pd.jpg
notice that the fracture point was at the cylinder gap where hot gas and pressure put the most stress on the frame.
340pd.jpg
similar failure as above but not as catastrophic. this 340PD actually continued to function. the failure was not noticed immediately. These Scandium guns should only be used with defensive magnum ammuniton for carry only, not practice. practice should be done with low powered target ammo such as the old 158gr round nose "widow maker" load (because if you shoot someone with it, they'll make your wife a widow) or wadcutters.

Luckily most all revolvers that fail, fail upward. the top strap flies off into the wild blue yonder, maybe the barrel flies down range. If ammunition caused the failure, the top of the cylinder goes as well.

chiappa_rhino_30ds_1_1.png
The Rhino however, being upside down in orientation from a normal revolver fails downward, into the shooters hands. The frame, being aluminum also suffers from the effects of stress over time like scandium but to a lesser degree.

For many years S&W, Colt and Charter arms among others warned customers to not shoot +p ammunition in aluminum or other alloy framed revolvers, and advised police departments to only load +p ammunition for carry only and to practice with standard pressure ammunition in that revolvers given cartridge. Colt specified that alloy revolvers used with +P ammunition must under go a full tear down and inspection every 1,000 rounds, S&W had similar guidance.
 
The Rhino however, being upside down in orientation from a normal revolver fails downward, into the shooters hands. The frame, being aluminum also suffers from the effects of stress over time like scandium but to a lesser degree.

This was always my worry shooting my old 40DS, no matter how many times I shot it I worried about a failure. That step up to .44 worries me.
 
Back
Top Bottom