Mega Rad Gun Thread

  • 🔎 If you see an alert for analytics.usips.org, this is a self-hosted system I am running as a test. It is GDPR compliant and collects no invasive information.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Thank God fucking finally. NICS for a fucking tube is still annoying but this is a huge victory!

@Null time for you to get a suppressor on everything without giving up all your information to the feds!
 
(Still need to engrave for now, the pens are 10$ at harbor freight)

IT APPEARS THEY SAID THEY WILL NOT ENFORCE ​

1791583097452.png 1791583104623.png

​

 
Last edited:
SaidNoOneEver said:
I think I'm going to wait a while before refreshing the page and having someone break my heart explaining how you're mistaken....
Click to expand...
The one moderately large asterix on this is that it’s not a change in law, it’s a change in ATF policy. The judgement in the case the ATF cites for this change goes pretty much as follows:
1. The NFA was based around the federal governments powers of taxation
2. Congress eliminated the taxes/fees associated with some NFA items
3. Therefore, the feds have no legal basis to enforce any requirements of the NFA on those items.

The court strategically declined to rule on the 2nd amendment claims made by the plaintiff, arguing that the tax argument made them unnecessary. Theoretically, a future congress could reinstate the tax stamp fees and then the whole apparatus would become legally enforceable again. It’s really good for right now, especially since the (probably) explosive growth in sales for these items after this would lend more credence to them being protected under Bruen as in ‘common use’, but it’s not the end of the line for the NFA
 
August Levasseur said:
The one moderately large asterix on this is that it’s not a change in law, it’s a change in ATF policy. The judgement in the case the ATF cites for this change goes pretty much as follows:
1. The NFA was based around the federal governments powers of taxation
2. Congress eliminated the taxes/fees associated with some NFA items
3. Therefore, the feds have no legal basis to enforce any requirements of the NFA on those items.

The court strategically declined to rule on the 2nd amendment claims made by the plaintiff, arguing that the tax argument made them unnecessary. Theoretically, a future congress could reinstate the tax stamp fees and then the whole apparatus would become legally enforceable again. It’s really good for right now, especially since the (probably) explosive growth in sales for these items after this would lend more credence to them being protected under Bruen as in ‘common use’, but it’s not the end of the line for the NFA
Click to expand...
And this is why we need the damned supreme court to finally just fucking say once and for all that "shall not be infringed" means shall not be infringed.
 

Attachments

Althalus said:
Hello, I recently purchased an old Mauser 98. Got it online from a private listing and had it shipped, the listing said "Mauser k98" (technically "k98" was incorrect for that model) but it otherwise looked accurate from the pictures.

When I picked it up from the dealer, the gun had Cyrillic writing on it, which caused me to do some research and realize that, while it was technically a Mauser 98, it was a Yugoslavian Model 1924 variant. Further inspection revealed that the bolt and the floor plate had been replaced at some point, as the serial numbers there differed. It also had a small barrel mark showing that it was imported by Navy Arms at some point, explaining why a German-Yugo gun wound up in the U.S.

I included all the context above, because the seller clearly didn't know what he had, and didn't include any stripper clips so he might not have used it much.

My question is, how do I verify if it's safe to shoot? I have other guns but those were purchased new, this is my first antique model and given the age + replacement parts, I am slightly wary that it could blow up in my face.
Click to expand...
It's a mauser, fucking send that bitch.
 
p1138 said:
And this is why we need the damned supreme court to finally just fucking say once and for all that "shall not be infringed" means shall not be infringed.
Click to expand...
In other words, this is also politics, I guarantee you if the dems get in power again they're gonan raise that tax to 200,000 usd.

But while we're at it.

HOW DOES THAT MAKE YOU FEEL BIISH :diddler:? FUDDS, CUCKS, BRADY?

Found online... Not gonna lie, this isn't flawless victory, more like brutality.
lel.webp
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom