Infected MGTOW - Men Going Their Own Way

Its pretty interesting. He bitches about corporate bullshit, moral panics and censorship without realizing that Japan has all of these problems but much worse.

A bit late but
Japancuck.png


has anyone noticed mgtow terms becoming more common?
or is it just me?

I recently noticed many terms from specified subject areas become more common in either mainstream or a different subgroup.
For example you can say gaslightning or toxic, which originated from psychology, getting recently used by crybabys to invalidate others arguments.

The term redpilled is being used more often to describe not the MGTOW redpill as such, but several redpills concerning political topics instead. Clown World and based are also widely-used now, but I am not as deep into this to say as if those terms first originated from right-wing or MGTOW, since the overlap between those two groups is pretty significant.
 
Last edited:
The term redpilled is being used more often to describe not the MGTOW redpill as such, but several redpills concerning political topics instead. Clown World and based are also widely-used now, but I am not as deep into this to say as if those terms first originated from right-wing or MGTOW, since the overlap between those two groups is pretty significant.
MGTOWs co-opted it from the 9/11 Truth movement and the conspiracy community generally, where it was used as a metaphor for escaping the establishment narrative. It never really started with them. Clown World originated from /pol/ and the Right, and based is just an internet slang adoption from rap music.
 
I recently noticed many terms from specified subject areas become more common in either mainstream or a different subgroup.
For example you can say gaslightning or toxic, which originated from psychology, getting recently used by crybabys to invalidate others arguments.

The term redpilled is being used more often to describe not the MGTOW redpill as such, but several redpills concerning political topics instead. Clown World and based are also widely-used now, but I am not as deep into this to say as if those terms first originated from right-wing or MGTOW, since the overlap between those two groups is pretty significant.
I've also heard terms like hypergamy
or if not the words irself, a situation that describes just that.
i saw a Louis Rossmann video where he was talking about rents in New York buildings being sky high and always vacant, and he used the comparison of a woman who "thinks she deserves to date a pro NBA player."
that's hypergamy if I've ever heard it.
even some people in the comments noted the inclusion. i think a significant amount of young males are either MGTOW or MGTOW sympathizers.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Executive Petrel
I've also heard terms like hypergamy
or if not the words irself, a situation that describes just that.
i saw a Louis Rossmann video where he was talking about rents in New York buildings being sky high and always vacant, and he used the comparison of a woman who "thinks she deserves to date a pro NBA player."
that's hypergamy if I've ever heard it.
even some people in the comments noted the inclusion. i think a significant amount of young males are either MGTOW or MGTOW sympathizers.
I would doubt they even know what MGTOW is, but most men throughout history have been aware women behave that way. I've heard people born in the 1920s (men and women) talk about the phenomenon but use different words and metaphors. They might talk about "prince charming" or a corporate executive instead of an NBA player for example, but they understand the type of person you mean.

The only thing that's changed is the societal connotation of understanding and discussing that kind of person. Now it's considered taboo in some circles to criticize gold-diggers or people with outsized expectations, but back then most people understood they existed and thought they were stupid or naïve. Now it's morphed into a parasocial "movement" that "gurus" will teach men a tiny sliver of common sense about dating habits and then tack on random trash, and on the flip-side if you say obvious things in public a different group people calls you a misogynist.
 
except for the fact that the comments literally referenced MGTOW/Redpill by name.
the words female hypergamy were all over the comments even though he never said the word.
I meant Rossman but yeah I'm sure the commenters know.
 
I did catch myself using "moneky-branching" in real life once and immediately had to explain what it meant (when a woman is in a supposedly committed relationship but still on the lookout for a man with more money or status to ditch her current boyfriend for).
That's not really a mgtow thing though either, people describe career plans like that commonly. Some of these terms or concepts aren't really mgtow on their own, but when run together and integrated into a entire world view, bitterness and all, then it's definitely mgtow.
 
Yeah LOL. Used to be in his Discord and my god it was a dumpster fire. I could name a lot of problems that the server had that nobody would explain since his server has been shut down.
RGE's discord server is still around. I've been a member of it for a very long time now, though I haven't even looked at it in probably almost a year. There were always a lot of niggerposts and other edgy autistic teenage stuff. Tons of hentai and weeaboo perversion in general, obviously. Never saw any fedposting, though.
Misandry Today "DDJ" has been found. Anyone surprised that this is what a MGTOW looks like?
View attachment 2885885
If DDJ's stories were true, he had a wife and kids at some point. Someone liked him enough to let him put a ring on her finger.

Speaking of DDJ, I never heard if his lolsuit against Google ever went anywhere.
 
I recently noticed many terms from specified subject areas become more common in either mainstream or a different subgroup.
For example you can say gaslightning or toxic, which originated from psychology, getting recently used by crybabys to invalidate others arguments.
has anyone noticed mgtow terms becoming more common?
Academia are constantly churning out new authoritative sounding terms for all their causes, leaving (especially young, white men) without even a vocabulary to describe how they feel.

The mainstream left squeezes them, hammers them to the point of desperation. And in their desperation, they turn to movements they don't fully understand because at least they have words.
 
RGE's discord server is still around. I've been a member of it for a very long time now, though I haven't even looked at it in probably almost a year. There were always a lot of niggerposts and other edgy autistic teenage stuff. Tons of hentai and weeaboo perversion in general, obviously. Never saw any fedposting, though.

If DDJ's stories were true, he had a wife and kids at some point. Someone liked him enough to let him put a ring on her finger.

Speaking of DDJ, I never heard if his lolsuit against Google ever went anywhere.
It failed miserably. I'm not sure why anyone thought that it wouldn't. He never told his audience about it because his NPD would never let him admit to failing. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/5fghox5f13m0um9/AACKqc9-NOzLNpgVJINYPPsQa?dl=0

He got married twice. Had 4 kids and is a deadbeat dad. Other than that, most of his stories were lies. Getting married wasn't exactly a difficult feat in the 80's and 90's.
 
Last edited:
>scare off women
Duh, that's the point.
I guess my point is some of them DO get relationships (some are even married, which is funny as that is the opposite of MGTOW), just not on their terms. A lot of women accept sexist men, but these men are bitter.

Incels literally can't get dates or relationships(because they are weird, ugly, or mentally ill). MGTOWs are just men who are upset they can get relationships but they can't beat women around.
 
MGTOWs are just men who are upset they can get relationships but they can't beat women around.
You were somewhat correct until this part. In my experience, most of the MGTOW were men who were screwed over by their women (cheated on, divorced, lost child custody) etc. Which is why they are MGTOW in the first place; they see the system as stacked against men and encourage men to simply escape the rigged game by choosing not to play at all. Most would probably mock men who beat around women as angry assholes who are lashing out to try to grasp what little control over their lives they can get, instead of actually taking real control over their lives.
 
You were somewhat correct until this part. In my experience, most of the MGTOW were men who were screwed over by their women (cheated on, divorced, lost child custody) etc. Which is why they are MGTOW in the first place; they see the system as stacked against men and encourage men to simply escape the rigged game by choosing not to play at all. Most would probably mock men who beat around women as angry assholes who are lashing out to try to grasp what little control over their lives they can get, instead of actually taking real control over their lives.
Not literally physically abuse women, but they are upset they can't disrespect women in the way men could decades ago.

Funny some of the most popular MGTOWs are not just married, but got married AFTER becoming MGTOW. And their wives are average looking, age appropriate, and often overweight. Yet these men talk about the "wall" and how men should avoid marriage.
 
Not literally physically abuse women, but they are upset they can't disrespect women in the way men could decades ago.

Funny some of the most popular MGTOWs are not just married, but got married AFTER becoming MGTOW. And their wives are average looking, age appropriate, and often overweight. Yet these men talk about the "wall" and how men should avoid marriage.
The most popular ones I know of, like Turd Flinging Monkey, aren't, to my knowledge, married. Maybe the ones that are have found that infamous, mythical trad wife that people talk about. The most hardcore and evangelistic ones seem to be single, though.
 
Last edited:
i was taught to never hit a girl.

but i hate women!
I understand friend, but I'll explain the issue:
See, women don't like admitting they've lost to men, possibly due to an enormously inflated ego and the instinctual female drive to avoid responsibility.

So while hitting women is definitely a fine thing to do and a great way to get exercise, if you want to prove a point you should try to lean more towards mental forms of subversion in order to give them less ammunition to convince themselves and others that they're a victim.

Here are a couple ideas on how to psychologically undermine women without triggering their victimhood reflex:
  • Quietly stand in places they don't expect then wait for them to notice you, like off to the side when you know they're about to enter a room. The longer it takes for them to notice you standing there the better.
  • Text them "You'd better stop that" or "That doesn't seem like a good idea" at random points. No matter how many times you do it it will confuse and make them second guess themselves for a moment, regardless of what they're doing. It will also plant the idea that you're watching them.
  • Deliberately argue with them about doing something you both know needs to get done, then wait until she's not expecting it and do whatever it is. In a best case scenario she won't realize and will come back to nag you about it later, at which point you say "What the heck are you talking about woman, ___ is already done" and she'll feel silly for not noticing, but she will also wonder if the only reason you even argued with her to begin with is because she was being confrontational. Obviously that isn't the case, but cultivating self-doubt will only make your job easier in the long run.
  • Loud noises: I hesitate to include this option because one has to be judicious in its use. If it comes off as too aggressive it will allow a woman to share her experiences with other women without feeling ridiculous for doing so, and in every case if multiple women get together to commiserate a man will wind up being the bad guy by the end, no matter how clear it is that the women are at fault. We need to avoid that. Try things like opening doors somewhat loudly when she isn't expecting it, etc., mundane things she'd feel dumb admitting to others that she gets startled by.
I'll leave it there. So again while you can still beat women, it's better to adopt a more modern, refined approach of exploiting the psychological weaknesses and insecurities of the female sex rather than the physical ones in the pursuit of fostering a healthy sense of humility in women, in the same way one must correct those dumb tiny dogs so they respect your orders and don't become loud and aggressive and make life hell for everyone around them. MGTOW brother.
 
I understand friend, but I'll explain the issue:
See, women don't like admitting they've lost to men, possibly due to an enormously inflated ego and the instinctual female drive to avoid responsibility.

So while hitting women is definitely a fine thing to do and a great way to get exercise, if you want to prove a point you should try to lean more towards mental forms of subversion in order to give them less ammunition to convince themselves and others that they're a victim.

Here are a couple ideas on how to psychologically undermine women without triggering their victimhood reflex:
  • Quietly stand in places they don't expect then wait for them to notice you, like off to the side when you know they're about to enter a room. The longer it takes for them to notice you standing there the better.
  • Text them "You'd better stop that" or "That doesn't seem like a good idea" at random points. No matter how many times you do it it will confuse and make them second guess themselves for a moment, regardless of what they're doing. It will also plant the idea that you're watching them.
  • Deliberately argue with them about doing something you both know needs to get done, then wait until she's not expecting it and do whatever it is. In a best case scenario she won't realize and will come back to nag you about it later, at which point you say "What the heck are you talking about woman, ___ is already done" and she'll feel silly for not noticing, but she will also wonder if the only reason you even argued with her to begin with is because she was being confrontational. Obviously that isn't the case, but cultivating self-doubt will only make your job easier in the long run.
  • Loud noises: I hesitate to include this option because one has to be judicious in its use. If it comes off as too aggressive it will allow a woman to share her experiences with other women without feeling ridiculous for doing so, and in every case if multiple women get together to commiserate a man will wind up being the bad guy by the end, no matter how clear it is that the women are at fault. We need to avoid that. Try things like opening doors somewhat loudly when she isn't expecting it, etc., mundane things she'd feel dumb admitting to others that she gets startled by.
I'll leave it there. So again while you can still beat women, it's better to adopt a more modern, refined approach of exploiting the psychological weaknesses and insecurities of the female sex rather than the physical ones in the pursuit of fostering a healthy sense of humility in women, in the same way one must correct those dumb tiny dogs so they respect your orders and don't become loud and aggressive and make life hell for everyone around them. MGTOW brother.
Thank you for your invaluable advice. I noticed you excluded the classic fart hotboxing (holding the comforter over her head while lying in bed and then farting as obnoxiously as possible). What's your take on that one?
 
Back