Culture Mickey Mouse is Already Being Brutally Abused in the Public Domain - Free Mickey Mouse, Free It

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Article (Archive)

The first iterations of Mickey and Minnie Mouse have hit the public domain, with many wasting no time in appropriating the famous characters.

January 1 is Public Domain Day and the Disney character's Steamboat Willie from the short film of the same name is now in the public domain, meaning people can use it for free in almost any way they see fit.

Mickey Mouse has come to define the entire Disney brand and made his first appearance in the 1928 cartoon Steamboat Willie, which has now entered the public domain 95 years after its release.

Now that Steamboat Willie is entering the public domain, Disney will no longer be able to prevent other artists or companies from using the likeness of the character as he appeared in that short.

People got straight onto reworking the Steamboat Willie campaign, imagining him in everything from an anime version to many people creating horror stories for the character. Others reimagined Willie in a sexual nature or a violent criminal carrying weapons such as knives and guns.

Emmy winning director, Jason Gallagher, claimed to be one of the first people to create something with the public domain Willie.

He made a montage of clips from the film with colored panels over the top and the images in sync with Cardi B's hit rap song from 2020, "W.A.P."

"It's 2024 which means Mickey Mouse as the iconic Steamboat Willie is officially in the public domain. I believe this makes me the first person in the history of the world to legally reinterpret the character. Enjoy!" Gallagher wrote on X, formerly Twitter.

One person shared a short movie which was made just hours after Mickey's Steamboat Willie hit the public domain.

"The haunting of Steamboat Willie hours after hitting the public domain is fast work. #Infestation88 gives Mickey Mouse and his House of Mouse a whole new meaning," they wrote on X.

A trailer for another horror film using the public domain Mickey Mouse came out on Monday.The trailer and poster hinted the movie, called Mickey's Mouse Trap, will soon be released in theaters and included the hashtag, #TheMouseIsOut.

Steamboat Willie was the first-ever cartoon with synchronized sound and was a pioneering feat for modern animation when it was released. However, Mickey's appearance in that movie is different from today's version.

The more modern version of Mickey Mouse will not enter the public domain.

"Mickey Mouse as we know him, in color with gloves and shoes, will not enter the public domain," lawyer Marc Jonas Block told Newsweek in 2022. "Later, including current designs of Mickey Mouse, will still be copyrighted until their terms end. Also, Disney protects Mickey Mouse under both copyright and trademark laws."

Even though Mickey Mouse as Steamboat Willie is in the public, Daniel Mayeda from the UCLA School of Law warned people to be careful how they used his image.

"You can use the Mickey Mouse character as it was originally created to create your own Mickey Mouse stories or stories with this character," he told The Guardian in 2022.

"But if you do so in a way that people will think of Disney—which is kind of likely because they have been investing in this character for so long—then, in theory, Disney could say you violated my trademark."

Other titles to enter the public domain in the U.S. on January 1, 2024 included D.H Lawrence's Lady Chatterley's Lover, House at Pooh Corner by A.A. Milne which first introduced the Tigger character, J. M. Barrie's Peter Pan; or the Boy Who Wouldn't Grow Up, Virginia Woolf's Orlando and Agatha Christie's The Mystery of the Blue Train.
 
But, do they have the money and manpower to fight against an internet weaponized against them with a now half broken spear? (Copyright is a simple yes/no, you hold it or you don't. But trademark has to be proven case by case on a standard of "would this cause a reasonable person to think Disney endorses whatever this appears on?" )
Even if they don't have the means, they're probably going to try simply out of spite.
Disney would be a more tolerable company if it was ran by Scrooge.
Well, yeah. He loves money, and giving people the entertainment they want prints money.
 
Disney would be a more tolerable company if it was ran by Scrooge.
It would. Despite his greed, he wasn't so greedy he would put out shit products for a quick buck. He had a fucking work ethic. He wanted to do a job he'd be proud to stand behind.

He started as a fucking shoeshine boy shining shoes for 5 cents, and he did such a good job his first customer gave him a dime. And instead of spending that dime on candy like any other boy would have, he kept it to remind himself what hard work and a job well done will get you.

He would have looked at what people want, found out that Disney's original animated movies are the most beloved even if they do cost more to make, and he would have ordered the animation department restaffed and production on new animated features produced.

Because that's good business. Give the people what they want. And it's good for your company's reputation. There's a reason people loved Disney even despite it's flaws in the 90s and 00s, and why those same flaws stand out so much more these days. The flaws are no longer being outweighed by good qualities.
 
Last edited:
While I dont care much for what people make out of this, shitty movies for the most part, I will say I quite like seeing Disney's mascot getting used and abused just out of sheer spite against this very understandably hated company.
Mickey should have been in the public domain decades ago but congress "suddenly" decided to extend it. No ulterior motives at and fat checks at all.
 

He is finally free now.

1704211288006541.jpg
 
Back