Science Microsoft sinks data centre in the sea to study energy efficiency

Microsoft has sunk a data centre in the sea off Orkney to investigate whether it can boost energy efficiency.

The data centre, a white cylinder containing computers, could sit on the sea floor for up to five years.

An undersea cable brings the data centre power and takes its data to the shore and the wider internet - but if the computers onboard break, they cannot be repaired.

Orkney was chosen because it is a major centre for renewable energy research.

_101886535_rory5.jpg


The theory is that the cost of cooling the computers will be cut by placing them underwater.

"We think we actually get much better cooling underwater than on land," says Ben Cutler, who is in charge of what Microsoft has dubbed Project Natick.

"Additionally because there are no people, we can take all the oxygen and most of the water vapour out of the atmosphere which reduces corrosion, which is a significant problem in data centres."

_101886538_210e6efc-3086-4dd4-b138-ba56146960fb.jpg
Image copyrightAFP
Image captionThe computer racks going into the capsule

It will not be possible to repair the computers if they fail, but the hope is that there will be a lower failure rate than on land.

This is a tiny data centre compared with the giant sheds that now store so much of the world's information, just 12 racks of servers but with enough room to store five million movies.

Microsoft's first experimental underwater data centre, sunk for five months in 2015, was dubbed Leona Philpot after a character in an XBox game.

If Project Natick proves a success, Microsoft envisages sinking groups of five of these cylinders and being able to deploy a data centre offshore in 90 days, whereas it could take years on land.

The operation to sink the Orkney data centre has been an expensive multinational affair.

The cylinder was built in France by a shipbuilding company, Naval, loaded with its servers and then sailed from Brittany to Stromness in Orkney. There, another partner, the European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC), provided help including the undersea cable linking the centre to the shore.

The presence of EMEC, with its expertise in renewable energy and its knowledge of the seas around Orkney, was one factor behind Microsoft's decision to choose this location.

"We've got so much renewable energy here," says EMEC managing director Neil Kermode.

"We've produced more than we need since 2012."

_101883382_rory2.jpg

The Orkney Islands were early adopters of wind energy. And EMEC has been experimenting with tidal and wave energy for 14 years, with one of its test sites on the beach where the Project Natick cable comes ashore.

There has been growing concern that the rapid expansion of the data centre industry could mean an explosion in energy use.

But Emma Fryer, who represents the sector at Tech UK, says that fear has been exaggerated.

"What's happened is we've had the benefit of Moore's Law," she says.

The continued advances in processing power have made doom-laden predictions look foolish, Ms Fryer says.

"We've been able to deal with explosions of data with only a small increase in the energy used."

Nevertheless, she accepts there is a challenge as the industry continues to expand and she welcomes experiments such as Microsoft's.

"It's really exciting that they are thinking this radically," she says.

Ms Fryer also thinks situating data centres near to or under the sea is a good idea.

She says: "50% of the world's population live near the coast."

_101886426_rory3.jpg

Image captionThe data centre's new home
Another expert is not so sure.

Prof Ian Bitterlin, a data centre consultant for nearly 30 years, is sceptical about the environmental impact of going underwater.

"You just end up with a warmer sea and bigger fish," he says.

And 90% of Europe's data centres are in big cities such as London and Madrid because that is where they are needed.

Microsoft's Ben Cutler insists the warming effect will be minimal - "the water just metres downstream would get a few thousandths of a degree warmer at most" - and the overall environmental impact of the Orkney data centre will be positive.

As we bobbed about on a boat just above the site where the data centre was to be sunk the following day, I put it to him that many people might think the whole venture was a bit crazy.

"This is a crazy experiment that I hope will turn into reality" he said. "But this is a research project right now - and one reason we do different types of research into data centres is to learn what makes sense before we decide to take it to a larger scale."

Now, the Project Natick team will monitor the data centre for the next five years. It could turn out to be a signpost to the future - or maybe just a tourist attraction for passing fish.

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-44368813
 
They should use giant catapults to launch them to the Moon, and while they're doing it they can include giant catapults to shoot back Moon rocks.

Its actually quite an interesting concept beyond the energy savings (I'm replying to you because I know you're interested in legal autism). But if you sink a data centre in international waters it basically means no laws apply to you.

I think it was an idea The Pirate Bay was playing around with ages ago.
 
Its actually quite an interesting concept beyond the energy savings (I'm replying to you because I know you're interested in legal autism). But if you sink a data centre in international waters it basically means no laws apply to you.

I think it was an idea The Pirate Bay was playing around with ages ago.

It would seem that it would also be outside the protection of the law, too, and potentially vulnerable to attack. After all, cut that cable and you have a huge mess to deal with.
 
It would seem that it would also be outside the protection of the law, too, and potentially vulnerable to attack. After all, cut that cable and you have a huge mess to deal with.

Actually if you set it up right you'd possibly be able to have it very difficult to detect. You'd

Long range wi-fi can reach 25-50 miles which would still leave you open to having your position triangulated.

With the work going into "Global Internet" (weather balloon/drone/satellite internet) you could probably do it even easier.

Although "Global Internet" would take place over international waters too, but I'm not sure what the distinction is between international waters vs international airspace when it comes to laws.

Its not really as much of an interesting concept now because Bitcoin and any decentralized project that is actually decentralized doesn't really have any jurisdiction which can control it.
 
Actually if you set it up right you'd possibly be able to have it very difficult to detect. You'd

Long range wi-fi can reach 25-50 miles which would still leave you open to having your position triangulated.

With the work going into "Global Internet" (weather balloon/drone/satellite internet) you could probably do it even easier.

Although "Global Internet" would take place over international waters too, but I'm not sure what the distinction is between international waters vs international airspace when it comes to laws.

Its not really as much of an interesting concept now because Bitcoin and any decentralized project that is actually decentralized doesn't really have any jurisdiction which can control it.
Technically it's feasible the water around would act as a huge heat sink. The laws and environmental aspects idk.
 
I didn't knew about corrosion being a big problem for data centers, how does that work?


There's a bit of writing about it here:
https://journal.uptimeinstitute.com/solving-air-contaminant-problems-data-centers/
4.jpg


So I'm guessing that the cost of filters and "atmosphere control" is probably an overhead on the cost of the data centre.

If you can run the data centre underwater in a container that means you save money on cooling as well as hardware reliability/downtime for much longer.

If this ever entered mass use I guess they'd just give each underwater datacentre a life of 1-2 years, then pull it up, service it, and put it back down.

EDIT:
I forgot to add that you remove one of the more expensive issues with data centres: real estate. You don't have to pay to rent the ocean (although you'd have to factor in what it costs to submerge this shit and maintain them all)

So I think if you looked at all the benefits you'd possibly be able to operate the thing 10-20% cheaper than a convention data centre
 
Last edited:
You can't find a much better natural heat sink than water tbh. Heat robs power and causes tear and wear on silicon circuits. Of course they generate heat the better the heat sink the better the cooling hence longer life and better performance
 
Oooh this is pretty cool, I've always wanted a space heater!

But seriously, this is pretty neat. In my understanding of environmental issues, this actually wouldn't be a problem. While the immediate surroundings will get warmer, the worst thing that would be worrying is the encroaching of fish and the like due to the warmth that would emanate. Honestly, this is great.

This actually reminds me of a thing I saw once online, a guy had a really weird PC setup where the case was full of some kind of cooling gel and had no openings to leak. Kept everything cool but didn't fuck with the parts.

Seriously though, water's a great cooling measure when used the right way.

I've heard of people using it, I think it's called liquid cooling? It's considered the most optimal, but apparently kind of difficult to set up/maintain afaik since you have to make sure it doesn't mess up any of the other components.
 
This actually reminds me of a thing I saw once online, a guy had a really weird PC setup where the case was full of some kind of cooling gel and had no openings to leak. Kept everything cool but didn't fuck with the parts.

Seriously though, water's a great cooling measure when used the right way.

I know LinusTechTips did something like that. A special type of gel that provided pretty good heat dissipation and obviously zero noise.

Them tossing this underwater would save so much damn energy when it comes to data centers. Whenever I'd have to walk through one, the sound of the HVAC going is just nuts.

I've heard of people using it, I think it's called liquid cooling? It's considered the most optimal, but apparently kind of difficult to set up/maintain afaik since you have to make sure it doesn't mess up any of the other components.

Liquid cooling is typically just tubes full of water hooked up to the CPU and the video card. Can be very messy if a bad install takes place.
 
It would seem that it would also be outside the protection of the law, too, and potentially vulnerable to attack. After all, cut that cable and you have a huge mess to deal with.

Wouldn't the country which the data center connects to the internet have jurisdiction over the legality of the content sent and received? It would be easy to pressure that country to cut the internet access of an underwater data center.

New This actually reminds me of a thing I saw once online, a guy had a really weird PC setup where the case was full of some kind of cooling gel and had no openings to leak. Kept everything cool but didn't fuck with the parts.

I've seen some people use some kind of oil as a coolant, basically letting their PC sit in a fish tank. Then they have to have a radiator to cool the oil outside of the tank, so it's not a passive cooling system like they're suggesting here.
 
Last edited:
Why not have it chained to the ocean floor and float near the surface? That way it could be taken up for repairs easier.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Mr. 0
Why not have it chained to the ocean floor and float near the surface? That way it could be taken up for repairs easier.

It's cooler farther down and having the data-tank bouncing around like a buoy would probably be bad, anchoring it to the bottom makes sense. There's less cosmic radiation on the ocean floor as well.
 
Back