Science Microsoft sinks data centre in the sea to study energy efficiency

Microsoft has sunk a data centre in the sea off Orkney to investigate whether it can boost energy efficiency.

The data centre, a white cylinder containing computers, could sit on the sea floor for up to five years.

An undersea cable brings the data centre power and takes its data to the shore and the wider internet - but if the computers onboard break, they cannot be repaired.

Orkney was chosen because it is a major centre for renewable energy research.

_101886535_rory5.jpg


The theory is that the cost of cooling the computers will be cut by placing them underwater.

"We think we actually get much better cooling underwater than on land," says Ben Cutler, who is in charge of what Microsoft has dubbed Project Natick.

"Additionally because there are no people, we can take all the oxygen and most of the water vapour out of the atmosphere which reduces corrosion, which is a significant problem in data centres."

_101886538_210e6efc-3086-4dd4-b138-ba56146960fb.jpg
Image copyrightAFP
Image captionThe computer racks going into the capsule

It will not be possible to repair the computers if they fail, but the hope is that there will be a lower failure rate than on land.

This is a tiny data centre compared with the giant sheds that now store so much of the world's information, just 12 racks of servers but with enough room to store five million movies.

Microsoft's first experimental underwater data centre, sunk for five months in 2015, was dubbed Leona Philpot after a character in an XBox game.

If Project Natick proves a success, Microsoft envisages sinking groups of five of these cylinders and being able to deploy a data centre offshore in 90 days, whereas it could take years on land.

The operation to sink the Orkney data centre has been an expensive multinational affair.

The cylinder was built in France by a shipbuilding company, Naval, loaded with its servers and then sailed from Brittany to Stromness in Orkney. There, another partner, the European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC), provided help including the undersea cable linking the centre to the shore.

The presence of EMEC, with its expertise in renewable energy and its knowledge of the seas around Orkney, was one factor behind Microsoft's decision to choose this location.

"We've got so much renewable energy here," says EMEC managing director Neil Kermode.

"We've produced more than we need since 2012."

_101883382_rory2.jpg

The Orkney Islands were early adopters of wind energy. And EMEC has been experimenting with tidal and wave energy for 14 years, with one of its test sites on the beach where the Project Natick cable comes ashore.

There has been growing concern that the rapid expansion of the data centre industry could mean an explosion in energy use.

But Emma Fryer, who represents the sector at Tech UK, says that fear has been exaggerated.

"What's happened is we've had the benefit of Moore's Law," she says.

The continued advances in processing power have made doom-laden predictions look foolish, Ms Fryer says.

"We've been able to deal with explosions of data with only a small increase in the energy used."

Nevertheless, she accepts there is a challenge as the industry continues to expand and she welcomes experiments such as Microsoft's.

"It's really exciting that they are thinking this radically," she says.

Ms Fryer also thinks situating data centres near to or under the sea is a good idea.

She says: "50% of the world's population live near the coast."

_101886426_rory3.jpg

Image captionThe data centre's new home
Another expert is not so sure.

Prof Ian Bitterlin, a data centre consultant for nearly 30 years, is sceptical about the environmental impact of going underwater.

"You just end up with a warmer sea and bigger fish," he says.

And 90% of Europe's data centres are in big cities such as London and Madrid because that is where they are needed.

Microsoft's Ben Cutler insists the warming effect will be minimal - "the water just metres downstream would get a few thousandths of a degree warmer at most" - and the overall environmental impact of the Orkney data centre will be positive.

As we bobbed about on a boat just above the site where the data centre was to be sunk the following day, I put it to him that many people might think the whole venture was a bit crazy.

"This is a crazy experiment that I hope will turn into reality" he said. "But this is a research project right now - and one reason we do different types of research into data centres is to learn what makes sense before we decide to take it to a larger scale."

Now, the Project Natick team will monitor the data centre for the next five years. It could turn out to be a signpost to the future - or maybe just a tourist attraction for passing fish.

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-44368813
 
The no people=no air and water vapor aspect is cool. But the notion that free, unlimited cooling, no need for air filters, and increased longevity of the system and only 10% more efficient makes me think this will never catch on.

Especially after I make 2001 leagues: an ocean odyssey. A techno horror starring Nic Cage as a sexy scientist who has to find out why the off shore computer system went dark.
 
But seriously, this is pretty neat. In my understanding of environmental issues, this actually wouldn't be a problem. While the immediate surroundings will get warmer, the worst thing that would be worrying is the encroaching of fish and the like due to the warmth that would emanate. Honestly, this is great.
With the amount of energy we're talking about, it's literally a drop in the ocean. Shit would grow around it because of the additional heat, but I think that would be the extent of it.
Wouldn't the country which the data center connects to the internet have jurisdiction over the legality of the content sent and received? It would be easy to pressure that country to cut the internet access of an underwater data center.
I think the issue is that, being out in the middle of the ocean, anyone can just fucking steal it and there's no law about it.
 
This idea makes sense. Almost, too much sense. I like it though, not everything has to just "make sense"!
 
I think the issue is that, being out in the middle of the ocean, anyone can just fucking steal it and there's no law about it.

How do you steal basically a shipping container on the bottom of the ocean? You would need an exceedingly expensive submarine or something, and if you have that already, you're probably not so strapped for cash you have to steal a server farm.
 
How do you steal basically a shipping container on the bottom of the ocean? You would need an exceedingly expensive submarine or something, and if you have that already, you're probably not so strapped for cash you have to steal a server farm.
I'm sure some Africans will find a way.

Or wait, is this west coast or east coast?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. 0 and Shugo
Now make one with turbines on the outside to harvest ocean currents for power.
 
The no people=no air and water vapor aspect is cool. But the notion that free, unlimited cooling, no need for air filters, and increased longevity of the system and only 10% more efficient makes me think this will never catch on.

Especially after I make 2001 leagues: an ocean odyssey. A techno horror starring Nic Cage as a sexy scientist who has to find out why the off shore computer system went dark.

It wouldn't replace a full data center because its smaller.

But if you picture someone like Google or Microsoft implementing a thousand of these then 10% is a significant amount to save.

Plus once you actually start doing something like this no longer as a test you probably end up saving even more money once you've done it a while.

  • No rent/real estate
  • No HVAC
  • No degredation
  • Making it so your tech guys aren't even able to visit the datacentre while its submerged
You'd be saving far more than 10% tbh.
 
Back